Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jplarkin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:14, 15 November 2010 view sourceBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators112,441 edits Banned means "banned", TAWT: no← Previous edit Revision as of 04:57, 24 November 2010 view source Jplarkin (talk | contribs)1,294 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I am a constructive editor and wish to be unblocked. I have vandalised in the past yes, but that was over seven months ago. I cannot remember my first account.|decline=You will need to email ArbCom directly as detailed ]. ] (]) 23:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=I am a constructive editor and wish to be unblocked. I have vandalised in the past yes, but that was over seven months ago. I cannot remember my first account.|decline=You will need to email ArbCom directly as detailed ]. ] (]) 23:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's ] and the early 2009 work of ], how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago ]. The strain we exerted on ] was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain ]. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554.}}

Revision as of 04:57, 24 November 2010

Banned means "banned", TAWT

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jplarkin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

TAWT was a long time ago. At that time, I tried to say I was sorry and asked how I could make amends with the people I had offended, but I couldn't get a straight answer from anyone. I have been editing constructively from this account for seven months, and have set up articles which remain today because of their notability. Hopefully we can all be adult about this and acknowledge that I was being very childish back then, but am now a credit to the project and I deserve a second chance, based on the fact that, for the past seven months, I have worked only to better the encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

Then for seven months you have continued to ignore Misplaced Pages policy. This (as you admit) is a sock account and will therefore not be unblocked. I suggest you go back to your home account and ask for an unblock there, also you should disclose ALL the alternative accounts that you have ever used.  Ronhjones  22:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit-conflicted decline: Not a long time ago. User:The abominable Wiki troll edited as late as February 2010. You must make any unban requests with the account under which you were banned. See WP:BASC.  Sandstein  22:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is quite a while. No vandalism for months, showing that I have changed my ways. How on earth can I make an unblock request from the abominable wiki troll when the talk page is banned? I'm pretty baffled as to why Misplaced Pages mods would be so keen to block someone who only wants to help the project. Jplarkin (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jplarkin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a constructive editor and wish to be unblocked. I have vandalised in the past yes, but that was over seven months ago. I cannot remember my first account.

Decline reason:

You will need to email ArbCom directly as detailed here. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jplarkin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's User:PhilOak and the early 2009 work of User:RabAllan, how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/RabAllan. The strain we exerted on User:JD554 was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain User talk:Susan lee54. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's ] and the early 2009 work of ], how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago ]. The strain we exerted on ] was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain ]. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's ] and the early 2009 work of ], how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago ]. The strain we exerted on ] was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain ]. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's ] and the early 2009 work of ], how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago ]. The strain we exerted on ] was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain ]. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: