Misplaced Pages

:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 9: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:49, 9 June 2010 editWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits →June 9← Previous edit Revision as of 03:56, 9 June 2010 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →Template:Dancing with the Stars (United States) Season 2: <del>Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
* ] * ]


This template offers nothing that is not present at the article for this television program. It's essentially redundant to the article page, which has far greater and informative detail. The category wascreated along with this list and is only a listing of celebrity dance participants. Cast listing templates are not useful. ] (]) 02:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC) This template offers nothing that is not present at the article for this television program. It's essentially redundant to the article page, which has far greater and informative detail. The category was created along with this list and is only a listing of celebrity dance participants. Cast listing templates are not useful. ] (]) 02:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' all. It is inappropriate to tag people, typically actors, with navigation boxes specific to an individual role. Such people typically will have many roles over their careers and such an approach would have about a hundred navboxes at the foot of someone such as ]. Sincerely, ] 03:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:56, 9 June 2010

< June 8 June 10 >

June 9

Template:Dancing with the Stars (United States) Season 2

Template:Dancing with the Stars (United States) Season 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This nomination is joined by the others:

and also by the main template because it is deficient in coverage and is again a listing of cast:

This template offers nothing that is not present at the article for this television program. It's essentially redundant to the article page, which has far greater and informative detail. The category was created along with this list and is only a listing of celebrity dance participants. Cast listing templates are not useful. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete all. It is inappropriate to tag people, typically actors, with navigation boxes specific to an individual role. Such people typically will have many roles over their careers and such an approach would have about a hundred navboxes at the foot of someone such as Laurence Olivier. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 03:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)