| Revision as of 09:20, 5 January 2007 editTimtrent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers131,487 edits task from Peer Review← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:02, 11 September 2010 edit undoJblossom (talk | contribs)99 edits Added comment about article lacking reference to citation of physical evidence |
| (19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{tasks |
|
{{tasks |
|
|requests= |
|
|requests= |
|
|
|copyedit=* From Peer Review ''One thing I would note is that grammar and phrasing are very important for "Featured Articles." I noticed a few phrases in the introduction that were awkward at best. <s>Example: "The collapse of 7 World Trade Center (not hit by any plane)..." In this case, the interjection would flow much better if it was "which was not hit by a plane", or perhaps it should be removed entirely.</s> The whole article should be examined for tone by a seasoned editor.'' |
|
|copyedit= |
|
|
|wikify= |
|
|wikify= |
|
|merge= |
|
|merge= |
|
|cleanup=*The citations have got out of hand. The various variations of the <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> template need to be used, but there seem to be a great number which are imperfectly cited. Please pick up any that simply show as a url and visit (eg) ] to determine the most appropriate template to put inside the ref. |
|
|cleanup=*The citations have got out of hand. The various variations of the <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> template need to be used, but there seem to be a great number which are imperfectly cited. Please pick up any that simply show as a url and visit (eg) ] to determine the most appropriate template to put inside the ref. This is reinforced by the most recent Peer Review comment about consistency. The full set of templates are at ] |
|
|
|
|
|
*The ref for ''In response to concerns about the destruction of evidence, W. Gene Corley, head of the Building Performance Assessment Team on the site, stated, that "The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples."'' at http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full02/mar06/corley.htm does not lead to the expected story |
|
*The ref for ''In response to concerns about the destruction of evidence, W. Gene Corley, head of the Building Performance Assessment Team on the site, stated, that "The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples."'' at http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full02/mar06/corley.htm does not lead to the expected story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*This article makes no reference to the only cited scientific examination of actual materials for the presence of explosive materials claimed by supporters of the controlled demolition theory. That study by Harrit et al. found the presence of unexploded nanothermite materials. |
|
*''Also I think this sentence is too suggestive and is in need of some neutrality: "Jones concentrates on the physical implausibility of the official explanation and on aspects of the collapses that seem easier to explain with controlled demolition."'' from Peer Review. Please consider, edit as needed, and remove from here. When complete please ensure thsi is acknowledged on the Peer Review page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|expand=*Fix this reference: ''Griffin, David Ray in The Hidden History (will fix ref).'' |
|
|expand= |
|
|
|disambiguation= |
|
|disambiguation= |
|
|stubs= |
|
|stubs= |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
|npov= |
|
|npov= |
|
|verify= |
|
|verify= |
|
|other=Continually monitor the Peer Review feedback, discuss it and incorporate the agreed items |
|
|other=*Continually monitor the Peer Review feedback, discuss it and incorporate the agreed items, making sure feedback is left on the Peer Review page |
|
|
*Examine ] and determine whether they fit and where they fit. and add them if appropriate, giving feedback on completion |
|
}} |
|
}} |
