| Revision as of 09:18, 31 January 2011 editScott MacDonald (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,363 edits →Deletion of Internet Movie Cars Database: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:03, 1 February 2011 edit undoResidentAnthropologist (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers7,071 edits →Cirt: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| I know it's a little late to ask this question, but why did you delete the Internet Movie Cars Database article? The references were a little bit old, but most new articles don't have a lot of good sources. I think it would have been better to give the article some more time to develop. But then again, you're a more experienced user than me. —] (]) 05:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | I know it's a little late to ask this question, but why did you delete the Internet Movie Cars Database article? The references were a little bit old, but most new articles don't have a lot of good sources. I think it would have been better to give the article some more time to develop. But then again, you're a more experienced user than me. —] (]) 05:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :IT was deleted because the consensus at the debate ] saw it as unsuitable.--] 09:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | :IT was deleted because the consensus at the debate ] saw it as unsuitable.--] 09:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Cirt == | |||
| Please stop badgering Cirt on her talk page. I don't disagree with your position nor with your concerns and understand the background of the matter as better than most. Talking to Cirt is a very frustrating task even for the simplest questions. I advise you too drop it for now. Gripe on WR if you feels its appropriate but the more of thats done the harder it will be to ever get an actions on the issues. We dont need any one playing victim because a cabal of editors are targeting them. ] (]) 03:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:03, 1 February 2011
See my archives here.
Any relationship with the author?
of this book? I have to say the coincidence in names and preoccupations would be hilarious if totally serendipitous... Tijfo098 (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that's my PhD thesis on Misplaced Pages. ;)--Scott Mac 12:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- OMG, you also wrote "Confessions of a Feminist Porn Watcher"? jstor (famous why) (UC Press full text, not sure if the link will work for you though) Tijfo098 (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Every Wikipedian should write at least three books like that. Indeed, no one who hasn't should be an admin.--Scott Mac 12:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- OMG, you also wrote "Confessions of a Feminist Porn Watcher"? jstor (famous why) (UC Press full text, not sure if the link will work for you though) Tijfo098 (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of Internet Movie Cars Database
I know it's a little late to ask this question, but why did you delete the Internet Movie Cars Database article? The references were a little bit old, but most new articles don't have a lot of good sources. I think it would have been better to give the article some more time to develop. But then again, you're a more experienced user than me. —Reelcheeper (talk) 05:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- IT was deleted because the consensus at the debate Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Internet Movie Cars Database saw it as unsuitable.--Scott Mac 09:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Cirt
Please stop badgering Cirt on her talk page. I don't disagree with your position nor with your concerns and understand the background of the matter as better than most. Talking to Cirt is a very frustrating task even for the simplest questions. I advise you too drop it for now. Gripe on WR if you feels its appropriate but the more of thats done the harder it will be to ever get an actions on the issues. We dont need any one playing victim because a cabal of editors are targeting them. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 03:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)