Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Hello Tonalone: Regarding ]. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. ] (]) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Tonalone: Regarding ]. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. ] (]) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
== Banned users ==
I've noticed that you've been removing chunks of material from articles for several months, claiming it was added by some unnamed banned user. Please explain who this "banned user" is and how you know who they are. I find your edits really dubious. We are ''not'' obliged to remove edits by banned users but usually decide on a case-by-case basis - we certainly don't do it if it doesn't damage the articles because the articles are what we're all here for. If you continue edit warring and deleting material from articles without giving a damn good reason (and some vague "banned user" claim is not a good reason) you're the one who is going to be blocked for damaging articles. I've looked at the history of this page and I see this has been an issue since at least back in February when someone contacted you about the Szymanowski article. FYI, per the ] policy, which allows editors in good standing to take responsibility for a banned user's reverted edits, I've restored that material to the page. ] 13:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Hello Tonalone: Regarding Malik Ayaz. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. 69.226.218.19 (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Banned users
I've noticed that you've been removing chunks of material from articles for several months, claiming it was added by some unnamed banned user. Please explain who this "banned user" is and how you know who they are. I find your edits really dubious. We are not obliged to remove edits by banned users but usually decide on a case-by-case basis - we certainly don't do it if it doesn't damage the articles because the articles are what we're all here for. If you continue edit warring and deleting material from articles without giving a damn good reason (and some vague "banned user" claim is not a good reason) you're the one who is going to be blocked for damaging articles. I've looked at the history of this page and I see this has been an issue since at least back in February when someone contacted you about the Szymanowski article. FYI, per the BAN policy, which allows editors in good standing to take responsibility for a banned user's reverted edits, I've restored that material to the page. Sarah13:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
