Misplaced Pages

Allegations of apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:29, 8 February 2006 editSWalter (talk | contribs)8 edits See talk← Previous edit Revision as of 20:32, 8 February 2006 edit undoPinchasC (talk | contribs)8,782 editsm This is more appropiate than what you have see the entire talk page with many editors sharing the same viewNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ]
{{mergeto|Racial discrimination}}
{{merge|List of political epithets#Apartheid}}
{{merge|Racial segregation}}
{{cleanup-date|November 2005}}
Controversially, arguments are sometimes made that the past or present actions of other nations are analogous to ], or constitute apartheid under the definition adopted in ]. The following are examples of use of the word ''Apartheid'' as an ] used rhetorically for polemic effect, in reference to the original racial discrimination laws properly called "Apartheid", formerly used in ] and ]. <!-- Adding explanation of the scope of this article. It appears to not set out to actually cite actual instances of racial discrimation laws. where is apartheid defined in international law? -->



==See also==
*]
*]
*]

Revision as of 20:32, 8 February 2006

Redirect to:

Allegations of apartheid: Difference between revisions Add topic