Revision as of 11:13, 19 February 2006 editKimchi.sg (talk | contribs)22,857 edits remove my comments since Commander Keane has already said what I wanted to say← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:18, 25 February 2006 edit undoJohantheghost (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,955 edits CommasNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Re: Userboxes == | == Re: Userboxes == | ||
<small>''I had posted something in this section, but it is basically a repeat of what Commander Keane has said in the previous paragraph. So I have removed my comments. You can check the page history if you want to know what I posted. — ] | ] 11:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)''</small> | <small>''I had posted something in this section, but it is basically a repeat of what Commander Keane has said in the previous paragraph. So I have removed my comments. You can check the page history if you want to know what I posted. — ] | ] 11:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)''</small> | ||
== Commas == | |||
Hi, I have restored many of the commas to ]. Please leave them in, as the article is much more readable with them there. For example, this version of the sentence: | |||
:Since opening the canal has been enormously successful and continues to be a key conduit for international shipping. | |||
starts out reading like the sentence: | |||
:Since opening the canal, Paris Hilton has opened many supermarkets. | |||
When the reader gets to "has been...", he/she realises that "since opening the canal" is not actually a cohesive unit, and has to go back and start again. The version with the comma: | |||
:Since opening, the canal has been enormously successful, and continues to be a key conduit for international shipping. | |||
avoids that ambiguity, and hence results in a less awkward read with no false start. Please see the ] article for the many ways in which commas can be used to improve readability by adding appropriate structure to text. BTW, your other changes to that article are helpful and much appreciated. Cheers, — ] ] 13:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:18, 25 February 2006
Categories that are members of themselves?
It certainly isn't desirable! The problem is having the userbox on the category page - the userbox automatically added the category to itself and the loop is created. The solution is to substitute the userbox and then manually delete the category. Alternatively you can just remove the userbox from the category page - I don't think it is vital to have it there.
What is subst'ing? Well, in Category:MIRC users for example, you would replace {{User mirc}} with {{subst:User mirc}}. Then you save. Then you edit again and remove the text "]". I can help you out with that if you like, just let me know.--Commander Keane 03:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- You may find that when you follow the procedure I prescribed that the category doesn't properly update. This is a flaw in the Mediawiki software that Misplaced Pages uses. To "refresh" the category you need to null edit each of the pages that should be appearing in the category. You can do that by opening the edit window on each of the pages and saving (no need to change the page). You don't need to do this, the next time each of the userpages is edited it will be "refeshed" and will appear in the category - I'm letting you know why things was appear strange.--Commander Keane 04:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Userboxes
All the 3 userboxes were speedy deleted under the criterion:
- Templates that are polemical or inflammatory
You could have checked this yourself by visiting the Log and searching for the template. You go to Special:Log. Select "Deletion log". Type in the title of the userbox. Example: --Commander Keane 09:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- What you can have on your userpage is discussed at Misplaced Pages:User page. But these userboxes weren't on a user page (having them on your userpage is fine as far as I know) they were in the
Template
namespace. The template namespace is for writing an encylopedia, hence the speedy delteion criterion above. For a place to discuss this ask at Misplaced Pages talk:Userboxes--Commander Keane 10:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Re: Userboxes
I had posted something in this section, but it is basically a repeat of what Commander Keane has said in the previous paragraph. So I have removed my comments. You can check the page history if you want to know what I posted. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 11:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Commas
Hi, I have restored many of the commas to Panama Canal. Please leave them in, as the article is much more readable with them there. For example, this version of the sentence:
- Since opening the canal has been enormously successful and continues to be a key conduit for international shipping.
starts out reading like the sentence:
- Since opening the canal, Paris Hilton has opened many supermarkets.
When the reader gets to "has been...", he/she realises that "since opening the canal" is not actually a cohesive unit, and has to go back and start again. The version with the comma:
- Since opening, the canal has been enormously successful, and continues to be a key conduit for international shipping.
avoids that ambiguity, and hence results in a less awkward read with no false start. Please see the comma article for the many ways in which commas can be used to improve readability by adding appropriate structure to text. BTW, your other changes to that article are helpful and much appreciated. Cheers, — Johan the Ghost seance 13:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)