Misplaced Pages

User talk:Samofi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:55, 29 December 2010 editIaaasi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,462 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 07:58, 29 December 2010 edit undoIaaasi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,462 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
* User:Tobar888 * User:Tobar888
:Will you confirm / deny those and can you list any other names that you used back in the past. ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC) :Will you confirm / deny those and can you list any other names that you used back in the past. ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
::I think Samofi was honest when he rejected the sockpuppetry accusations. For example the account ] was mine... (] (]) 07:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)) ::I think Samofi was honest when he rejected the sockpuppetry accusations. For example the accounts ] and ] were mine... (] (]) 07:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC))

Revision as of 07:58, 29 December 2010

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In article Cernova tragedy I removed source which I did not understand - Magyar, and I keept and added english sources. Hungarian source was from magazine and written by "manager", its not scholar http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources. I did not make disruptive editing. I was bullying by Hubartimus without reasons and with Stubs99 who attacked my personal page. I agree that I made personal attack in SELF-DEFENCE and hope that this ban will short. I understand my mistake, that I have used emotion, but after provocations. --Samofi (talk) 9:03 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but your unblock request does not indicate that you understand why you have been blocked. Please write a new unblock request that discusses your behavior (not the behavior of other editors), what you did that led to a block, and how your behavior will change to avoid future disruption. TNXMan 15:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As noted at ANI, the combination of large aggressive editing with a clear POV indicates a battleground mentality that's inappropriate here. The fact that your response pointing to edits at Černová tragedy which were immediately reverted (in part, because you are obviously removing sources you don't agree with) indicates a real need to understand that purposes of Misplaced Pages is not for you to push your POV on everybody else. You can't even respond to a single point without making it an argument about authors along ethnic lines. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I declared that IP: 78.128.181.9 its my IP in the deletion talk page of deleted article Problems of Slovak nationality in Hungarian Kingdom (sometimes I forget to log in) and user: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga its not me. So this page is POV of User:Baxter9: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga I appeal to admins to put out my tag "
This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that he or she has abusively used one or more accounts. (Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed socks)
" because it unfair.

Decline reason:

Please don't use this template to request edits; it is only for unblocking requests. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to appeal to admins to put out my tag "
This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that he or she has abusively used one or more accounts. (Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed socks)
" because it unfair. I declared that IP: 78.128.181.9 its my IP in the deletion talk page of deleted article Problems of Slovak nationality in Hungarian Kingdom (sometimes I forget to log in) and user: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga its not me. So this page is POV of User:Baxter9: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga Thank you for answer. --Samofi (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the fundamental rules of Misplaced Pages. Now I know that I made a lot of disruptions - personal attacks, POV, I was not neutral, I had bad citations. I think I can work more accurately so I would like to have a chance to continue with editing. Firstly I would like to finish my article about the Slovaks in Hungary. I will firstly discuss controversial issues than I will make bigger changes in articles. I will not make edit wars and I will contact administrator when it will be some problem. About my sock puppets I know nothing, I use internet from the router in my campus, so a lot of people can use it. I admit that sometimes I was not log in and I was editing under my IP and not my nick. So I would like to unblock my IP: User:78.128.181.9 and to perform better investigation of my sock puppets. Thank you for possible unblock. Yours truly Samofi.

Decline reason:

From all I've read below, no, it seems like WP:BATTLEFIELD was written with you in mind. --jpgordon 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I undestand my ban. I agree that I was guilty. I have not used sock puppets for a significant time. In the past I was offensive, I have not read Misplaced Pages´s fundamental rules. But I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English. I understand that Misplaced Pages is not battlefield and it can exists more opinions. I would like to contribute to less controversial topics and more discuss about my edits. I think I had a enough time to understand my faults to not make it again. I would like to have a chance to edit Misplaced Pages again

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I undestand my ban. I agree that I was guilty. I have not used sock puppets for a significant time. In the past I was offensive, I have not read Misplaced Pages´s fundamental rules. But I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English. I understand that Misplaced Pages is not battlefield and it can exists more opinions. I would like to contribute to less controversial topics and more discuss about my edits. I think I had a enough time to understand my faults to not make it again. I would like to have a chance to edit Misplaced Pages again |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I undestand my ban. I agree that I was guilty. I have not used sock puppets for a significant time. In the past I was offensive, I have not read Misplaced Pages´s fundamental rules. But I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English. I understand that Misplaced Pages is not battlefield and it can exists more opinions. I would like to contribute to less controversial topics and more discuss about my edits. I think I had a enough time to understand my faults to not make it again. I would like to have a chance to edit Misplaced Pages again |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I undestand my ban. I agree that I was guilty. I have not used sock puppets for a significant time. In the past I was offensive, I have not read Misplaced Pages´s fundamental rules. But I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English. I understand that Misplaced Pages is not battlefield and it can exists more opinions. I would like to contribute to less controversial topics and more discuss about my edits. I think I had a enough time to understand my faults to not make it again. I would like to have a chance to edit Misplaced Pages again |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
You are only allowed one account. It is thought that you have used (at least)
  • User:MartinMagera
  • User:Tobar888
Will you confirm / deny those and can you list any other names that you used back in the past.  Ronhjones  22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
I think Samofi was honest when he rejected the sockpuppetry accusations. For example the accounts User:MartinMagera and User:JanVarga were mine... (Iaaasi (talk) 07:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC))
Categories: