Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Fashion/to do: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Fashion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:24, 1 July 2010 editArtemis-Arethusa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,778 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:48, 22 August 2010 edit undoPhoenix and Winslow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,909 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
* Encourage editors who refer to 'current fashion' or similar to include a reference date. When such an entry is found, update it if needed with a reference date if such can be established. An example, as of 14 Aug 08, is the article on ]. * Encourage editors who refer to 'current fashion' or similar to include a reference date. When such an entry is found, update it if needed with a reference date if such can be established. An example, as of 14 Aug 08, is the article on ].
* Can I suggest a merging of the articles ] and, oh, ] or whichever is appropriate? The first article seems a bit thin and could probably do with being folded into something more comprehensive. Also, it was a complete orphan -- the link above is its first anywhere -- and I only chanced across it from a category.] (]) 23:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC) * Can I suggest a merging of the articles ] and, oh, ] or whichever is appropriate? The first article seems a bit thin and could probably do with being folded into something more comprehensive. Also, it was a complete orphan -- the link above is its first anywhere -- and I only chanced across it from a category.] (]) 23:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
* I recommend participation by fashion editors on the ] article. This is fashion footwear worn by such celebrities as ], ], ] and ]. In most of the world it's a well-recognized designer brand, but in Australia and New Zealand, it's considered a "generic term" and several editors, possibly representing knockoff brands or even counterfeiters, have been POV-pushing the generic term. Please help. ] (]) 13:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:48, 22 August 2010