| Revision as of 12:48, 21 July 2010 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Apparent 3RR violation: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:28, 21 July 2010 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →WP:ARBPIA notification: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Per the complaint at ] you seem to have broken ] on ]. If you want to avoid sanctions, you should reply at the noticeboard and promise to stop edit-warring on this article. ] (]) 12:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | Per the complaint at ] you seem to have broken ] on ]. If you want to avoid sanctions, you should reply at the noticeboard and promise to stop edit-warring on this article. ] (]) 12:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ] notification == | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged ]. ] (]) 20:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:28, 21 July 2010
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Muzicalb, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Lebanon. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 01:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
July 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. nableezy - 05:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC) 05:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- You have been reported to the edit-warring noticeboard, you can see this here. nableezy - 06:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict
This is totally unacceptable behavior.
- The source says "reluctance may have stemmed from a fear of reprisals."
- You changed it to "reluctance may have stemmed from a fear of violent reprisals"
You need to stop this kind of behavior immediately. Sean.hoyland - talk 06:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Apparent 3RR violation
Per the complaint at WP:AN3#User:Muzicalb reported by User:Nableezy (Result: ) you seem to have broken WP:3RR on United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. If you want to avoid sanctions, you should reply at the noticeboard and promise to stop edit-warring on this article. EdJohnston (talk) 12:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA notification
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here. EdJohnston (talk) 20:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)