Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:16, 27 February 2006

User Talk

• Be sure to use article talk pages to discuss article changes.

SAB

Did't the buffalo leave it intact with a comment? Possibly I missed it since there were quite few edits. The title was ridiculously POV. I think it would be good to get the strongest examples that SAB has to offer, so that any rebutal sentences are near impossible. David D. (Talk) 20:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

No, there are serious changes, it needs to be fixed. Funny how the buffalo replies "not a contradiction" and s/he already violated 3RR. Are rebuttals allowed in an encyclopedia? Arbustoo 20:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

if there is a good source. But buffalo's own interpretation will not fly. David D. (Talk) 20:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Those are good ones. Such as the giant; if someone wants to argue a cubit is much smaller than what historians today believe then they will only shrink the size of Noah's Ark (450 cubits). Thereby, by making one or the other highly unlikely. Arbustoo 20:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: homosexuality, is it wise to engage in and is it genetically caused?

See: Homosexuality, is it wise to engage in and is it genetically caused?

ken 21:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)kdbuffalo

Why did you post this on my talk page? Arbustoo 01:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

24.75.30.114 is not Gastritch

24.75.30.114 is User:Kdbuffalo, (Ken DeMeyer), see . He often forgets to log in, for some reason. ---MickWest 00:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Kent Hovind

The link Kitty removed doesn't attribute that quote to Hovind. it attributes it to Hicks. I am therefore removing it. JoshuaZ 01:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Sorry I mean the link that was in Kitty's version and was removed by the anonymous user. JoshuaZ 01:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Quote/link corrected. Arbustoo 03:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Hovind

Nonsense? If you payed attention, you'd know Hovind started the Dinosaur Adventure Land theme park. Nice going, genius.

Don't even have enough guts to sign your own name, Jason. Get a job. You and your PhD are a joke. Arbustoo 03:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Arbustoo, while this may be Jason again, (although I doubt it given their extensive contribution list: ) 80 does seem to be somewhat correct here. I have accordingly modified the page. 68, could you please tone down your language? wikipolicy strongly frowns on ad homs and insults. JoshuaZ 03:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

This newest jason sock has done almost the same edits that the new Wiki4christ and Wiki4Christ has done-- at within a few hours. Arbustoo 03:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, this may be problematic in that 68.* lists a fair number of helpful edits as well. So it seems then Jason is using a computer that others have acess too. JoshuaZ 03:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

A quick IP check shows its an anon. IP. Arbustoo 03:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

my user page.

Um, Arbustoo, I'm a little curious as to why you made my user page non-blank. JoshuaZ 04:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I've been clicking on you user name following the Wiki4Christ puppets and making it appear as a real link makes it easy to follow and lets others know you are not a puppet/new user. Arbustoo 04:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Jack Hyles

ARBUSTOO, PLEASE STOP VALDALIZING WIKI PAGES. IF YOU CANNOT WRITE IN A NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW, THEN DO NOT EDIT.

Dude, chill out. Arbustoo is a highly reasonable editor, and anyways people will pay much more attention to you if don't shout in all caps and bolded. JoshuaZ 00:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

New user, sign up and read Misplaced Pages rules. You cannot POV fork an article because you don't like claims. Innocent or not, criticism is part of the past. Read POV_fork if you wish to debate this further. Arbustoo 01:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Please learn to write in a neutral point of view. Your constant vandalism of this Wiki will not be tolerated. -- moved from user page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.214.212.201 (talk • contribs)

Arbustoo quit vandalizing the Jack Hyles and Hyles Anderson College Wiki. -- moved from user page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.214.212.201 (talk • contribs)

George, you really need to learn the Misplaced Pages rules if you are going to contribute. Blanking pages, such as the article and your talk is in direct violation of the rules. Reverting a page more than 3 times is against the rules. Arbustoo 03:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

George, I recommended you familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages rules. Arbustoo 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

cordial links to Oxford university

What a complete sham. i just noticed that Oxford graduate college page. Cordial links? Does that mean they have phoned up some of the profs in various departments at Oxford University? These universities are so pathetic in their transparent attempts to be linked to Universities with real standing. I am beginning to realise that there are many of these places in the US not just a few scattered examples. I'm amazed this sort of thing is legal and to think they are always crying persecution. Persecution? They have no idea at all, personally i'm surprised they have not been shut down and thrown in jail for fraud. Oh, by the way, good edits on that page and please excuse my rant. David D. (Talk) 22:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind the rant at all. It's good to see people feel the same way about education. Arbustoo 01:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

According to the school's webpage they have 100 students, been in existence since 1980, don't list tuition prices, and have no departments. Arbustoo 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Hyles etc.

I protected the page. Please work toward a consensus on the talk page; afterwards, any edits that contravene that consensus should allow you and the other agreeing editors to make judicious use of reporting any 3RR's. · Katefan0/poll 03:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

I've also added it to my watchlist and will be interjecting ... er, guidance ... when needed ;) · Katefan0/poll 03:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help again. Arbustoo 03:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Your removal of Disputed Tag

Arbustoo, please do not remove the Disputed Tags from the Jack Hyles or First Baptist Church Wikis. As noted in the talk section of the Jack Hyles wiki, these articles are in dispute, hence the tag. Removing them is considered to be vandalism. --Teeja 13:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Even an Admin. removed the tag after you reinserted it. It will be removed if you cannot argue the grounds you put it in. See the talk pages for my response. Arbusto 19:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Hyles Anderson College

Ok, I'll take a look again, although I sort of lost track what was going on there. JoshuaZ 21:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Your fear of Jason Gastrich

I can't believe you just wrote the following in the Bob Cornuke entry:

"Remove Jason Gastrich's self promotion (http://www.jcsm.org/biblelessons/Steeling2002.htm) and revert changes he added without commentary"

What are you even trying to say? It sure looks like you're paranoid about this Gastrich fellow. Here is the information I added. Honestly. What's wrong with it?

"He also speaks at Bible conferences like Steeling the Mind, where he shows video footage and lectures about his travels and discoveries . In 2006, Cornuke is schedule to give a workshop at Louisiana Baptist University's graduation week; the same university where he earned his Ph.D. in 2005."

Except for the hot desire that burns deep in your loins against Gastrich, honestly, what's wrong with it? You were the one complaining about lack of citations for Cornuke speaking at Steeling the Mind . . . now you have them, and you complain that it's Gastrich's site. Did you forget to take your fucking medication? --Jack White1 08:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)