Revision as of 04:05, 28 January 2006 editApplejuicefool (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,392 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:05, 28 January 2006 edit undoOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators260,845 edits examplesNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Ideas? ] 04:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC) | Ideas? ] 04:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I wholeheartedly agree with Applejuicefool. I like to see town/city articles that have more information about the town than just the standard census stuff; however, the article should neither read like a promotional Chamber of Commerce piece ''nor'' a political commentary. The additions that Applejuicefool is proposing are all ] additions (or at least they should be). <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 05:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: I think the ] is a pretty good Texas city article; maybe we could incorporate the city infobox that one uses? <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 05:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:05, 28 January 2006
The cultural context information is valid, if unpleasant, as anyone who has visited Big Spring can attest and was not added with the intent of "vandalism" but rather of including a factual description of Big Spring that may differ from that of the local Chamber of Commerce.
Please refer to WP:NPOV. I'm sure that not everyone in this town shares your point of view. Jasmol 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
The fact that not everyone agrees with certain information does not invalidate that information. In addition, the cultural context added provides far more useful information about Big Spring, than census data, geographical coordinates and the fact that a 35 year old movie was filmed there.
Yes, Big Spring sucks, we get that. I've been to Big Spring too many freaking times on stupid high school functions to not get that. But, this article is bad. Incredibly. Needs major cleanup work.
Any desire for a brief history of Big Spring? If nothing else, we could rework the blurb on the Cowboy's Steakhouse menu into something useable :) Applejuicefool 20:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
On the Culture information, it clearly does not stand up to WP:NPOV and should be removed. The description of Big Spring is NOT factual, as asserted in the first paragraph on this page; instead, it is a mass of opinion. "Many people believe..." What people? "The school system is appalling" opinion. "Football takes precedence..." opinion (and I'm a science teacher at BSHS). "The economic base consists largely..." sources? "One of the major career opportunities..." compared to what? Sources? "A high percentage of the population lives in poverty..." what percentage? source? etc. etc. etc. This section of the article is nothing but a slam on Big Spring and should be entirely rewritten. In fact, I plan to do so. Thanks, Applejuicefool 18:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
This weekend I will write some new content for Big Spring. For now, I am going to delete the entire Culture and Economy section on grounds of NPOV violation. You can't completely slam my town in every substantive way using undocumented opinions (as expressed in the previous paragraph) and then say (and I paraphrase) "on the upside it has good barbecue." Applejuicefool 14:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
The Culture & Economics discussion is quite valid. I am a third generation Big Spring resident, born and raised. I love Big Spring. Pointing out some of the challenges that face the city of Big Spring presents a necessary balanced view. If you want advertising copy, the Chamber of Commerce will be all too happy to provide fancy brochures that gloss over all of the difficulties that local residents face.
Ok, I don't want this to turn into a revert war, so I'm going to temporarily leave the content on there to let you explain why your content is balanced. While you're at it, also explain how your content is anything more than your personal opinion and how it fits in with Misplaced Pages policy. According to policy,
- Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. Have you ever read content in a modern, reputable encyclopedia like your Culture and Economics section?
- Avoid bias.
- Misplaced Pages should only publish material that is verifiable and is not original research. If you're basing your information on your own personal experience living in Big Spring or on your own personal discussions with Big Spring residents, you are in violation of this tenet. In other words, according to policy, "One of the keys to writing good encyclopedia articles is to understand that they should refer only to facts, assertions, theories, ideas, claims, opinions, and arguments that have already been published by a reputable publisher."
- Advocacy and controversial material. Please do not write articles that advocate one particular viewpoint on politics, religion, or anything else. By your own words, "Pointing out some of the challenges that face the city of Big Spring presents a necessary balanced view." Necessary for what? It sounds like you have a political agenda in your article. Even if you love Big Spring as you say, writing a Misplaced Pages article to shed light on its flaws is not the purpose of Misplaced Pages.
Incidentally, the first two bullets come from the Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines page, the third from Misplaced Pages:Verifiability and the last from Misplaced Pages:Your first article.
I'm not saying I want the Big Spring article to sound like Chamber of Commerce copy. Whether this endears me to you or not, I am a former Herald reporter and now a high school teacher. I don't have your three generations, but I do know something about both journalistic and academic style and integrity. I want the article to be factual and based on outside research, not a mass of anyone's opinions - yours or the Chamber's or even mine. Applejuicefool 03:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Ok, just moving ahead to give you a glimpse of my ideas for this page. I would like to:
- Rework the intro to give more general information about Big Spring.
- Keep the Geography and Demographics sections as is.
- Remove the Culture and Economics section.
- Add a section on Big Spring history.
- Add a list of Big Spring landmarks.
- Add a list of Big Spring's major businesses and industries.
- Add a list of Big Spring organizations.
- Add a list of Big Spring annual events (Pops, Christmas parade, Rodeo, etc.)
- Add a fair, unbiased treatment of Big Spring's major problems (Population decline, poverty, decline of downtown area, empty buildings, trash, etc.)
Ideas? Applejuicefool 04:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- I wholeheartedly agree with Applejuicefool. I like to see town/city articles that have more information about the town than just the standard census stuff; however, the article should neither read like a promotional Chamber of Commerce piece nor a political commentary. The additions that Applejuicefool is proposing are all verifiable additions (or at least they should be). OhNoitsJamie 05:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think the Corpus_Christi,_Texas is a pretty good Texas city article; maybe we could incorporate the city infobox that one uses? OhNoitsJamie 05:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)