| Revision as of 19:06, 24 June 2010 editSpigotMap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,905 editsm →Cyberattacs← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:38, 25 June 2010 edit undoRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →Disruption of political blogs: this section belongs at web brigades where it was deemed to be outside of the scope of an encyclopaedia articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| *One of structures having related business with the Internet is ], which is currently a part of the ] and has been formerly a part of 16th ] department; | *One of structures having related business with the Internet is ], which is currently a part of the ] and has been formerly a part of 16th ] department; | ||
| *There is a related agency in ] with competent people who can do such things.<ref name=Albats_talk/> | *There is a related agency in ] with competent people who can do such things.<ref name=Albats_talk/> | ||
| ==Disruption of political blogs== | |||
| {{Main|web brigades}} | |||
| The appearance of Russian state security teams in ] was alleged in 2003 by ] Anna Polyanskaya <ref name=Pol1>, MAOF publishing group</ref> (a former assistant to assassinated ] politician ]<ref>{{Ru icon}} , by Anna Polyanskaya</ref>), ] Andrey Krivov and political activist Ivan Lomako. They claimed the appearance of organized and fairly professional "brigades", composed of ideologically and methodologically identical personalities, who were working in practically every popular ] and pro-] Internet forums and Internet newspapers of RuNet.<ref name="Polyanskaya"> by Anna Polyanskaya, Andrei Krivov, and Ivan Lomko, Vestnik online, April 30, 2003 ()</ref>. | |||
| ===Behavior=== | |||
| According to Polyanskaya and her colleagues, the behavior of people from the Internet brigades has distinct features, some of which are the following:<ref name="Polyanskaya"/><ref>, Anna Polyanskaya Andrei Krivov, Ivan Lomko, 19 - 03 - 2009, ]</ref> | |||
| *Propaganda of the ], and constant attempts to present in a positive light the entire history of Russia and the ], minimizing the number of people who died in repressions. | |||
| *Boundless loyalty to ] and his circle. | |||
| *Respect and admiration for the ] and ]. The key word which "will force them to reveal their true colors is ]"; the brigade will cry out in a choir about "bloody repressions by democratic murderers" and "witch hunts" after mentioning this word. | |||
| *Hatred of ] and ] organizations and activists, ]s and ]s, especially ], ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
| *] and anti-Westernism. | |||
| *Accusation of ] against everyone who disagrees with them. | |||
| *Tendency to accuse their opponents of being ] during arguments. | |||
| *Round-the-clock presence on forums. At least one of the uniform members of the team can be found online at all times, always ready to repulse any “attack” by a ]. | |||
| ===Tactics=== | |||
| *'''Individual work on opponents.''' "As soon as an opposition-minded liberal arrives on a forum, expressing a position that makes them a clear "ideological enemy”, he is immediately cornered and subjected to “]” by the unified web-brigade. Without provocation, the opponent is piled on with abuse or vicious “arguments” of the sort that the average person cannot adequately react to. As a result, the liberal either answers sharply, causing a scandal and getting himself labeled a “boor” by the rest of the brigade, or else he starts to make arguments against the obvious absurdities, to which his opponents pay no attention, but simply ridicule him and put forth other similar arguments."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/> | |||
| *'''Accusations that opponents are working for “enemies”'''. The opponents are accused of taking money from ], the ], the ], ], the ], or the ] rebels. | |||
| *'''Making personally offensive comments''', especially of sexual nature. | |||
| *'''Remarkable ability to reveal personal information''' about their opponents and their quotes from old postings, sometimes more than a year old. | |||
| *'''Teamwork'''. "They unwaveringly support each other in discussions, ask each other leading questions, put fine points on each other’s answers, and even pretend not to know each other. If an opponent starts to be hounded, this hounding invariably becomes a team effort, involving all of the three to twenty nicknames that invariably are present on any political forum 24 hours a day."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/> | |||
| *'''Appealing to the Administration'''. The members of teams often "write mass collective complaints about their opponents to the editors, site administrators, or the electronic “complaints book”, demanding that one or another posting or whole discussion thread they don’t like be removed, or calling for the banning of individuals they find problematic."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/> | |||
| *'''Destruction of inconvenient forums'''. For example, on the site of the ], all critics of ] and the FSB "were suddenly and without any explanation banned from all discussions, despite their having broken none of the site’s rules of conduct. All the postings of this group of readers, going back a year and a half, were erased by the site administrator."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/> | |||
| =="LiveJournal fighters"== | =="LiveJournal fighters"== | ||
Revision as of 18:38, 25 June 2010
Cyberwarfare by Russian state includes allegations of denial of service attacks, hacker attacks, dissemination of disinformation over the internet, participation of state-sponsored teams in political blogs, internet surveillance using SORM technology, and persecution of cyber-dissidents. According to investigative journalist Andrei Soldatov , some of these activities are coordinated by the Russian signals intelligence, which is currently a part of the FSB but has been formerly a part of 16th KGB department, but others are directed by the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Other than the allegations, there is no evidence that the Russian state is involved in cyberwarfare.
See also Web brigades.
Disinformation
US journalist Pete Earley described his interviews with former senior Russian intelligence officer Sergei Tretyakov who defected in the United States in 2000. According to him,
Sergei would send an officer to a branch of New York Public Library where he could get access to the Internet without anyone knowing his identity. The officer would post the propaganda on various websites and send it in emails to US publications and broadcasters. Some propaganda would be disguised as educational or scientific reports. ... The studies had been generated at the Center by Russian experts. The reports would be 99% accurate but would always contain a kernel of disinformation that favored Russian foreign policy. ... "Our goal was to cause dissension and unrest inside the US and anti-American feelings abroad"
.
Tretyakov did not specify the targeted web sites, but made clear they selected the sites which are most convenient for distributing the specific disinformation. During his work in New York in the end of 1990s, one of the most frequent disinformation subjects was War in Chechnya.
According to a publication in Russian computer weekly Computerra, "just because it became known that anonymous editors are editing articles in English Misplaced Pages in the interests of UK and US intelligence and security services, it is also likely that Russian security services are involved in editing Russian Misplaced Pages, but this is not even interesting to prove it — because everyone knows that security bodies have a special place in structure of our state"
Cyberattacks
Main article: 2007 cyberattacks on Estonia Main article: Cyberattacks during the 2008 South Ossetia warIt has been claimed that Russian security services organized a number of denial of service attacks as a part of their Cyber-warfare against other countries, most notably 2007 cyberattacks on Estonia and 2008 cyberattacks on Russia, South Ossetia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan . One of young Russian hackers said that he was paid by the Russian state security services to lead the hacker attacks on NATO computers. He was majoring computer sciences at the Department of the Defense of Information. His tuition was paid by the FSB
At the same time, speaking of 2007 cyberattacks, Estonia's defence minister Jaak Aaviksoo admitted he does not possess evidence of Russian involvement in cyberattacks.
As to the 2008 cyberattacks on Georgia, an independent US-based research institute US Cyber Consequences Unit report stated the attacks had "little or no direct involvement from the Russian government or military". According to the institute's conclusions, some severalattacks were carried from PCs of multiple users, located in Russia, Ukraine and Latvia. These people were willingly participating in cyberwarfare, being Russia supporters during 2008 South Ossetia war. Some attacks also used botnets.
According to Soldatov, a hacker attack on his web site Agentura was apparently directed by the secret services in the middle of Moscow theater hostage crisis.
Discussion on control over the Internet
In 2006 radio talk show hosted by Yevgenia Albats with a topic "Control over the Internet: How does that happen?", Russian journalist Andrei Soldatov made the following points:
- There are countries with greater or less control over the Internet; but there is control over the Internet in Russia;
- During the US invasion of Iraq, a group of people calling themselves GRU officers published allegedly internal GRU information on American losses in Iraq — this information was shown on the background of Anti-American hysteria and was well consumed. Later it turned out this information was not credible, but this effectively didn't change the result;
- After 2005 Nalchik raid Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement that Kavkaz Center "is a very bad resource", and after two days two teams calling themselves hackers appeared, to arrange hacker attacks against Kavkaz Center;
- Soldatov doesn't think web brigades are fiction. He had related issues with his own site, especially during such events like Moscow theater hostage crisis;
- One of structures having related business with the Internet is signals intelligence, which is currently a part of the FSB and has been formerly a part of 16th KGB department;
- There is a related agency in Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs with competent people who can do such things.
"LiveJournal fighters"
A member of National Bolshevik Party Roman Sadykhov reported about "LiveJournal fighters", directed and paid from the Kremlin and instructions given to them by Vladislav Surkov, a close aide of Vladimir Putin Surkov allegedly called Livejournal "a very important sector of work" and said that people's brains must be "nationalized" . He instructed "LiveJournal fighters" that
- "We are losing in the Internet in that respect. It is always easier to break down things than to do something positive. What you are doing are jokes and minor infractions. Not only methods, but also goals must be radical. We must blow this romantics out of them . It is important not only to protect the authorities - this is understood, but we need to attract young people who can work creatively in the Internet. This is an important communication place of young people. Make them interested in conversations with you."
Comments by Russian government official
Alexander Yusupovskiy, head of the analytical department of the Federation Council of Russia (Russian Parliament) published in 2003 an article "Conspiracy theory" in Russian Journal with criticism of theory of web brigades.
Russian agents in Polish web sites
According to claims of unnamed "Polish experts on Russian affairs", reported by the Polish newspaper Tygodnik Powszechny in 2005, at least a dozen active Russian agents work in Poland, also investigating the Polish Internet. The source also claims that the agents scrutinize Polish websites (like those supporting Belarusian opposition), and also perform such actions, as—for instance—contributing to Internet forums on large portals (like Gazeta.pl, Onet.pl, WP.pl). Labeled as Polish Internet users, they incite anti-Semitic or anti-Ukrainian discussions or disavow articles published on the web, according to the source.
In popular culture
The alleged FSB activities on the Internet have been described in the short story "Anastasya" by Russian writer Grigory Svirsky, who was interested in the moral aspects of their work. He wrote: "It seems that offending, betraying, or even "murdering" people in the virtual space is easy. This is like killing an enemy in a video game: one does not see a disfigured body or the eyes of the person who is dying right in front of you. However, the human soul lives by its own basic laws that force it to pay the price for the virtual crime in his real life".
See also
- Information warfare
- Harassment by computer
- Jingjing and Chacha
- Computer crime
- Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China
- Astroturfing
- Web brigades
- 50 Cent Party
References
- ^ State control over the internet, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, January 22, 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
- Pete Earley, "Comrade J: The Untold Secrets of Russia's Master Spy in America After the End of the Cold War", Penguin Books, 2007, ISBN 978-0-399-15439-3, pages 194-195
- Is there only one truth? by Kivy Bird, Computerra, 26 November 2008
- Cyberspace and the changing nature of warfare. Strategists must be aware that part of every political and military conflict will take place on the internet, says Kenneth Geers.
- Andrew Meier, Black Earth. W.W. Norton & Company, 2003, ISBN 0-393-05178-1, pages 15-16.
- ^ Control over the Internet: how does that happen?, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, January 22, 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
- Template:Ru icon Interview with Roman Sadykhov, grani.ru, 3 April 2007
- ^ Military wing of Kremlin (Russian), The New Times, 19 March 2007
- Conspiracy theory, by Alexander Yusupovskiy, Russian Journal, 25 April 2003
- Operation "Disinformation" - The Russian Foreign Office vs "Tygodnik Powszechny", Tygodnik Powszechny, 13/2005
- " Grigory Svirsky Anastasya. A story on-line (Full text in Russian)
- Template:Ru icon Eye for an eye