Misplaced Pages

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

/* Reproductive Health Bill (Philippines) */

I agree with Uncle G. This is the equivalent of the American Health care bills. There are 3 bill with their own articles. If this bill on the Philippine RH bill is deleted, I will suspect systemic bias. Let's remove the deletion tag, please. Klughilton4 (talk) 08:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

GOCE newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! Participation report — We have 71 participants in the September drive. 95 people signed up for the July drive, and in May we had 36. Progress report — We have been making solid progress in eliminating the 2008 articles from the backlog so far. If we continue to focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Overall volumes are lower than expected though, with nearly a thousand articles yet to be done if we are to meet our overall target. If you have not yet participated in the drive, we recommend you do so. If each person who signed up edits one article per day from now till the end of the month we can eliminate another 1,065 articles from the backlog. All contributions are appreciated. Announcement: credit for 10k+ articles — Participants editing a 10k word article may claim credit for two 5k+ articles on the leaderboard. Those that edit a 15k word article may claim credit for three. Regardless, the article is still counted as a single article in the tallies. Reminder — Articles from the Requests page can be included in your tally, even if they do not have a copy edit tag. This is a great place to go if you are interested in finding a higher quality article to work on. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa , S Masters (talk),  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK, and The Raptor .

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Guild of Copy Editors at 15:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC).

TUSC token 087696064cb31a03fb387e7314360e42

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Here you go

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I noticed you haven't received any awards yet. Well, here's your first of hopefully many. The Utahraptor 01:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Access Denied 01:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem. You definitely deserve it. The Utahraptor 01:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Um...

Care to explain this? I'm sure it was an accident. The Utahraptor 02:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I must have accidentally clicked rollback. Access Denied 02:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

That's alright, I've done the same thing. No hard feelings. :) The Utahraptor 02:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick vandal-fighting

Our article on Mary Wollstonecraft has only recently come out of page protection. Apparently it is attracting vandalism again. Thank you for spotting and quickly reverting this. Could you keep this article on your watch list? There may well be more similar childish attacks. BrainyBabe (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit requests

Hi AccessDenied - I saw that you left a request for copyediting on Malleus Fatuorum's page for One Step Closer and just wanted to leave you a note. Usually, "expert copyedits" are the last step in the process. At this point, the article has absolutely no references - this should be the first step in the process, as the article won't make it to either B or GA class without these. The prose doesn't need to be expert for these steps. Also, a lot of times, as references are added, the prose changed significantly due to nuances and additional information given by the sources. I would suggest taking a look at some of the other songs that are already of GA class (or FA class) and checking out their referencing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Note

I have nominated User:Access Denied/vandalbox for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Access Denied/vandalbox. Cunard (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

CSD G1

yeah, that was the simplest explanation of G1 I could think of. and will do later.--intelati 03:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your sig

Please change it. Especially the size of the red border. Thanks. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I already did. Access Denied 04:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback 2

I replied to your report for "Thecakeisaliethecakeisalie". Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

On a side note, where is that lovely user stamp of your's (the one that is big, red, and says "Access Denied")? I could have so many uses for that IRL, if you didn't mind. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean this? Access Denied 04:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you! You don't mind if I use it in real life some, do you? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 04:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't mind, but Forty two (talk · contribs) created it, so you should probably ask them. Access Denied 04:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

That one....

G3 not a G10 :) Although what you did was a good idea. Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback 3

Names

Notice the complainers name. Thats you clue. :D--intelati 04:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

He's from California. That's another clue. :) I have to say I did a double-take the first time I saw "Access Denied" in bold red letters, and it took me about 2 seconds to realize it was just a funny username. The user Andy Gump, er, Grump (and his dynamic IP's) was probably just annoyed at being slapped for his meataxe approach to an article, and he had to look for something to grump about. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 08:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

LGBT Adoption - Florida

Hi there - you reverted my edits to the LGBT Adoption page relating to the State of Florida. I'm assuming good faith and thinking that you haven't heard news of the recent court ruling and executive decision by Governor Crist. LGBT Adoption is now legal in Florida. Please see: http://articles.cnn.com/2010-09-22/us/florida.gay.adoptions_1_adoption-law-martin-gill-adoption-services?_s=PM:US

I do recognize that that piece needs citations, and I will add those tomorrow. I didn't want to leave the inaccurate information out there, however. Additionally, I removed the link to the map of North America as it continues not only inaccurate data on Florida, but also Arkansas - where a ban on gay adoption was struck down back in April.

Thanks 66.229.211.131 (talk) 06:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Your use of rollback

Your use of rollback at User talk:Neutralhomer was inappropriate. Jclemens' post was not vandalism, nor was it uncivil, nor was it a personal attack. It was a message left in good faith and you should not have rolled it back without an edit summary explaining why you were removing the message. I have reverted your rollback - feel free to remove it if you really insist, but please do not use rollback for it. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 05:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I see you rolled yourself back before my revert got through. Fair enough. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 05:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

That was an accident, and I already self-reverted. I am on my iPod Touch, and I was loading my watchlist, but when I meant to click on Inka 888's talk page, it zoomed out all of a sudden and my finger ended up on top of the rollback button before I knew. sorry about that. Access Denied 05:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Don't worry access, you're not the only one who's made a rollback blunder; I once misclicked and rolled back AIV... GiftigerWunsch 22:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Noted; no worries. :) Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 02:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Nagadasaka

Hi, I've removed your db tag from Nagadasaka. Being a king is a claim of notability. You could use AfD, if you still think this should be deleted. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is about to begin!

Get ready. The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is about to begin. Prep your keyboards, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please get your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar ". Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Mono (talk · contribs) and WikiCopter (talk · contribs)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 05:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC).

Misplaced Pages:Userboxes

Beat you by an entire minute. :D--Talktome 01:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

:( Access Denied  01:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

"FATAL ERROR" :)--Talktome 01:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!

Get going. The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please start wikifying, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please invite your friends to join up as well (anyone can join, even after the drive has begun). In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar code. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! All the instructions are on the drive page, so please begin logging your scores. Regards, Mono (talk · contribs) and WikiCopter (talk · contribs)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive at 03:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC).

Query: Are you able to watch the numbers of the participants, update the progress board and Gold Star Leaderboard? Both me and Mono seem to have been wikibonked for a while. WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • shot down) 05:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I'll try, but I probably will only be able to update it every few days, because my life is getting busier due to school. Access Denied  05:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: You messed my userboxes when you edited my user page. --Inka 04:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

American vs. English English

Regarding thing like what happened on User:HJMitchell, is there a way to figure out whether things like that are simply different dialects of English, or typos? Or do I have to just guess? Thanks! Flightx52 (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

That's a tough question to answer. One thing, though, that you should never do is change between English variants on somebody else's userpage. Cheers, Access Denied  22:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) A list of most variants can be found at WP:Manual of Style (spelling). The Utahraptor/_{Contributions} 22:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Access Denied  22:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Us talk page stalkers are always here for you. :) The Utahraptor/_{Contributions} 23:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

My talk page

If I have something on my talk page such as "do not edit above here" there's probably a good reason for it. I moved your template to under "new editing restriction" and blanked the original content just as cleanup. --Inka 03:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Did you keep the DoNotArchiveUntil? Access Denied  03:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

 Done--Talktome 03:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Does that keep my auto archiving setup from archiving it? --Inka 03:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it will not be archived until the specified date. Access Denied  03:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated! Several of our top editors were called away to real life concerns during the month (be careful out there, people!). This meant that once again, we did not meet all our lofty targets, but we did come close. Stats Out of 76 registered editors, 45 actively participated. We nearly wiped out the 2008 articles from the backlog—there were only 13 remaining when the drive closed. We reduced the backlog by 725 articles (11.5%), so it was another successful drive. A total of 59 barnstars will be awarded to 40 editors—well done, and congratulations to all. Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the July 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, you may have earned rollover words, which counted towards this month's barnstars (except for the leaderboard awards). Any unused word credits will be held over for the next drive, as long as you participated in the September drive. Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. Click here to see a list of barnstar winners. We will be holding our next drive in November. You can sign up here. A huge "thank you" to all editors who helped clear the backlog and to others who helped out behind-the-scenes. See you at the next drive, and until then, please continue to help us work through the backlog. Happy editing! Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Co-coordinators: Diannaa and S Masters (talk). Newsletter by Diannaa and The Utahraptor/Contributions.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 07:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC).

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page! Wayne Olajuwon chat 16:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem! Access Denied  16:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Num nums!

Hey there! Nice job reverting vandalism - have a cookie!

Addihockey10 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--Addihockey10 16:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Yum! Access Denied  16:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Roman Catholic population of Ecuador

Today less than 65% of the Ecuadorians are Roman Catholic. The information of the Cia Fact Book is old and has to be updated. 50 years ago Ecuador had 95% of Roman Catholic population. The reality has changed dramatically.--122.161.160.91 (talk) 17:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to let you add that back in if you cited a verifiable reliable source. Access Denied  17:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

This source cites the latest (2006)figures by diocese according to the Catholic church. The first three dioceses I checked were all still running well above 85%, Babahoyobut was 73%. All had indeed shown a fall in the last five (not fifty) years. The IP could add all the data up in a spreadsheet and source it to this source if he wanted (adding up isn't OR), but he's probably right that it is now below 95%. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:DENY

Just to let you know, you should be careful about adding diffs like to your user page as it's generally recommended to avoid feeding the trolls, and the comment in question was a particularly malicious personal attack / BLP violation and we should avoid bringing any further attention to it. Note that the revision has now been deleted as it was grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material and also purely disruptive. GiftigerWunsch 18:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I'll try to keep the links to simple blatant vandalism and stupidity in the future. Access Denied  23:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

bye tWikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page jbvbjn]] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe theuet edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summaruety. You may also wish to read jb urjintroduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Access Denied  16:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Lol troll edit above, I'm gonna keep this here. Access Denied  16:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

A quick thought...

...Hi again, I interacted with you at WP:AN. Just wanted to say that I think the ban is a good idea. I don't think being biased against all IPs is. But on a more important note, after reviewing the vandal's activities thus far, the person/group appears to have no intention on stopping. His/her writing implies that s/he is educated and dedicated (s/he corrects his/her grammar at times). This shows me that this person will be a real pain for a while. Good luck on fighting a troll. P.S. My phone won't let me log on. I have an outdated browser or something. Once I get home, I'll join the anti-Zarapastroso fight. Best wishes to you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.171.231.17 (talk) 18:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Inka 888

I and Dr.K. (talk · contribs) agree that Inka 888 is ready for the rollback permission. I will contact several people and feel free to discuss on my talk page.--Talktome 20:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

You have a fan...

The Thing // Talk // Contribs 02:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I was just about to show that to you myself. =) Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 02:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Read over Misplaced Pages:Vandalism before you call stuff vandalism that clearly is not. CTJF83 chat 20:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Bass battle

Post a vid on Wiki on you playing Give it all by Rise Against! on my talk page. I will do the same. Bring it. By next week. Ian 01:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Really, I can do it by ear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian.bjorn (talk • contribs)

Please see WP:NOTMYSPACE; Misplaced Pages is not a social network. Access Denied  01:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

ALRIGHT. I'm sorry. but maybe Wiki email? Ian 04:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian.bjorn (talk • contribs)

Please don't spam my inbox. How many times do i have to direct you to WP:MYSPACE? Access Denied  04:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't planning on it. At least real life email me. ian.bjorn@yahoo.com Ian 04:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

You deserve this

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Don't think your Huggle work went unnoticed tonight. The Utahraptor/Contributions 02:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, much appreciated! Access Denied  02:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)