| Revision as of 03:33, 16 June 2010 editKintetsubuffalo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers203,496 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:55, 16 June 2010 edit undoNovaseminary (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,467 edits →Douglas tait: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Move''' to the correct capitalization. ] (]) 01:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Move''' to the correct capitalization. ] (]) 01:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' to keep it from being linkspammed over every damn article as it is being now. --] (]) 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' to keep it from being linkspammed over every damn article as it is being now. --] (]) 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Without articles with significant coverage about him, fails ]/] generally. Lack of major roles means he fails ]. And he was only nominated for a SAG award; it appears he did not win. ] (]) 14:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 16 June 2010
Douglas tait
- Douglas tait (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Minor actor. No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Well, as part of a stunt ensemble, the fellow was nominated for a Screen Actors Guild Award, so as to meet WP:ANYBIO. I'll see what I can do to improve it and report back. Schmidt, 01:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep While failing WP:GNG, and while he has had small roles in his early career as has any actor, it is my determination that in his total career he meets WP:ENT. His SAG Awards nomination is a nice extra. Schmidt, 04:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Many roles in notable shows, and won a notable award. Dream Focus 05:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep — clearly notable from the links provided, although the references need to be sorted out and converted from bare links. This is not a reason for deletion however. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. There are no sources about him. And if it is thought that being nominated for an award to a collective of people this large is notable then that is laughable. And please note that this is a nomination, not even a win, so does not meet WP:ANYBIO, not matter how liberally interpreted. WP:ENT calls for significant roles, which he does not appear to have had. Find some sources actually about the person, and I will reconsider. Quantpole (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, per Quantpole. All the references I've seen so far are passing mention or press releases. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Move to the correct capitalization. RussianReversal (talk) 01:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete to keep it from being linkspammed over every damn article as it is being now. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Without articles with significant coverage about him, fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG generally. Lack of major roles means he fails WP:ENT. And he was only nominated for a SAG award; it appears he did not win. Novaseminary (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)