| Revision as of 02:08, 22 February 2006 editOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators260,845 edits →[]: warn level 4 for deleting large blocks from talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:50, 22 February 2006 edit undoPschemp (talk | contribs)Administrators20,808 edits calrification requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ==Deleting material on the talk page== | ==Deleting material on the talk page== | ||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 02:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> <b><font face="Arial" color="#D47C14">]</font><font color="#7D4C0C">]</font>]</b> 02:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Dispute tag== | |||
| Pleasy clarify you reasons for placing this tag. Here is the list of reasons why the tag should be used: | |||
| The accuracy of an article may be a cause for concern if: | |||
| * it contains a lot of unlikely information, without providing references. | |||
| * it contains information which is particularly difficult to verify. | |||
| * in, for example, a long list, some errors have been found, suggesting that the list as a whole may need further checking. | |||
| * it has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic. | |||
| So far, I have not seen that any of these are occuring in this article, but welcome your comments. <small>]]] | ]</small> 04:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:50, 22 February 2006
Hello, I'm ]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks! Jasmol 03:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Raelus 05:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Big Spring, Texas; please refer to Misplaced Pages's policy on neutral point of view. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie 04:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Please refer to Misplaced Pages's 3-revert-rule as well as it's policies on neutral-point-of-view. OhNoitsJamie 17:58, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
3RR on Big Spring, Texas
I have blocked you for 8 hours for WP:3RR on Big Spring, Texas. William M. Connolley 19:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC).
Big Spring, Texas
The "positives" section of the text you are continually tryng to insert into the article is not any more encyclopedic than the negative part. Please participate in the discussion page and cooperate on a concenus version of the text. Kuru 03:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Kuru 03:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Evil saltine 05:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Big Spring, Texas, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Evil saltine 05:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Deceptive edit summaries
Regarding this edit and edit summary: ; Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. OhNoitsJamie 17:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Edit summary
When editing an article on Misplaced Pages there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
~ ApolloCreed 23:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Deleting material on the talk page
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. OhNoitsJamie 02:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Dispute tag
Pleasy clarify you reasons for placing this tag. Here is the list of reasons why the tag should be used: The accuracy of an article may be a cause for concern if:
- it contains a lot of unlikely information, without providing references.
- it contains information which is particularly difficult to verify.
- in, for example, a long list, some errors have been found, suggesting that the list as a whole may need further checking.
- it has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic.
So far, I have not seen that any of these are occuring in this article, but welcome your comments. pschemp | talk 04:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)