Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kenilworth Terrace/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Kenilworth Terrace Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:43, 9 January 2011 editKenilworth Terrace (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,715 edits I will put it up for AFD in due course← Previous edit Revision as of 19:38, 21 January 2011 edit undoCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits Wack Pack: COI concernsNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. ] (]) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC) I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. ] (]) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
:I will put it up for AFD in due course. ] (]) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC) :I will put it up for AFD in due course. ] (]) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

==COI concerns==
Simply put after relentless questioning, including repeating same question over and over again, to the point of harassment, I decided to try to figure out your POV through your list of contributions. If I'd seen your edits were all very pro-Israel, I'd have one viewpoint. If I saw they were all anti-Irish, I'd have another. But when I went to your contributions page, low and behold most of your articles are related to S&M, including involving women. Just looking at a few pages, it's not like your POV is "these are disgusting."

So I have to wonder if you are ''financially benefiting yourself by engaging in a little written free sadism against a female'', something which you'd have to pay quite a bit of money per hour for, even if you just did it online with someone who specializes in that kind of sex work. So I've brought it up here per WP:COI policy. ] (]) 19:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:38, 21 January 2011


Archives

I


Wack Pack

I disagree with the redirect and have reverted the article to the version previous to the redirect. If you want to delete the article, I'd ask you please put it up on afd. I'd be happy to discuss it further when you resume editing. Thanks. CarbonX (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

I will put it up for AFD in due course. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

COI concerns

Simply put after relentless questioning, including repeating same question over and over again, to the point of harassment, I decided to try to figure out your POV through your list of contributions. If I'd seen your edits were all very pro-Israel, I'd have one viewpoint. If I saw they were all anti-Irish, I'd have another. But when I went to your contributions page, low and behold most of your articles are related to S&M, including involving women. Just looking at a few pages, it's not like your POV is "these are disgusting."

So I have to wonder if you are financially benefiting yourself by engaging in a little written free sadism against a female, something which you'd have to pay quite a bit of money per hour for, even if you just did it online with someone who specializes in that kind of sex work. So I've brought it up here per WP:COI policy. CarolMooreDC (talk) 19:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)