Misplaced Pages

User talk:Happyjoe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:59, 22 February 2006 editHappyjoe (talk | contribs)66 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:25, 22 February 2006 edit undoPschemp (talk | contribs)Administrators20,808 edits signNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sockpuppet|Ohnoitsjayme|evidence=}}
==Dispute tag==
Pleasy clarify you reasons for placing this tag. Here is the list of reasons why the tag should be used:
The accuracy of an article may be a cause for concern if:
* it contains a lot of unlikely information, without providing references.
* it contains information which is particularly difficult to verify.
* in, for example, a long list, some errors have been found, suggesting that the list as a whole may need further checking.
* it has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic.

So far, I have not seen that any of these are occuring in this article, but welcome your comments.<small>]]] | ]</small> 22:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:25, 22 February 2006

Multi-user iconAn editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ohnoitsjayme (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to for evidence.
Account information: block logcontribslogsabuse logCentralAuth

Dispute tag

Pleasy clarify you reasons for placing this tag. Here is the list of reasons why the tag should be used: The accuracy of an article may be a cause for concern if:

  • it contains a lot of unlikely information, without providing references.
  • it contains information which is particularly difficult to verify.
  • in, for example, a long list, some errors have been found, suggesting that the list as a whole may need further checking.
  • it has been written (or edited) by a user who is known to write inaccurately on the topic.

So far, I have not seen that any of these are occuring in this article, but welcome your comments.pschemp | talk 22:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Category: