| Revision as of 18:13, 17 June 2010 editVanished user oerjio4kdm3 (talk | contribs)2,640 editsm →My apologies← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:14, 17 June 2010 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →My apologies: hathabNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| == My apologies == | == My apologies == | ||
| {{hat}} | |||
| Is it that you do not engage in sockpuppetry? That you have never sockpuppeted? That a checkuser of yourself would not reveal suspicious activity (e.g. editing from open proxies)? ] (]) 18:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | Is it that you do not engage in sockpuppetry? That you have never sockpuppeted? That a checkuser of yourself would not reveal suspicious activity (e.g. editing from open proxies)? ] (]) 18:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Yes, no, yes. ] (]) 18:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{hab}} | |||
Revision as of 18:14, 17 June 2010
Facepalm You will remove talkback notices every time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. They will never stop.
| |
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
f**********
I took a few days out and find you accusing me of ignoring a sock !!!! You do know I have edited CC articles and am effecitively not an admin. :). Polargeo (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Where is the socky evidence? You must realise you have been a little over the top lately. Polargeo (talk)
- Like I said - I'm done putting in the time, so you're responsible for every obvious sockpuppet I decline to spend hours researchung. If anyone is "over the top," it's you. Hipocrite (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Fucking hell. I must be insane if you are calling me over the top. I promise to be a little more sensible. But seriously I would be interested in your summary of said sock man. Polargeo (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said - I'm done putting in the time, so you're responsible for every obvious sockpuppet I decline to spend hours researchung. If anyone is "over the top," it's you. Hipocrite (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
National-Anarchism
Hello Hipocrite. Since I will try my best to collaborate with Ottre to avoid an edit war, can you please unblock the National-Anarchism article right away so I can continue improving the article on related to the dispute between him and me? --Loremaster (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Contrary to all that is good an pure, I'm not, nor am I likley to be, an adminstrator, so I can't, sorry. If you can mutually promise not to edit war (or perhaps if you pledge not to revert his changes, regardless of how terrible you think they are) make a request at WP:RFPP. Or just propose changes on talk, get consensus, and use {{editprotected}} to have them made on the article. Hipocrite (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh I see... --Loremaster (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
My apologies
| This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Is it your position that you do not engage in sockpuppetry? That you have never sockpuppeted? That a checkuser of yourself would not reveal suspicious activity (e.g. editing from open proxies)? TheGoodLocust (talk) 18:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
|