Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:50, 1 June 2010

This talk page has been shortened. I have selected a few articles which I find worthy of keeping (especially my barnstar, and my first ever message), and deleted the rest. After I get your message and resolve whatever the issue is, I will usually delete it, unless I judge it worthy of keeping. Thank you.

Tel Aviv Image

I ask of you, please don't change the image I, myself, created and uploaded! the Collage one isn't as good looking as the Montage one... please, i've done everything right with the images and the sizes and it looks better than the shorter collage version!

Welcome!

Hello, Reenem! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

On Battle of lattakia

There is already an article for this battle at Battle of Latakia. In the future, please try to search for the existence of the article you want to create (and check for any misspellings on your part) before creating an article. Thanks, and happy editing! Arbiteroftruth (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Agent of Consent

Hi, I reverted your change to the age of consent article. Sorry to step on your toes. You added "It is illegal in the United States for someone over the age of 18 to have sexual relations with someone under the age of consent, which is refered to as statutory rape "

The problem is that the Age of Consent laws are much more complex than this. It varies widely by legal jurisdiction. In most states in the U.S. there are two primary criteria, first is usually the age difference between the two people. The second is the role of the person who the adolescent is involved with. Usually the age difference is something like 4 years, but can be staggered even in one state where the difference in age depends on the age of the adolescent. As I said, common is a four year difference. Secondarily, the role of the older person is important. If it is a school friend, that is one thing, it if is a relative, a priest, a teacher, a therapist, or some other person in a position of "authority" over the adolescent, the age difference often is not relevant.

Getting back to your statement -- in many states a 15 year old girl and a 19 yearl old boy would not be breaking the law if they were boyfriend and girlfriend (as long as he was not in a position of authority). Note that he is older than 18, having sexual relations with someone under the age of consent. A 13 year old and a 17 year old might be legal in some places. Of course, over the age of consent, (16 in many places) the girl could choose to have sexual relations with anyone (not in a position of authority over her) a long as they were older than the age difference (for a 16 year old, from age 12 through any age -- 25, 30, 50 for instance. as She had reached the age of consent, she could consent as she chose. Again, this does often not include withsomeone in a position of authority, or a family member. Atom (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Campaign boxes

Using this one as an example:

Click the little 'e' in the top left corner.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Battle_of_Maroun_al-Ras

A total of 8 IDF soldiers were killed there: July 19, 2006, Yonatan Hadasi and Yotam Gilboa. July 20, 2006, Benjamin Hillman, Refanael Muskal, Nadav Baeloha, Liran Saadia and Yonatan Vlasyuk. July 26, 2006, Yiftah Shreirer. I corrected the article. חובבשירה (talk) 07:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking of doing the same thing

I had seen your edits in 2008 Al-Qaeda offensive in Iraq and Operation Together Forward, I would like you to do the same thing in every article about the battles and operations of the Iraq War, thank. 69.234.186.84 (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

List of serial killers by country

Hello, I removed Manuel Martinez Coronado from the List of serial killers by country because he murdered his seven victims at the same time, which makes him a mass murderer not a serial killer. momoricks (make my day) 04:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Result of Sino-French War

Do you have any particular reason for disputing that the Sino-French War ended in a French victory, or do you just not like the thought of the French having won? I have summed up the opposing views as fairly as I could in the opening paragraph, and I believe that I have been, if anything, too generous in referring to Chinese claims that they won the war. I suppose a possible compromise would be to split the difference between 'French victory' and 'ceasefire' with a formulation like 'result and significance disputed', and this formula could then be extended to hundreds of other Misplaced Pages articles on battles where one user objects to the majority consensus. I'm sure there's a French user out there who would like to see this formula applied to the Battle of Waterloo, for example. But I think some respect must be paid to the conventional verdict on the war. The result of the Sino-French War was thrashed out on the discussion page for this article long before I started rewriting it last summer, and I thought that for once consensus had been reached. Obviously I was wrong.

For the time being I've reverted your edit, and I look forward to an animated discussion on the result of the Sino-French War in the next few weeks. I would love to succeed in stirring up controversy over this 120-year-old war, as it might push the sales of my forthcoming book on the subject into respectable figures ...

Djwilms (talk) 04:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Please read the "aftermath" section of the Sino-French war article. It states that France got "most of what it wanted". If you read the section, it should answer a few questions. Also, look at most of the battles and you will see China lost most of them and suffered heavier causalties. User:Reenem (talk)

I know, I wrote all the articles.

Sorry, have I got you wrong? I thought it was you who changed the verdict from 'French victory' to 'ceasefire'. If I've been too hasty, I apologize.

You're certainly right that the French won the war. That's the main thing.

Djwilms (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Chawinda

hi a pro indian admin nishkid has altered the article please reinsert the neutral unbiased info 86.158.178.202 (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Longewala

Hi reneem you seem to have knowledge about battles i wanted you to reinsert the controversy section in the longewala article which stated the battle was faked the words a indian general sadly it was removed by pov pushing nationalists please reinsert it was valid information 12jh900 (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Well the controversy section was removed and it was clearly sited by two sources the reason being "fictional article" which is pathetic im new so i cant revert vandalism on semi protected pages but your a established editor and know about war :) i would be greatfull if you could reinsert the controversy section 12jh900 (talk) 07:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

New! Pakistani military history task force

  

I am contacting you because I see you have contributed to articles about the military history of Pakistan or its armed forces. To help improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of this important topic, and to provide support and coordination of individual editors, the Military history WikiProject has now set up a newPakistani military history task force.

If you would like to join up, as a founder member of this important new initiative, please add your name to the Participants' List. Thank you for your time. I hope you can help.  Roger Davies 06:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Editing survey

Hi Reenem. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic current events articles on Misplaced Pages. I have noticed in the talk page archives at 2008 South Ossetia war that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. An explanation of my project is included with the survey.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kLMxj8dkk_2bls7yCBmNV7bg_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 17:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your many contributions to military history articles over a long period of time, and for creating new articles such as 2009 Khyber Pass offensive, Perejil Island crisis and 2004 South Ossetia clashes. Offliner (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Westerplatte

Hi. I was curious to understand your rationale for reinserting "pyrrhic" in the information box concerning the result of the battle without an explanation or edit summary. Thanks. Dr. Dan (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining your interpretation. Would you be in favor of inserting "pyrrhic victory" in to the information box concerning the Battle of the Alamo? Dr. Dan (talk) 02:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Please continue to visit Wikinews...

Your first article there is being at your talk page and at the article's talk page, but nobody else has changed it. Wikinews does not publish reports on events that have happened three or more days ago. I do not know exactly, but I suppose your article at Wikinews might get deleted if you do not visit and modify it. Q0k (~~ ?) 05:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

This article should be published before November 29th - it's time sensitive - so, please visit it often to see whether it is published, and what reviewers asked you to do. Q0k (~~ ?) 05:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Your RFA

Hi Reeneem. Please don't take this the wrong way, but I would strongly recommend you withdraw your RFA, you have very little chance of passing, as you have very little edits outside articlespace - this isn't a bad thing, it just doesn't show any knowledge of how to use them, an admin needs to have experience of fighting vandalism, the deletion policies and helping resolve disputes, to name a few. Don't take this personally, just keep going as you are--Jac16888 06:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

I, too, would recommend you withdraw from this RfA, it will not pass as people have too many concerns with your temperment per your user page. Displaying such an offensive view of the world doesn't exactly inspire confidence that you're going to handle disputes with a calm manner. I'm impressed with your work in articlespace however, so keep up the good work there. In future, before an RfA, you may wish to participate in some administrative areas such as WP:AfD and WP:CSD, or whatever suits your interests the most. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  14:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

I enjoyed your user page, and you are much smarter than an old guy like me ... but not wiser! Before you run for Admin again, it would be wise (maybe even smart) to tone down the rhetoric! A fan. Ret.Prof (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA

Sorry, I have closed your RfA as an early close, as it appeared quite obvious that at this moment you had no chance of passing. Perhaps it would have been better if you had asked some experienced users for advice before running, then this frustration might have been avoided. I'd recommend waiting at least several months before you think of trying again (some people on the RfA said at least a year). Regards, --Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Hints on Improvement

Hey Reenem, this is just free advice, you can take it, leave it, delete it, I don't care. When reevalutating a vote, first take a look at the neutral advice offered to you, as that is priceless:

To Reenem, your user page as the thing points out is alarming and would be a good first step for improvement.

I cannot support you this time round Reenem but I'll have no problem supporting a future RfA once the above issues have been addressed, with that said, I would strongly encourage you to reevaluate what you'd like to do with the tools, both things you listed under Q1 can be done without the aid of extra tools.

When you improve your attitude, and remove some of the more worse stuff on your page, and wait a year or so for all those blocks to fade away (on the way maybe aquiring even more edits), Your'e going to get a support from me.

You have passion that drives you, and that is a good thing. However, some of your statements can be offensive to others.

Here is a list of some of the things that you can improve: Hi, Im here to show of my smartness. - Than show it, don't tell us about it. Remember English class? Show, don't tell. Saying "I'm smart" makes you look stupid, even though you have the well deserved barnstar from Offliner, which clearly shows that you are smart. But instead of saying "I'm Smart" - just display the barnstar.

Any questions? Didn't think so. - believe it or not, that may come off as rude to some people, so just don't do it.

In the "Articles I Created" section, don't list an article twice.

I like your sense of humor, but some people might not. Clarifying that you are being humorous in the last two sections can go a long way towards improvement.

Another thing that you may consider doing, is participating in the RfC discussions, in your area of expertise.

I hope these few hints help,

HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 08:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Polite request

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Misplaced Pages. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. RM

Ariel

is in the West Bank, not in Israel. Please do not continue moving that page. nableezy - 04:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

You are mistaken. The West Bank is Palestinian territory held under military occupation by Israel. It is not "in Israel". "Judea and Samaria", more properly the "Judea and Samaria Area" is the Israeli administrative name for the territory goverened by the military, it does not include East Jerusalem which likewise is part of the occupied Palestinian territories. I do not plan on arguing the point, there is not an actual dispute about these facts in the sources, but please do not continue making that move. nableezy - 04:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Israel-Argentina relations

A tag has been placed on Israel-Argentina relations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Misplaced Pages page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Atlan (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. It just needed a target fix. I searched for Argentina Israel relations, but nothing came up. So much for Misplaced Pages's search engine... --Atlan (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Wow, i can't believe this page is so empty, its quite easy to fit in. You have whathisname (the Nazi officer) taken from Argentina by Mossad and tried for war crimes. There are various other Nazi's whove settled in Argentina (and Chile); though oddly, I've noticed Argentina seems to have a large Jewish and Nazi presence. You might add something in that regard. Of course the 2 bombings in the 1980's are there too.Lihaas (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Racist editor

You can find all the info on AN/I...--Crossmr (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

veracruz pic

I had been meaning to change the infoxbox pic on Veracruz, Veracruz. Much better.Thelmadatter (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Images

-FASTILY 06:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Friends?

I need a bud too. Yes. Could you be my friend. yes I see you behind me. By the way...I like the thingy that says "This user is right behind you" but I can see you in my heart. We're NOT girlfriend boyfriend we're just...buds...

Thanks! Chow! --RNelson5577 (talk) 03:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

HIP HOP HOORAY!

I put my 1st EVER photo on my page. It's just a blue thingy...yes. You should see it now! Thanks! --RNelson5577 (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCookies For U

I want to give you wikicookies. No LOVE but Wikilove.Chocolate Chip.

These promote WikiLove From RNelson5577 --RNelson5577 (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

cookies

Thank you and you're welcome!. Dlohcierekim 23:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Reply

Hi. I agree a montage would be the best. However, just an image of the city's central business district is not representative enough to be an infobox image, unless the skyline (New York, etc.) is the best-known icon of the city. In Beijing's case, that's clearly not the case.--TheLeopard (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Undo

You can easily revert disruptive edits yourself. Click the history button to visit the article's history page and use the "undo" link next to the edit in question. See WP:UNDO for more information about this. — Rankiri (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, never mind that. I saw the cookies and automatically mistook you for a new editor. Sorry :) — Rankiri (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Collage

Please, join the discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Podgorica#Collage.3F Rave92 16:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DAI (Δ) 17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

why, I will wait for the closure..--DAI (Δ) 09:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

One of a kind

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		You have given me so much advice without me asking. Ok sometimes but you are a one of a kind. You are the BEST EVER Reenem. RNelson5577 (talk) 05:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism link

Hi, while the wikipedia namespace and articles should ideally be separate, the link in the vandalism page is useful to users not used to navigating WP:space. Many other commonly used WP: pages can be got to through a standard search (search for warnings or tags for example), and although these other pages a linked in a disambigation page, as vandalism has no disambig page, I think it makes sense to have it linking through from the default page. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 01:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

ITN for 2010 Moscow Metro terrorist bombings

On 29 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Moscow Metro terrorist bombings, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

ENGVAR

Hi. Your move of the Defence Forces (Ireland) article to Defense Forces (Ireland) is not appropriate. Unless there is a specific reason for this move (that I'm not seeing), then the move appears to breach WP:ENGVAR and WP:COMMONNAME. Put simply, we (in Ireland) do not use the "Defense" spelling. To the extent that the official title of the forces is "The Defence Forces". See the official site for verification. Any comments/inputs before I move it back again? Guliolopez (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Holywood car bombing

A tag has been placed on 2010 Holywood car bombing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lihaas (talk) 03:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

2010 Holywood car bombing

RE: The message you sent me

"Please do not vandalize and make personal attacks as you just did to Portal:Current events, or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--RM (Be my friend) 19:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)"

I just thought I'd let you know I was actually the one who removed the defamation regarding Barack Obama, which I believe was posted by 198.108.164.5. I'm sure it was just a mix up :)

AfD nomination of List of casualties of the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of casualties of the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of casualties of the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikilove

I am sorry i've never contacted you in a long time. I'm just sad that i've never gotten wikilove before. Well to promote wikilove, I want to give you a peace dove. I miss you!

RNelson5577 (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Dropping by,

Hello! I'm just dropping by for a quick visit. Happy (later) Earth Day! I am very cold and you know, I don't know why I keep having this, Stomach Ache...Every day...no reason. Thank you very much for these furry cute kittens. They have healed my soul from the devil's angry greed in my heart. I need to get to bed. Thanks!

Good Morning!

Good morning Reenem! What are you doing? All I do around here is usualy "use" wikipedia and log in so I can hang out with my friends. Do you know anything about medical you can teach me? I am really interested in medical. Well, I'll say more in like 2 or 3 minutes. I have to pee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RNelson5577 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Surprise!

Hey, are you tired? I'm just a bit yawny that's all. Would you like a cup of cofee? I bet you'd appriciate it. Just blow on it! It's a bit hot...--RNelson5577 (talk) 16:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

RNelson5577 (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Night Night!

Are you still tired? I want to give you a teddy bear. Teddy bears promote wikilove.

{{subst:currentuser}} has given you a teddy bear!Teddy Bears promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Teddy bear, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

That's nice...

Hello! I could also be your friend. You know about RNelson5577? I'm her 16 year old daugher. I am just like my mom! My mother got blocked because of my sister. My sister is actully the troll after my mother and she's planned to live with her father because my parents are seperating. Anyway... I want to have a friend in mind. Ok? I'll give you wikilove later on. Don't ask me what you want. It's a surprise... --Nelson5577 (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Harper's Weekly

I have a few reservations about the H. Strickland Constable illustration, which together with the Nast anti-Irish cartoon you also added may create an emphasis problem. Harper's was a fairly typical publication of its day in its racial attitudes; it wasn't Der Stürmer, although a reader unfamiliar with HW may get that impression from the evidence in our article. At minimum, I think the Strickland Constable drawing should be pushed further down on the page; this would also put it in chronological order vis-à-vis the other illustrations.

But there's a more fundamental question: Do you know which issue of Harper's Weekly the illustration appeared in? As far as I can tell the original source for this file is a course outline connected with the Nebraska Dept. of Education, where the illustration is alleged to be from Harper's Weekly, no year specified. The author of the course outline is unidentified, which makes for a less-than-ideal source, and I strongly suspect that the attribution is mistaken. It's difficult to tell from the blurry jpeg in Commons, but the font in the text looks wrong for Harper's. What is clear is that the lines are about 125 characters long, which is a problem; in the late 1890s Harper's articles were always laid out in double columns of about 40 characters per line. I've gone through the Harper's online archive for 1899, and didn't find this piece, or anything resembling it. Disregard this--the archive I saw was for Harper's Monthly, not the weekly magazine. Ewulp (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

My guess is that the source of this is H. Strickland Constable's Ireland from One or Two Neglected Points of View, which was apparently published in 1888 and again in 1899. What looks like a "Harper's Weekly" watermark at the upper right of the drawing at the NDE website may be Strickland Constable crediting Harper's with the engraving that illustrates his own text seen below it, but this is speculation on my part. I think the jpeg should be removed from the article unless there is a better source that establishes the origin of both text and image as Harper's. Ewulp (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! Yes, I saw both of those. The illustration on page 146 of Material modernism: the politics of the page has a caption that says that it comes from Strickland Constable's book; it doesn't mention Harper's. Elsewhere on page 146, Harper's Weekly is mentioned, but only as the source of the Thomas Nast illustration (figure 31) printed on page 147. Nothing here indicates that the Constable image came from Harper's. The Scientific Racism article seems to be repeating the same mistake, and Misplaced Pages can't be cited as a source for Misplaced Pages. Ewulp (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Jerusalem

How familiar are you with it? Chesdovi (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

No! What I mean is: Are you familiar with the city itself. Have you been there? Where do you live? Chesdovi (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Well that explains it then! First you thought the Tower of David was the Western Wall, then that Our Lady of the Spasm is in the Armeanean Quarter! I cannot fix your amendments at present, but will try to at work tomorrow. Chesdovi (talk) 21:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, I fixed them already (I hope).--RM (Be my friend) 22:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Reenem. You have new messages at ElationAviation's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Reenem. You have new messages at Talk:2010_Thai_political_protests#Name.
Message added 19:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.