Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:38, 28 January 2006

error: ISO 639 code is required (help)

Ukrainian (украї́нська мо́ва, ukrayins'ka mova, ) is a language of the East Slavic subgroup of the Slavic languages. It is the official state language of Ukraine. Ukrainian uses a Cyrillic alphabet. It shares some vocabulary with the languages of the neighboring Slavic nations, most notably with Belarusian, Polish, Russian and Slovakian.

Ukrainian traces its origins to the Old East Slavic language of the ancient state of Kievan Rus'. The language has persisted despite the two bans by Imperial Russia and political persecution during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Ukrainian has survived mainly due to its broad base among the people of Ukraine, its folklore songs, kobzars, prominent poets like Taras Shevchenko and Lesya Ukrainka.

History

Perspective

Before the eighteenth century the precursor to the modern Ukrainian language was a vernacular language used mostly by peasants and petit bourgeois, existing side-by-side with a literary language of foreign origin, the Church Slavonic evolved from the Old Slavonic language from Bulgaria. Although the spoken Ukrainian language was in no danger of extinction, it was only raised to the level of a language of literature, philosophy and science by being promoted at the expense of a separate "high language", be it Greek, Church Slavonic, Polish, Latin or Russian.

Ivan Kotlyarevsky in 1794 published an epic poem, Eneyida, a burlesque in Ukrainian, based on Vergil's Aeneid. The book turned out to be the first literary work published in the vernacular Ukrainian, becoming an undying classic of Ukrainian literature. The Ukrainian language has a rich history that reflects the history of Ukraine, full of foreign oppression and undying resistance. Ukrainian traces its roots through the mid-fourteenth century as one of the state languages of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, back to the early written evidences of tenth-century Kievan Rus'.

Origin

Until the end of 18th century the written language used in Ukraine was quite different from the spoken one. For this reason, there is no direct data on the origin of the Ukrainian language. One has to rely on indirect methods: analysis of typical mistakes in old manuscripts, comparison of linguistic data with historical, antropological, archeological ones, etc. Because of the difficulty of the question, several versions of the origin of Ukrainian language exist. Some early versions have already been proven wrong by modern linguistics, while others are still being discussed in the academic community.

The first version of the origin was proposed by Mikhail Lomonosov in the middle of the 18th century when modern linguistic studies were not available. Lomonosov assumed existence of the common language spoken by all East Slavic people in the time of Kievan Rus', the language he called Русский (Russkiy) (it should be noted that in the Russian language the word Russkiy (Russian) relates both to what pertains to modern Russia and to Rus', see also Etymology of Rus and derivatives). According to Lomonosov, the differences that subsequently developed between Great Russian and Ukrainian (then called Little Russian) could be explained by the influence of the Polish language when, after the disintegration of the East Slavic state, the lands of Ukraine fell under the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. This theory became a basis of the mainstream scholarship within the Russian Empire, largely due to its political convenience. The theory of "polonization" was supported by the government of the Imperial Russia when in 1876 Ukrainian was banned from printing in the territory of the empire (see Ems Ukaz).

The "polonization" theory was criticised as early as in the first half of the nineteenth by Mykhailo Maxymovych. In fact, the most distinctive features of Ukrainian language are present neither in Russian nor in Polish. Ukrainian and Polish language do share a lot of common or similar words, but so do all Slavic languages, since many words are carried over from the extinct Proto-Slavic language, predecessors of the modern ones. Much smaller part of their common vocabulary can be attributed to the later interaction of the two languages. The "polonization" theory has not been taken seriously by the academic community since the beginning of 20th century, but still has some circulation among anti-Ukrainian organizations and politicians.

Another point of view developed during nineteenth and twentieth centuries by linguists of Imperial Russia and Soviet Union. Similarly to Lomonosov they assume the existence of the common language spoken by East Slavs in the past. But unlike Lomonosov's hypothesis, this theory does not view "polonization" or any other external influence as the main driving force that led to the formation of three different languages: Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian from the common Old East Slavic language. The supporters of this theory disagree, however, about the time when the different languages were formed.

Soviet historiography manifested an ideology of three brotherly East Slavic nations. Soviet scholars tend to admit a difference between Ukrainian and Russian only at later time periods (fourteenth through sixteenth centuries). According to this view, Old East Slavic diverged into Belarusian and Ukrainian to the west (collectively, the Ruthenian language of the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries), and Old Russian to the north-east, after the political boundaries of Kievan Rus’ were redrawn in the fourteenth century. During the time of the incorporation of Ruthenia (Ukraine and Belarus) into the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Ukrainian and Belarusian diverged into identifiably separate languages.

Other scholars see a divergence between the language of Halych-Volhynia and the language of Novgorod-Suzdal by the 1100s, assuming that before the 12th century the two languages were practically indistinguishable. Some European and American linguists concur (see, for example the articlein Encyclopedia Britannica). This point of view is, however, in varience with some historical data. In fact, several East Slavic tribes, such as Polans, Drevlyans, Severians, Dulebes (that later likely became Volhynians and Buzhans), White Croatians, Tivertsi and Ulichs lived on the territory of today's Ukraine long before the 12th century. It is notable that Ukrainian features were recognizable in the southern dialects of Old East Slavic as far back as the language can be documented.

Some researches admitting the differencies between the dialects spoken by East Slavic tribes in 10th and 11th centuries still consider them as "regional manifestations of a common language" (see, for instance, the article by Vasyl Nimchuk). In contrast, Ahathandel Krymskyi and Alexei Shakhmatov assumed the existence of the common spoken language of Easten Slavs only in pre-historic times. According to their point of view, the disintegration of the Old East Slavic language took place in 8th or at the beginning of 9th century.

The Ukrainian linguist Stepan Smal-Stockyi went even further: he denied the existence of common Old East Slavic language at any time in the past. Similar point of view was shared by Yevhen Tymchenko, Vsevolod Hantsov, Olena Kurylo, Ivan Ohienko and others. According to this theory, the dialects of East Slavic tribes derived gradually from the common Proto-Slavic language without any intermediate stages during 6st - 9th centuries. The Ukrainian language was formed by mixing and convergence of tribal dialects mostly due to intensive migration of the population within the territory of today's Ukraine in the later historical periods. This point of view was also confirmed by phonological studies of Yurii Shevelov. This theory gains growing number of supporters among Ukrainian scientists.

See also Ruthenian language.

Ancient history

Beyond the polemics between several ideological conceptions, the continuous presence of Slavic settlements in Ukraine, since at least the sixth century, provides an underlying ethno-linguistic factual basis for the origins of the Ukrainian language. The westernmost areas of modern-day Ukraine lay to the south from the postulated homeland of the original Slavs.

Immigration of Slavic tribes to the Western Slavic and Southern Slavic portions of Eastern Europe led to the dissolution of Early Common Slavic into three groups by the seventh century (East Slavic, West Slavic, and South Slavic). During this time period, some East Slavic elements could have already provided a Slavic identity to the Antes civilization (of which nothing but an Iranian name is known).

Kievan Rus' and Halych-Volhynia

During the Khazar period, the territory of Ukraine, settled at that time by Iranian (post-Scythian), Turkic (post-Hunnic, proto-Bulgarian), and Finno-Ugric (proto-Hungarian) tribes, was progressively Slavicized by several waves of migration from the Slavic north. Finally, the Varangian ruler of Novgorod, called Oleg, seized Kiev (Kyiv) and established the political entity of Rus'. Some theorists see an early Ukrainian stage in language development here; others term this era Early East Slavic or Old Ruthenian/Rus'ian. Russian theorists tend to amalgamate Rus' to the modern nation of Russia, and call this linguistic era Old Russian. Some hold that linguistic unity over Rus' was not present, but tribal diversity in language was present.

The era of Rus' is the subject of some linguistic controversy, as the language of much of the literature was purely or heavily Old Slavonic. At the same time, most legal documents throughout Rus' were written in a purely East Slavic language (supposed to be based on the Kiev dialect of that epoch). Scholarly controversies over earlier development aside, literary records from Rus' testify to substantial divergence between Russian and Ruthenian/Rusyn forms of the Ukrainian language as early as the era of Rus'. One vehicle of this divergence (or widening divergence) was the large scale appropriation of the Old Slavonic language in the northern reaches of Rus' and of the Polish language at the territory of modern Ukraine. As evidenced by the contemporary chronicles, the ruling princes of Halych and Kiev called themselves "Russkie," which contrasts sharply with the lack of ethnic self-appellation for the area until the mid-nineteenth century.

One prominent example of this north-south divergence in Rus' from around 1200, was the epic, The Tale of Igor's Campaign. Like other examples of Old Russian literature (for example, Byliny, the Russian Primary Chronicle), it survived only in Northern Russia (Upper Volga belt) and was probably written there. It shows dialectal features characteristic of Severian dialect with the exception of two words which were wrongly interpreted by early nineteenth-century German scholars as Polish loan words.

Post-independence: Lithuania/Poland, Muscovy/Russia, and Austro-Hungary

After the fall of Halych-Volhynia, Ukrainians mainly fell under the rule of Lithuania, then Poland. Local autonomy of both rule and language was a marked feature of Lithuanian rule. Polish rule, which came mainly later, was accompanied by a more assimilationist policy. The Polish language has had heavy influences on Ukrainian (and on Belarusian). As the Ukrainian language developed further, some borrowings from Tatar and Turkish occurred. Ukrainian culture and language flourished in the sixteenth and first half of the seventeenth century, when Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Ukrainian was also the official language of Ukrainian provinces of the Crown of Polish Kingdom. Among many schools established in that time, the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Kiev-Mogila Academy), founded by the Orthodox Metropolitan Peter Mogila (Petro Mohyla), was the most important.

In the anarchy of the Khmelnytsky Uprising and following wars, Ukrainian high culture was sent into a long period of steady decline. In the aftermath, the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy was taken over by Russia. Most of the remaining Ukrainian schools also switched to Polish or Russian, in the territories controlled by these respective countries, which was followed by a new wave of Polonization and Russification of the native nobility. Gradually the official language of Ukrainian provinces under Poland was changed to Polish, while the Russian part of Ukraine used Russian widely.

After the partitions of Poland, the Ukrainian language was banned from printing by Alexander II of Russia, in the Ems Ukaz, which retarded the literary development of the Ukrainian language. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was clear that the majority of the Ukrainians chose not to call their language Rus’ka mova, 'Ruthenian language' (as it had been called during the time of Polish Rule; it was commonly referred to in the Russian Empire as Malorusskij yazyk, 'Little Russian language') and instead called it Ukrayins’ka mova 'Ukrainian language'. In the census of 1897 the following picture emerged, with Ukrainian being the second most spoken language of the Empire.

Ukrainian speakers in the Russian Empire

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Languages spoken in Russian Empire governorates (guberniya) with more than 100,000 Ukrainian speakers, in 1897. In accordance with that time's prevailing terminology, now obsolete, the census recorded the Ukrainian language as Malorusskiy, 'Little Russian' and the Russian language as Velikorusskiy, 'Great Russian'.

As a result, the imperial authorities officially legalised the language in 1904, and by the time of the First World War a substantial number of rural schools had begun teaching the language. At the same time, in Austrian-ruled Galicia and Bukovina, Ukrainian was widely used in education and in official documents.

Soviet era

During the seven-decade-long Soviet era, the Ukrainian language held the formal position of the principal local language in the Ukrainian SSR. However, practice was often a different story: Ukrainian always had to compete with Russian, and the attitudes of the Soviet leadership towards the Ukrainian varied from encouragement and tolerance to discouragement and, at times, suppression.

Officially, there was no state language in the Soviet Union. Still it was implicitly understood in the hopes of minority nations that Ukrainian would be used in the Ukrainian SSR, Uzbek would be used in the Uzbek SSR, and so on. However, Russian was used in all parts of the Soviet Union and a special term, "a language of inter-ethnic communication" was coined to denote its status. In reality, Russian was in a privileged position in the USSR and was the state official language in everything but formal name—although formally all languages were held up as equal. Often the Ukrainian language was frowned upon or quietly discouraged, which led to the gradual decline in its usage. Partly due to this suppression, in many parts of Ukraine, notably most urban areas of the east and south, Russian remains more widely spoken than Ukrainian.

Soviet language policy in Ukraine is divided into six policy periods

1. Ukrainianization and tolerance (1921–late-1932)
2. Persecution and russification (1933–1957)
3. Khrushchev thaw (1958–1962)
4. The Shelest period: limited progress (1963–1972)
5. The Shcherbytsky period: gradual suppression (1973–1989)
6. Gorbachev and perestroika (1990–1991)

Ukrainianization and tolerance

Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Russian Empire was broken up. In different parts of the former empire, several nations, including Ukrainians, developed a renewed sense of national identity. In the chaotic post-revolutionary years, Ukraine went through several short-lived independent and quasi-independent states, and the Ukrainian language, for the first time in modern history, gained usage in most government affairs. Initially, this trend continued under the Bolshevik government of the Soviet Union, which in a political struggle with the old regime had their own reasons to encourage the national movements of the former Russian Empire. While trying to ascertain and consolidate its power, the Bolshevik government was by far more concerned about many political oppositions connected to the pre-revolutionary order than about the national movements inside the former empire.

The widening use of Ukrainian further developed in the first years of Bolshevik rule into a policy called Korenization. The government pursued a policy of Ukrainianization (Ukrayinizatsiya, actively promoting the Ukrainian language), both in the government and among party personnel, and an impressive education program which raised the literacy of the Ukrainophone rural areas. Newly-generated academic efforts from the period of independence were co-opted by the Bolshevik government. The party and government apparatus was mostly Russian-speaking but were encouraged to learn the Ukrainian language. Simultaneously, the newly-literate ethnic Ukrainians migrated to the cities, which became rapidly largely Ukrainianized—in both population and in education.

The policy even reached those regions of southern Russian SFSR where the ethnic Ukrainian population was significant, particularly the areas by the Don River and especially Kuban in the North Caucasus. Ukrainian language teachers, just graduated from expanded institutions of higher education in Soviet Ukraine, were dispatched to these regions to staff newly opened Ukrainian schools or to teach Ukrainian as a second language in Russian schools. A string of local Ukrainian-language publications were started and departments of Ukrainian studies were opened in colleges. Overall, these policies were implemented in thirty-five raions {administrative districts) in southern Russia.

Persecution and russification

Soviet policy towards the Ukrainian language changed abruptly in late 1932 and early 1933, when Stalin had already established his firm control over the party and, therefore, the Soviet state. In December, 1932, the regional party cells received a telegram signed by Molotov and Stalin with an order to immediately reverse the korenization policies. The telegram condemned Ukrainianization as ill-considered and harmful and demanded to "immediately halt Ukrainianization in raions (districts), switch all Ukrainianized newspapers, books and publications into Russian and prepare by autumn of 1933 for the switching of schools and instruction into Russian".

The following years were characterized by massive repression and many hardships for the Ukrainian language and people. Some historians, especially of Ukraine, emphasize that the repression was applied earlier and more fiercely in Ukraine than in other parts of the Soviet Union, and were therefore anti-Ukrainian; others assert that Stalin's goal was the generic crushing of any dissent, rather that targeting the Ukrainians in particular.

The Stalinist era also marked the beginning of the Soviet policy of encouraging Russian as the language of (inter-ethnic) Soviet communication. Although Ukrainian continued to be used (in print, education, radio and later television programs), it lost its primary place in advanced learning and republic-wide media. Ukrainian was considered to be of secondary importance, and an excessive attachment to it was considered a sign of nationalism and so "politically incorrect". At the same time, however, the new Soviet Constitution adopted in 1936 stipulated that teaching in schools should be in native languages.

The major repression started in 1929–30, when a large group of Ukrainian intelligentsia was arrested and most were executed. In Ukrainian history, this group is often referred to as "Executed Renaissance" (Ukrainian: розстріляне відродження). "Ukrainian bourgeois nationalism" was declared to be the primary problem in Ukraine. The terror peaked in 1933, four to five years before the Soviet-wide "Great Purge," which, for Ukraine, was a second blow. The vast majority of leading scholars and cultural leaders of Ukraine were liquidated, as were the "Ukrainianized" and "Ukrainianizing" portions of the Communist party. Soviet Ukraine's autonomy was completely destroyed by the late 1930s. In its place, the glorification of Russia as the first nation to throw off the capitalist yoke had begun, accompanied by the migration of Russian workers into parts of Ukraine which were undergoing industrialization and mandatory instruction of classic Russian language and literature. Ideologists warned of over-glorifying Ukraine's Cossack past, and supported the closing of Ukrainian cultural institutions and literary publications. The systematic assault upon Ukrainian identity in culture and education, combined with effects of an artificial famine (Holodomor) upon the peasantry—the backbone of the nation—dealt Ukrainian language and identity a crippling blow from which it would not completely recover.

This policy succession was repeated in the Soviet occupation of Western Ukraine. In 1939, and again in the late 1940s, a policy of Ukrainianization was implemented. By the early 1950s, Ukrainian was persecuted and a campaign of Russification began.

The Khrushchev thaw

After the death of Stalin (1953), a general policy of relaxing the language policies of the past was implemented (1958 to 1963). The Khrushchev era which followed saw a policy of relatively lenient concessions to development of the languages on the local and republican level, though its results in Ukraine did not go nearly as far as those of the Soviet policy of Ukrainianization in the 1920s. Journals and encyclopedic publications advanced in the Ukrainian language during the Khrushchev era.

Yet, the 1958 school reform that allowed parents to choose the language of primary instruction for their children, unpopular among the circles of the national intelligentsia in parts of the USSR, meant that non-Russian languages would slowly give way to Russian in light of the pressures of survival and advancement. The gains of the past, already largely reversed by the Stalin era, were offset by the liberal attitude towards the requirement to study the local languages (the requirement to study Russian remained). Parents were free to choose the language of study of their children, and they often chose Russian, which reinforced the resulting Russification. In this sense, some analysts argue that it was not the "oppression" or "persecution", but rather the lack of protection against the expansion of Russian language that contributed to the relative decline of Ukrainian in 1970s and 1980s. According to this view, it was inevitable that successful careers required a good command of Russian, while knowledge of Ukrainian was not vital, so it was common for Ukrainian parents to send their children to Russian-language schools, even though Ukrainian-language schools were available. While in the Russian-language schools within the republic, the Ukrainian was supposed to be learned as a second language at comparable level, the instruction of other subjects was in Russian and, as a results, students upon graduation had a superior command in Russian than in Ukrainian. Additionally, in some areas of the republic, the attitude towards teaching and learning of Ukrainian in schools was relaxed and it was, sometimes, considered a subject of secondary importance and even a waiver from studying it was sometimes given under various, ever expanding, circumstances.

The complete suppression of all expressions of separatism or Ukrainian nationalism also contributed to lessening interest toward Ukrainian. Some people who persistently used Ukrainian on a daily basis were oftentimes perceived as though as they were expressing sympathy towards, or even being members of, the political opposition. This, combined with advantages given by the Russian fluency and usage, made Russian a primary language of choice for many Ukrainians, while Ukrainian was more of a hobby. In any event, the mild liberalization in Ukraine and elsewhere was stifled by new suppression of freedoms at the end of the Khrushchev era (1963) when a policy of gradually creeping suppression of Ukrainian was re-instituted.

Later, the Soviet Ukrainian language policy was divided into two eras: first, the Shelest period (early 1960s to early 1970s), which was relatively liberal towards the development of the Ukrainian language. The second era, the policy of Shcherbytsky (early 1970s to early 1990s), was one of gradual suppression of the Ukrainian language.

The Shelest period

The Communist Party leader Petro Shelest pursued a policy of defending Ukraine's interests within the Soviet Union. He proudly promoted the beauty of the Ukrainian language and developed plans to expand the role of Ukrainian in higher education. He was removed, however, after only a brief reign, for being too lenient on Ukrainian nationalism.

The Shcherbytsky period

The new party boss, Shcherbytsky, purged the local party, was fierce in suppressing dissent, and used the Russian language at official functions even at local levels. His policy of Russification was lessened only slightly after 1985.

Gorbachev and perestroika

The management of dissent by the local Ukrainian Communist Party was more fierce and thorough than in other parts of the Soviet Union. As a result, at the start of the Gorbachev reforms, Ukraine under Shcherbytsky was slower to liberalize than Russia itself.

Although Ukrainian still remained the native language for the majority in the nation on the eve of Ukrainian independence, a significant share of ethnic Ukrainians were Russified. The Russian language was the dominant vehicle, not just of government function, but of the media, commerce, and modernity itself. This was substantially less the case for western Ukraine, which escaped the artificial famine, Great Purge, and most of Stalinism. And this region became the piedmont of a hearty, if only partial renaissance of the Ukrainian language during independence

Independence in the modern era

Since 1991, independent Ukraine has made Ukrainian the only official state language and implemented government policies to broaden the use of Ukrainian. The educational system in Ukraine has been transformed over the first decade of independence from a system that is partly Ukrainian to one that is overwhelmingly so. The government has also mandated a progressively increased role for Ukrainian in the media and commerce. In some cases, the abrupt changing of the language of instruction in institutions of secondary and higher education, led to the charges of Ukrainianization, raised mostly by the Russian-speaking population. However, the transition lacked most of the controversies that surrounded the de-russification in several of the other former Soviet Republics.

With time, most residents, including ethnic Russians, people of mixed origin, and Russian-speaking Ukrainians started to self-identify as Ukrainian nationals, even though remaining largely Russophone. The state became truly bilingual as most of its population had already been. The Russian language still dominates the print media in most of Ukraine and private radio and TV broadcasting in the eastern, southern, and to a lesser degree central regions. The state-controlled broadcast media became exclusively Ukrainian but that had little influence on the audience because of their programs' low ratings. There are few obstacles to the usage of Russian in commerce and it is de facto still occasionally used in the government affairs.

In the 2001 census, 67.5% of the country population named Ukrainian as their native language (a 2.8% increase from 1989), while 29.6% named Russian (a 3.2% decrease). It should be noted, though, that for many Ukrainians (of various ethnic descent), the term native language may not necessarily associate with the language they use more frequently. The overwhelming majority of ethnic Ukrainians consider the Ukrainian language native, including those who often speak Russian and Surzhyk (a blend of Russian vocabulary with Ukrainian grammar and pronunciation). For example, according to the official 2001 census data approximately 75% of Kiev's population responded "Ukrainian" to the native language (ridna mova) census question, and roughly 25% responded "Russian". On the other hand, when the question "What language do you use in everyday life?" was asked in the sociological survey, the Kievans' answers were distributed as follows : "mostly Russian": 52%, "both Russian and Ukrainian in equal measure": 32%, "mostly Ukrainian": 14%, "exclusively Ukrainian": 4.3%.

History of Ukrainian literature

See Ukrainian literature

The literary Ukrainian language, which was preceded by the Old East Slavic literature, may be subdivided into three stages: old Ukrainian (twelfth to fourteenth centuries), middle Ukrainian (fourteenth to eighteenth centuries), and modern Ukrainian (end of the eighteenth century to the present). Much literature has been written in the eras of old and middle Ukrainian: legal acts, polemical articles, science treatises and fiction of all sorts.

Influential literary figures in the development of the modern Ukrainian literature included the philosopher Hryhori Skovoroda, Mykola Kostomarov, Mikhaylo Kotsyubinsky, Taras Shevchenko, Ivan Franko, and Lesia Ukrainka. The literary language is based on the dialect of the Poltava region, with heavy influence of the dialect spoken in the west, notably Galicia (Halychyna). For most of its history, Russian letters were used for written Ukrainian (for example, by Shevchenko). The modern Ukrainian alphabet and orthography, which introduced the distinct letters і, ї, є, ґ, and modified the usage of и, was developed in the late nineteenth century in Austrian-controlled Galicia.

Current usage

The Ukrainian language is currently emerging from a long period of decline. Although there are almost fifty million ethnic Ukrainians worldwide, including 37.5 million in Ukraine (77.8% of the total population), only in western Ukraine is the Ukrainian language prevalent. In Kiev, both languages are spoken, a notable shift from the recent past when the city was primarily Russian speaking. The shift is caused, largely, by an influx of the rural population and migrants from the western regions of Ukraine but also by some Kievans' turning to use the language they speak at home more widely in everyday matters. In northern and central Ukraine, Russian is the language of the urban population, while in rural areas Ukrainian is much more common. In the south and the east of Ukraine, Russian is prevalent even in rural areas, and in Crimea, Ukrainian is almost absent.

Use of the Ukrainian language in Ukraine can be expected to increase, as the rural population (still overwhelmingly Ukrainophone) migrates into the cities and the Ukrainian language enters into wider use in central Ukraine. The literary tradition of Ukrainian is also developing rapidly overcoming the consequences of the long period when its development was hindered by either direct suppression or simply the lack of the state encouragement policies.

Dialects of Ukrainian

Several modern dialects of Ukrainian exist , :

• Northern (polissian) dialects :
  • Eastpolissian dialect spoken in Chernihiv oblast (excluding south-eastern districts), in the northern part of Sumy Oblast, and in south-eastern districts of Kiev Oblast as well as in adjacent districts of Russian Federation: south-western part of Bryansk Oblast (the area around Starodub), as well as in some places of Kursk Oblast, Voronezh Oblast and Belgorod Oblast. . No linguigraphical border defined, volcabulary differs as one approaches to Russia or Ukraine porper. Both grammar sets are thus applicable .
  • Central polissian dialect spoken in the north-western part of Kiev Oblast, in the nothern part of Zhytomyr Oblast and north-eastern part of Rivne Oblast .
  • Westpolissian dialect in northern part of Volyn Oblast, noth-western part of Rivne Oblast as well as in adjacent districts of Brest Voblast of Belarus. The latter area uses Belarusian grammar. Considered to be dialect of Belarusian as well.

• South-East dialects :
  • Serednionaddniprianskyi dialect is base of the Standard Ukrainian (spoken in the central part of the nation, and in southern and eastern part of Kiev Oblast). Traditionally, the variation of language naturally spoken in Cherkasy, Poltava and Kiev areas is considered to be the closest to the "standard" Ukrainian.
  • Slobozhanskyi dialect spoken in the Kharkiv, Sumy, Luhansk, Northern part of Donetsk regions as well as Voronezh and Belgorod regions of Russia. . Formed from gradual mixture of Russian and Ukrainian, the language slowly shifts from Ukrainian to Russian as one travels northwards or eastwards (and vice versa) with no linguigraphical border. Both grammar sets are applicable
  • Steppe dialect spoken in South and South-East Ukraine. Originally the main language of the Zaporozhian Cossacks. .
  • Kuban dialect (known locally as Balachka) spoken in the Kuban region of Russia, by Kuban Cossacks, descendents of the original Zaporozhian host after they migrated there. Formed from gradual mixture of Russian and Ukrainian. Predominantly Russian volcabulary is used along with Russian grammar. Strongly varies from one area to another.
• South-West dialects :
  • Podillian dialect. Spoken in the southern parts of Vinnytsia and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts, in the nothern part of Odessa Oblast and in the adjacent districts of Cherkasy Oblast, Kirovohrad Oblast and Mykolaiv Oblast .
  • Volynian dialect spoken in the Rivne, Volyn and parts of Zhytomyr and Ternopil regions, as well as around Chelm in Poland.
  • Pokuttia (Bukovynian) dialect. Spoken in the Chernivtsi Oblast of Ukraine. Shows some destinct volcabulary borrowed from Romanian.
  • Naddnistrianskyi dialect. Considered to be the main Galician dialect, spoken in the Lviv Ternopil and Ivano-Frankivsk Oblasts. Destinguishes itself from the large amount of Polish features and some German Volcabulary.
  • Nadsianskyi dialect. Spoken in the border area between Ukraine and Poland around the San river valley.
  • Hutsul dialect. Spoken in the extreame south of the Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast (as well parts of Chernivtsi and Transcarpathian Oblasts, on the northern slope of the Carpathian ridge.
  • Boyko dialect. Spoken on the Northern side of the Carpathian ridge of the Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk. As well as across the border in the Subcarpathian Voivodship of Poland
  • Lemko dialect. Spoken outside Ukraine in the Prešov Kraj of Slovakia along the Southern side of the Carpathian ridge.
  • Transcarpathian dialect. Spoken in the Transcarpathian Oblast.
    • Pryashiv-rusyn dialect spoken Ukrainian (Rusyn) in Pryashiv region Slovakia as well as some émigré communities (some linguists consider as separate Rusyn language)
    • Bačka-rusyn (бачвансько-русинський) dialect spoken Ukrainian (Rusyn) in north-western Serbia and eastern Croatia (Also considered as a separate Rusin language, one of the official languages of the Serbian Autonomous Province of Vojvodina).

Ukrainian is also spoken by a large émigré population, particularly in Canada (see Canadian Ukrainian), United States and several countries of South America like Argentina and Brazil. The founders of this population primarily emigrated from Galicia, which used to be part of Austro-Hungary before World War One, and belonged to Poland between the World Wars. The language spoken by most of them is the Galician dialect of Ukrainian from the first half of the twentieth century. Compared with modern Ukrainian, the vocabulary of Ukrainians outside Ukraine reflects less influence of Russian, but often contains many loan words from the local language.

Ukrainophone population

The Ukrainian is a language of speach by ethnic Ukrainians that is approximately 36,894,000 people in the world. Most of the countries are either ex-USSR where a lot of Ukrainians migrated. Canada and the United States are also home to a large Ukrainian population. Broken up by country (to the nearest thousand):

1. Ukraine 31,058,000
2. Russia 1,815,000
3. Brazil 900,000
4. Kazakhstan 898,000
5. United States 844,000
6. Moldova 600,000
7. Hungary 300,000
8. Belarus 291,000
9. Canada 175,000
10. Uzbekistan 153,000
11. Poland 150,000
12. Kyrgyzstan 109,000
13. Slovakia 100,000
14. Argentina 100,000
15. Latvia 78,000
16. Romania 57,600
17. Georgia 52,000
18. Lithuania 45,000
19. Tajikistan 41,000
20. Turkmenistan 37,000
21. Azerbaijan 32,000
22. Paraguay 26,000
23. Estonia 21,000
24. Armenia 8,000
25. Serbia and Montenegro 3,000

(Source, unless specified: Ethnologue )

The Ukrainian language is the official language of Ukraine. The language is also one of three official languages of the breakaway Moldovan republic of Transnistria (Source: The Constitution of Transnistria, Article 12 )

Language structure

Cyrillic letters in this article are romanized using scientific transliteration.

Comparative grammar

Old East Slavic (and Russian) o in many cases corresponds to Ukrainian i, as in pod->pid "under". The historical o is sometimes restored in certain declensions of Ukrainian words, such as rik (nom): rotsi (loc) "year". Also, the letter Г renders different consonants in Old East Slavic and Ukrainian, see language notes in Cyrillic alphabet. Ukrainian Г is the voiced cognate of Old East Slavic Х (and so is often transliterated as Latin h), while the Russian (and Old East Slavic) one is pronounced the same as English g, as in good. Russian speakers from Ukraine often use the 'soft' Ukrainian Г, in place of the 'hard' Old East Slavic one.

Ukrainian case endings are somewhat different from Old East Slavic, and the vocabulary includes a large overlay of Polish terminology. Russian na pervom etazhe "on the first floor" is in the prepositional case. The Ukrainian corresponding expression is na pershomu poversi. -omu is the standard locative (prepositional) ending, but variants in -im are common in dialect and poetry, and allowed by the standards bodies. The x of Ukrainian poverx has mutated into s under the influence of the soft vowel i (k is similarly mutable into ts in final positions). Ukrainian is the only modern East Slavic language which preserves the vocative case.

Phonetics

The Ukrainian language has six vowels, , , , , , , and two semivowels , .

A number of the consonants come in three forms: hard, soft (palatalized) and long, for example, , , and or , , and . Ukrainians tend to pronounce long sounds where the letters are doubled in other languages, English or Russian, for example.

The divergence in pronunciation of the Ukrainian and Russian (Cyrillic г) has already been discussed above. Another phonetic divergence between the two languages is the pronunciation of /v/ (Cyrillic в). While in Russian it is pronounced as , in Ukrainian it is pronounced as (a labiodental approximant somewhat in between the in "victory" and the in "water").

Alphabet

Template:Ukrainian alphabet

The alphabet of the Ukrainian language consists of 33 letters and is derived from the Cyrillic writing system. The modern Ukrainian alphabet is the result of a number of proposed alphabetic reforms from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, in Ukraine under the Russian Empire, in Austrian Galicia, and later in Soviet Ukraine. It was officially established at a 1927 international Orthographic Conference in Kharkiv (although the Ukrainian letter ge, ґ, was banned in the Soviet Union from 1933 until 1990).

The alphabet comprises thirty-three letters, representing thirty-eight phonemes (meaningful units of sound), and an additional sign—the apostrophe. Ukrainian orthography is based on the phonemic principle, with one letter generally corresponding to one phoneme, although there are a number of exceptions. The orthography also has cases where the semantic, historical, and morphological principles are applied.

The letter щ represents two consonants . The combination of with some of the vowels is also represented by a single letter (=я, =є, =ї, =ю), while =йо and the rare regional =йи are written using two letters. These iotated vowel letters and a special soft sign change a preceding consonant from hard to soft. An apostrophe is used to indicate the hardness of the sound in the cases when normally the vowel would change the consonant to soft.

A letter is repeated to indicate that the sound is long.

The phonemes and do not have dedicated letters in the alphabet and are rendered with the digraphs дз and дж, respectively. is pronounced like English ds in pods, is like g in huge.

See also Drahomanivka, Ukrainian Latin alphabet.

See also

• Romanization of Ukrainian describes systems of representing Ukrainian language using the Latin alphabet.
• Surzhyk
• Ukrainianization

References

• . ISBN 3-533-02787-2. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help). Ukrainian translation is partially available online.
• . ISBN 9665800825. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help), (in Ukrainian). Available online.
• . ISBN 0-8020-5809-6. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
• Василь Німчук. Періодизація як напрямок дослідження генези та історії української мови. Мовознавство. 1997.- Ч.6.-С.3-14; 1998.
• Микола Лесюк "Різнотрактування історії української мови".
• "What language is spoken in Ukraine", in Welcome to Ukraine, 2003, 1.
• All-Ukrainian population census 2001
• Конституція України (Constitution of Ukraine) (in Ukrainian), 1996, English translation (excerpts).

1. "http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9074133?query=Ukrainian%20language&ct=". November 19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); External link in |title= (help)
2. "http://ukrcensus.gov.ua/rus/results/general/language/city_kyiv/". November 19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); External link in |title= (help)
3. "Welcome to Ukraine (See above)". November 19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)

• 1897 census

External links

• Ukrainian dictionary (from/to English, Russian, Belarusian, Polish)
• Ukrainian–English Dictionary
• Ukrainian English Dictionary from Webster's Online Dictionary - the Rosetta Edition
• Ukrainian Language Online Resources: Language Profile, Dictionaries, Grammar and Language History
• English-Ukrainian Dictionary (Beta)
• Ukrainian Language Online Course
• Radio Canada International daily Ukrainian language news broadcasts and transcripts
• Ethnologue report for Ukrainian
• Dialects of Ukrainian language
• Linguistic map of Ukraine, Ethnologue
• "Kiev or Kyiv: language an issue in Ukraine" - article in the Christian Science Monitor
• Ukrainian language - the third official? - Ukrayinska Pravda, 28 november 2005
• Lingvoforum.net Ukrainian language

• East Slavic languages
• Ukrainian language
• Languages of Hungary
• Languages of Ukraine
• Languages of Russia