| Revision as of 17:02, 23 February 2009 view sourceVanished user 05 (talk | contribs)6,607 editsm →Style← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:31, 25 November 2010 view source Avraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,160 editsm Protected User talk:Vanished user 05: No reason for a vanished user to have edits to their user or talk pages. ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (147 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| See old threads: ]. | |||
| Other pages: ], ] | |||
| == Web brigades....again == | |||
| I think you may want to look at ]. The ] has again reinserted all that information which is not relevant to this Russian conspiracy theory, and now ] is ] by claiming consensus and reinserting said info again. What do you think? Is it about time this piece of rubbish article is taken to AfD, and have this thrashed out for once and for all, because the entire thing is based upon the views of a single nutcase reporter. Anyway, your views on this are welcome on the article talk page, as it seems this is going to happen every other month when the owner of the article decides to re-include everything again. --] <sup>]</sup> 01:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Heroes == | |||
| Hey Ellol, thanks for bluelinking some of those redlinks. I got a phone call today with some unexpected news; a friend calls me telling me to pack my bags, he managed to get us some cheap-arsed tickets to ] (Краби), and left it until today to tell me. We leave tomorrow for a week's R&R in glorious Thailand, so I won't be around (obviously). With the hero's list, I will leave ] there if you need to make any changes and the like. Catch you in a week, I'll buzz ya when I return. Cheers, --] <sup>]</sup> 05:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Have a nice vacation! :-) ] (]) 17:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You contacted me about having removed a quotation by ]. In case you did not notice my comment on the edit, I wrote: "Removed quoted rebuttal as ]." In other words, I was concerned that by giving a name, title, and verbatim quote to a government spokesman (Aliyev), we were straying (unintentionally, I am sure) from a neutral point of view. | |||
| You stated that Timur Aliyev is "an important source" and "a notable person." Aliyev's notability is not at issue here, as this article is not about him. Because he was speaking as a representative of President Kadyrov, and not on his own authority, I consider it unnecessary to identify him more specifically — much less to specify that he was speaking "by telephone from Grozny." That kind of detail is appropriate to a news story or blog post, but not to an encyclopedia article. | |||
| I am concerned that you accused me of "inappropriate behaviour." I acted in good faith, and it would be unkind of you to assume otherwise without cause. | |||
| I hope I have addressed your concerns about this article. If not, I will be glad to discuss this further at ]. — ] ''alias'' ] 22:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Please stick to the subject == | |||
| Eloll, with all my respect, please do not turn "Putinism" into a discussion forum on Russia's current social developments. Polls about what Russians think about Medvedev may well belong to ]. "Putinism" dwells on the idiosyncracies of ''Putin'' 's regime of power and this whole section ("Nominal transfer") is relevant as far as there's a dominant ''experts'' ' school of thought claiming that he remains top man on the totem pole. When this stops being the case, that ''will'' signal the end of Putinism (and consequently the end of the subject), the procession towards which is dealt with in the "Prognosis and aftermath". Also, Mikheyev's opinion is irrelevant anyways as he is nobody and the source is self-publishing tabloid site of a marginal grouping.] (]) 12:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Thought you might be interested == | |||
| . It's funny, I think I might dub this guy ''Litvinenko'', for he too has history of making accusations against others but presenting no evidence to back them up. Just as funny is Biophys' question, I am sure he has more than enough editors to stalk and harrass, without actively looking for more. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 12:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *My name is not Litvinenko. Also, i just pointed out certain ''facts'', if you will take the trouble of seeing all the relevant links, the fact being some users in RuWP being out of admins' jurisdiction: they are allowed to commit violations with impunity; moreover, if i complain about them, i het blocked - this is a simple, plain fact that has to be expalined.] (]) 17:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| **Whatever the problem, it should be discussed with admins of the RuWiki, shouldn't it? And whatever is your problem with the RuWiki admins, it doesn't give you any preferences while communicating and editing in the English Wiki. ] (]) 17:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Style == | |||
| Ellol, please do not use contractions such as "it's" (this is not the kind of style that is appropriate in writing), especially in cases where "it was" is actually called for (if you do not quite get what i mean, read sth on what they call in Russian Согласование времен в английском).] (]) 17:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Again (apropos ), sorry but the fact is that your knowledge of English is less than sufficient for literary use. Please, if you are not sure, do not make such corrections: the expression "he went on to say" is not at all the same as "to go on doing sth".] (]) 16:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for help. ] (]) 17:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | |||