Revision as of 12:34, 4 May 2010 editLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 editsm Protected Bishop Hill (blog): Edit warring / Content dispute: Talk page discussion / afd / etc. has not abated the revert war. ( (indefinite) (indefinite))← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:35, 15 September 2010 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 editsm Unprotected Bishop Hill (blog): move war concluded | ||
(78 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] {{R from merge}} | |||
{{multiple issues|orphan =April 2010|notability =April 2010|POV =April 2010}} | |||
{{Infobox website | |||
| name = Bishop Hill | |||
| logo = | |||
| screenshot = | |||
| collapsible = | |||
| collapsetext = | |||
| caption = | |||
| url = http://bishophill.squarespace.com/ | |||
| alexa = | |||
| commercial = | |||
| type = ] | |||
| language = | |||
| registration = | |||
| owner = | |||
| author = ] | |||
| launch date = November 21, 2006 | |||
| current status = | |||
| revenue = | |||
| slogan = A dissentient afflicted with the malady of thought | |||
| content license = | |||
}} | |||
'''Bishop Hill''' is a ] operated by ], author of '']''.<ref name="Webster_2010-03-23_Times">{{cite web | |||
| url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7071751.ece | |||
| title = Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, ‘has a conflict of interest’ | |||
| last = Webster | |||
| first = Ben | |||
| authorlink = | |||
| coauthors = | |||
| work = ] | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| date = 2010-03-23 | |||
| format = | |||
| language= | |||
| doi = | |||
| accessdate = 2010-04-22 | |||
| archiveurl = | |||
| archivedate = | |||
| quote = Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a “direct financial interest in the outcome” of his inquiry. | |||
}}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref> | |||
], the editor in chief of '']'', resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and ]) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup,<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> with Channel 4 News saying "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog, run by climate sceptic Andrew Montford, will come as an embarrassment to the enquiry's chair Sir Muir Russell". <ref name="Channel 4 News">{{cite news|url=http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/science_technology/aposclimategateapos+review+member+resigns/3536642|title='Climate-gate' review member resigns|last=Clarke|first=Tom|date=11 February 2010|publisher=Channel 4 News|language=English|accessdate=3 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 12:35, 15 September 2010
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.