| Revision as of 13:32, 1 February 2011 editHoward the Duck (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers116,539 edits →Azkals: chiming in← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:47, 1 February 2011 edit undoBanana Fingers (talk | contribs)7,341 edits Undid revision 411371376 by Howard the Duck (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :::The page was originally the article for the football team, but rightly so, it was moved to the right and appropriate title of "Philippines national football team". Then naturally "Azkals" became a redirect to the football team article. The article ] was created about a month or so after "Azkals" was created but the redirect remained towards the football team article. Don't think there was any consensus or anything like that to determine which article "Azkals" redirects to. Again, all I've done was change the redirect to it's more appropriate article; "Azkals" → ]. ] (]) 12:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | :::The page was originally the article for the football team, but rightly so, it was moved to the right and appropriate title of "Philippines national football team". Then naturally "Azkals" became a redirect to the football team article. The article ] was created about a month or so after "Azkals" was created but the redirect remained towards the football team article. Don't think there was any consensus or anything like that to determine which article "Azkals" redirects to. Again, all I've done was change the redirect to it's more appropriate article; "Azkals" → ]. ] (]) 12:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Chiming in, when you refer to "Azkals," it certainly refers to the football team (this is outright obvious when used as a written word; no one refers to the dog as an "azkal"). When used as a spoken word, a harder /z/ sound refers to the football team, while the /s/ sound refers to the dog. | |||
| :See these two ] clips (both are predominantly in Tagalog): | |||
| :* in ] | |||
| :* in ] | |||
| :–''']''' (]) 13:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:PRFU Volcanoes.jpg== | ==Orphaned non-free image File:PRFU Volcanoes.jpg== | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 1 February 2011
Azkals
Hi Banana Fingers - I noticed you are involved in a content dispute at Azkals. Since the content dispute began again basically as soon as protection was removed, I have re-protected the article, so there is a chance to gain consensus on the nickname issue. Single-handedly and repeatedly changing the target of the redirect (or edit-warring in the article) will not lead to the result you want here, and unfortunately you may end up being blocked for edit warring.
It appears that you believe that the nickname "Azkals" should not feature in the article because it is not official or widely used. It does seem, however, that the name is being used in some news sources, and their are references in the article which support this. There has already been a third opinion, which has been in favour of mentioning the name in the article. If you feel strongly about this issue, the way to change the article is via the talk page. Do you think it would be useful to ask editors from WP:FOOTBALL for their thoughts? --Kateshortforbob talk 14:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- "Azkals" redirecting to Askal. I don't see what's wrong with that. It's also more appropriate. Banana Fingers (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- The problem is that there is obviously some disagreement about whether Azkals should redirect to Askal or to the football team article. The page was originally an article about the football team, and has been a redirect to that article since 2006, which indicates, if not consensus, that is hasn't been something that has caused concern until now. It would be simple to add hatnotes to both articles to avoid confusion, but the redirect needs to be stable, one way or another. Protection is forcing stability at the moment, but I would prefer not to do that in the long run. --Kateshortforbob talk 16:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- The page was originally the article for the football team, but rightly so, it was moved to the right and appropriate title of "Philippines national football team". Then naturally "Azkals" became a redirect to the football team article. The article Askal was created about a month or so after "Azkals" was created but the redirect remained towards the football team article. Don't think there was any consensus or anything like that to determine which article "Azkals" redirects to. Again, all I've done was change the redirect to it's more appropriate article; "Azkals" → Askal. Banana Fingers (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PRFU Volcanoes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PRFU Volcanoes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust Contribs 20:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
