Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feliks Koneczny: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:55, 13 December 2005 editDelirium (talk | contribs)Administrators51,622 editsm moved Talk:Koneczny to Talk:Feliks Koneczny← Previous edit Revision as of 19:50, 11 February 2006 edit undo66.73.195.82 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


The works of Feliks Koneczny are one of the main sources of the polish antisemitic and neo-nazi movements. The works of Feliks Koneczny are one of the main sources of the polish antisemitic and neo-nazi movements.


The above statement is blantant slander of this great Polish historian's good name. Koneczny approached various matters in a critical manner, but he combatted the racist myths of the early 20th century and constantly wrote on the need for morality in politics. He is a guru for the Polish national conservative movement, but for neo-nazis Koneczny's views are reactionary.

Pawel P. Styrna (pawpolusa@yahoo.com)

Revision as of 19:50, 11 February 2006

I suggest to change the article title from "Koneczny" to "Feliks Koneczny", according to the wikipedia custom.

controversy

The works of Feliks Koneczny are one of the main sources of the polish antisemitic and neo-nazi movements.


The above statement is blantant slander of this great Polish historian's good name. Koneczny approached various matters in a critical manner, but he combatted the racist myths of the early 20th century and constantly wrote on the need for morality in politics. He is a guru for the Polish national conservative movement, but for neo-nazis Koneczny's views are reactionary.

Pawel P. Styrna (pawpolusa@yahoo.com)