| Revision as of 10:45, 7 October 2010 editRoger Davies (talk | contribs)Administrators34,587 edits →Main account: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:48, 7 October 2010 edit undoEnglishAristocraticFool (talk | contribs)45 edits →Main account: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| All you have to do is nominate an account and stick to it. Your rapid-changing of accounts is disruptive, unnecessary and simply creating drama. ] <sup>]</sup> 10:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | All you have to do is nominate an account and stick to it. Your rapid-changing of accounts is disruptive, unnecessary and simply creating drama. ] <sup>]</sup> 10:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :For your imformation I have done that and when my main account is unblocked I will continue editing happily. Can you please stop hatting threads that criticise you proposed decisions. It is starting to look very very biased to the neutral observer. ] (]) 10:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:48, 7 October 2010
This account is now inactive. It was created by me to see what it was like editing with a new account. This is because it has been nearly a year since I first started editing. I made it a bit jokey but all of the edits were serious. I found it difficult dealing with manual tagging and notifying users when I tried new page patrolling, I had forgotten that you need to be autoconfirmed to use twinkle. Polargeo (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Main account
All you have to do is nominate an account and stick to it. Your rapid-changing of accounts is disruptive, unnecessary and simply creating drama. Roger Davies 10:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- For your imformation I have done that and when my main account is unblocked I will continue editing happily. Can you please stop hatting threads that criticise you proposed decisions. It is starting to look very very biased to the neutral observer. EnglishAristocraticFool (talk) 10:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)