Revision as of 17:48, 2 February 2011 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →Removing posts from other users' talk pages: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:58, 6 February 2011 edit undoMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →FYI: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
You removed an edit I made on ]. I wonder whether you could please avoid doing so in future, even if you disagree with the views expressed? Jimbo can remove any user's comments from his talk page if he wishes; he may in fact do so with what I wrote, even with a disparaging edit summary, and that does not particularly bother me. Thanks, ] (]) 17:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC) | You removed an edit I made on ]. I wonder whether you could please avoid doing so in future, even if you disagree with the views expressed? Jimbo can remove any user's comments from his talk page if he wishes; he may in fact do so with what I wrote, even with a disparaging edit summary, and that does not particularly bother me. Thanks, ] (]) 17:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
== FYI == | |||
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
* ]; | |||
* ]. | |||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 05:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:58, 6 February 2011
Archives |
Apologies
I didn't notice the template on the Beebe article. Sorry about editing it. Guettarda (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- There's nothing to apologize for; it's fine with me if you want to edit the article. Just because I'm in the process of revising it doesn't mean I don't welcome contributions from other editors, and for me to have that attitude would be WP:OWNERSHIP. --Captain Occam (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- That template is usually a means of saying "I'm in the middle of a long and complicated edit, don't screw this up by editing the page" - Guettarda (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Leg wings
Hey, it's not a bad idea to have something on this but I'm not sure there would be enough material on this for a separate article. Maybe you should try adding it as a subsection in the main wing article (or maybe more appropriately Bird flight) and if its gets to be too much, spin it off from there. Also I'm unaware of anyone proposing that the "hind wings" of Anchiornis actually had any aerodynamic function (they're certainly much smaller than in Microraptor, and the foot feathers of Pedopenna are downright tiny compared to the rest of the leg), so I'm not sure how much verifiable mileage you'll be able to get out of those, other than the fact that they may be homologous with the obviously aerodynamic structures on Microraptor. MMartyniuk (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Letter to The Economist January 29th–February 4th 2011
The ArbCom case on Race and intelligence is mentioned in a letter to The Economist. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Removing posts from other users' talk pages
You removed an edit I made on User talk:Jimbo Wales. I wonder whether you could please avoid doing so in future, even if you disagree with the views expressed? Jimbo can remove any user's comments from his talk page if he wishes; he may in fact do so with what I wrote, even with a disparaging edit summary, and that does not particularly bother me. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
FYI
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for amendment and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)