| Revision as of 14:54, 16 January 2011 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Apparent 1RR violation at Israeli settlement: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:41, 16 January 2011 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Edit warring at Israeli settlement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| Hello Noisetier. Please see ]. You seem to have made two reverts in 24 hours, by re-adding the term 'Jewish settlement' to the lead sentence twice (at 07:45 and 13:28 on 16 January). You may respond at the noticeboard if you wish. Thank you, ] (]) 14:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | Hello Noisetier. Please see ]. You seem to have made two reverts in 24 hours, by re-adding the term 'Jewish settlement' to the lead sentence twice (at 07:45 and 13:28 on 16 January). You may respond at the noticeboard if you wish. Thank you, ] (]) 14:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit warring at ] == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> The complete report of this case is at ]. | |||
| <hr> | |||
| ] The ] has permitted ] to impose, at their own discretion, ] on any editor working on pages broadly related to the ] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at ]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> ] (]) 17:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:41, 16 January 2011
- Messages are not often read - it may require some time before they get an answer - Don't hesitate to post them directly on my talk page on wp:fr.
- Archives : 1
Todros Geller
Unfortunately there are no biographies of Todros Geller written by scholars yet. I wish there were. That article is proving very difficult to write so any help would be appreciated. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- I guess Irving Cutler book, already used as a source in the article might provide secondary reflection. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- first one sources what interests you. If you remove around the palette, you will find even more info that man. Noisetier (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Apparent 1RR violation at Israeli settlement
Hello Noisetier. Please see WP:AN3#User:Noisetier reported by User:Supreme Deliciousness (Result: ). You seem to have made two reverts in 24 hours, by re-adding the term 'Jewish settlement' to the lead sentence twice (at 07:45 and 13:28 on 16 January). You may respond at the noticeboard if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring at Israeli settlement
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Noisetier reported by User:Supreme Deliciousness (Result: 48h).
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. EdJohnston (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)