| Revision as of 15:47, 6 November 2010 editTofutwitch11 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,743 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:51, 7 November 2010 edit undoJasepl (talk | contribs)25,455 edits →KL to XMN: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::: Would you mind continuing the discussion in ], we need a consensus, and it seems Jasepl has backed out. ]-]-] 19:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | ::: Would you mind continuing the discussion in ], we need a consensus, and it seems Jasepl has backed out. ]-]-] 19:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::: ? ]-]-] 15:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | :::: ? ]-]-] 15:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == KL to XMN == | |||
| Sure - I'll take a look at it. Could you also take a look at the article? One of our more prolific IPs keeps adding PrivatAir's technical stop to the destinations table. Tech stops, as you know, aren't destinations and do not get listed per longstanding consensus and WP guidelines. Now some other editor, who seems to know it all, insists on re-instating the IP's entry for no reason. Thanks, ] (]) 06:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:51, 7 November 2010
BA to SJU
I put San Juan and Gatwick up for page protection, they were previously protected because of those IP's, and I put them up again as they are back at it. Dont break 3RR though, it may/may not appear to be vandalism to an ADMIN.(See WP:RFPP for the status Tofutwitch11 18:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is actually begins, what happened ten years ago does not qualify for "resumes", many routes that are "new" have operated in the past, I put the pages up for protection. Tofutwitch11 18:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- They were successfully protected, no more IP's. For now. Tofutwitch11 23:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Would you mind continuing the discussion in WP:AIRPORTS, we need a consensus, and it seems Jasepl has backed out. Tofutwitch11-Chat -How'd I do? 19:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
KL to XMN
Sure - I'll take a look at it. Could you also take a look at the Tbilisi Airport article? One of our more prolific IPs keeps adding PrivatAir's technical stop to the destinations table. Tech stops, as you know, aren't destinations and do not get listed per longstanding consensus and WP guidelines. Now some other editor, who seems to know it all, insists on re-instating the IP's entry for no reason. Thanks, jasepl (talk) 06:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)