| Revision as of 10:45, 5 October 2009 edit114.76.161.40 (talk) a← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:21, 20 February 2011 edit undoAsdfg12345 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers6,640 edits {{retired}} | ||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired}} | |||
| <blockquote>The Chinese government’s United Front Campaign has been so effective that some foreign individuals and organizations are willing to turn a blind eye to human rights abuses in China and sing the government’s praises in order to further their own interests. I do not wish to dwell on those who bow to the regime, because their kind has existed throughout human history. Yet even in the darkest eras, there have always been people willing to put aside personal interests for the sake of justice and humanity. </blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>A few international human rights organizations have campaigned tirelessly for human rights in China, particularly Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders, and Human Rights in China. The factual information these nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) collect and disseminate under extremely difficult circumstances is a powerful antidote to the disinformation spread by the foreign admirers of the Chinese government. To cite just one example: Freedom in the World 2004: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties (2004 Edition), a report published by the U.S.-based NGO Freedom House, ranked Taiwan the “most free” among Asian countries, fractionally behind Japan. Mainland China was ranked among Asia’s “least free,” only slightly better than North Korea and Saudi Arabia. It is also thanks to the unceasing efforts of these human rights organizations that the treatment of China’s prisoners of conscience has improved since the days of Mao Zedong.</blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>I must also express my admiration for the men and women within China who have never compromised with the regime. Coming from China, I know all too well the price paid by those who refuse to compromise, including being isolated by intellectuals who fear associating with “heretics.” This book names and pays homage to many Chinese journalists who have been imprisoned for their efforts to expose corruption. These men and women of conscience are like a lamp with an ever-burning flame. Others have devoted themselves passionately to furthering freedom of speech, some even paying with their lives. Liu Chengjun, a Falun Gong practitioner, was one of them. On March 5, 2002, Liu and some friends managed to intercept eight cable television networks in Changchun City and Songyuan City, Jilin Province, and televised a program entitled “Self-Immolation or a Staged Act?” exposing the Chinese government’s cover-up of its persecution of Falun Gong and the staged immolation the government claimed was the action of practitioners. Liu was arrested and subjected to 21 months of torture that led directly to his death. He paid with his life, but thanks to his sacrifice, many people learned the truth about the government’s persecution of Falun Gong. </blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>China’s hope lies with the brave men and women who continue to struggle for freedom. This book gives an account of the sacrifices made by heroes in the cause of freedom of the press. Their efforts are changing China little by little. I have learned from a number of World War II documentaries that the Nazi persecution of Jews was welcomed in many European countries because it served the short-term interests of certain governments that collaborated shamefully with Nazi rule. It is my fervent hope that ever fewer foreign companies, organizations, and individuals will sacrifice principle for expediency in regard to China, because the Chinese people desperately need the international support of those who champion democracy and justice. | |||
| A China grounded on a solid foundation of constitutional democracy and integrity in government and politics would make a far more positive contribution to world civilization than today’s China, ruled by a corrupt dictatorship that regards ordinary citizens as worthless, pursues an unprincipled foreign policy, and cares only about its own political interests.</blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>I hope that this book will help lift the veil covering China. Only those who understand the real China can effectively assist the Chinese people in building a free and democratic nation. </blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>I would like to especially express my gratitude to Human Rights in China, the NGO that commissioned, supported, and published my research project on media control in China. The first report I wrote was published in Chinese by HRIC in November 2004.Working on this project, in addition to reading numerous articles and other materials, helped to sort out my own experiences during the many years I worked as a journalist in China, in combination with many articles and other materials I read. For the deeper understanding I gained of the principle of freedom of the press and the history of media control in China, I express my heartfelt thanks to Human Rights in China. </blockquote> | |||
| ::::—], United States, January 6, 2008 | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| {{sockblock}} | |||
| NOTE: I'm going to be unable to do much on wikipedia for several months; personal circumstances. --<font style="bold">]</font><font color="black" style="bold">]</font> 13:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #e7ffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Human Rights Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I, ], grant you this barnstar for your work on the ], expressing gratitude for your efforts to seek out reliable sources and tirelessly initiate rational discussion based on Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. | |||
| |} | |||
| <P ALIGN="CENTER"><span style="font-family:Adobe Garamond Pro Bold; font-size: 36pt; line-height:40px;">METUS EST PLENA TYRANNIS</span></P> | |||
| The purpose of Misplaced Pages is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. | |||
| {{Quotation|'''''Nothing which is intuited in space is a thing in itself, and space is not a form which belongs as a property to things; but objects are quite unknown to us in themselves, and what we call outward objects are nothing else but mere representations of our sensibility, whose form is space, but whose real correlated thing in itself is not known by means of these representations, nor ever can be, but respecting which, in experience, no inquiry is ever made.<br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| '''''The things which we intuit are not in themselves the same as our representation of them in intuition, nor are their relations in themselves so constituted as they appear to us; and if we take away the subject, or even only the subjective constitution of our senses in general, then not only the nature and relations of objects in space and time disappear, but even space and time themselves.<br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| '''''What may be the nature of objects considered as things in themselves and without reference to the receptivity of our sensibility is quite unknown to us. We know nothing more than our own mode of perceiving them, which is peculiar to us and which though not of necessity pertaining to every animated being, is so to the whole human race.<br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| '''''Supposing that we should carry our empirical intuition even to the very highest degree of clearness we should not thereby advance one step nearer to the constitution of objects as things in themselves.'''''|], '']''}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Lessons learnt from wikipedia== | |||
| I have learnt that wikipedia is a testing ground for life, and that there are many lessons in it. One's wikipedia personality is a reflection of oneself: whether people think ill or good of you is often a reflection of how you have behaved towards them, just like in the world. When Spinoza was stabbed, he kept his jacket with the hole in it and hung it in his room as a reminder. I, on the other hand, wrote this while I was banned (22/5/08) for breaking these rules while editing the relatively high-conflict (as far as I can tell?) cycle of articles , so I need to keep it here as a reminder to myself. Maybe others can also benefit. | |||
| ===1. Abandon indignance=== | |||
| I had already learnt this in real life, but it is one thing to learn it and another to really learn it. This is a big and difficult lesson to learn, because it seems like you need to keep relearning it as new things unexpectedly make your indignance swell. These can be petty, or farreaching and deeply unjust. Sometimes in between. In the latter case, indignance may seem a natural response. But I think we need to do better than that, and step up to a higher understanding of cause and effect. In all cases, it is only injustice as it appears, not as it really is. Sometimes the appearance may correspond with the reality, but we have no way of knowing when. So indignance needs to be abandoned. | |||
| ===2. Treat other people with respect=== | |||
| This is also related to the first point. It is hard to treat people you are indignant towards with respect—that is why you can't afford to become indignant in the first place. Respect is a good word because there are two sides to maintaining it. Firstly, by treating other people with respect you do not belittle them or anger them; everyone deserves to be accorded respect, except 十惡不赦的人. Being accorded respect is everyone's original right as a human. The second reason is that if you do not treat other people with respect it is like you are not treating yourself with respect. The best part of everyone is fundamentally good and kind, and that is the true side. If you lose this then you have lost yourself. There is no dignity there. So if you do not treat others with respect, you potentially harm others, but most fundamentally you harm yourself. | |||
| ===3. Practice patience and be calm=== | |||
| This is nearly the same thing, actually. If you don't maintain an equilibrium, and a happy disposition under any circumstances, then you need to go back and do it again because you are not doing it right. You should also apologise to people you were not patient and calm towards, and then apologise to yourself. | |||
| ====3.1 Faith in wikijustice will itself bring about wikijustice==== | |||
| This is inevitable. Simply by believing in the process and patiently going through the motions, i.e. enacting that faith, will make it real. This may seem obvious, but it can be a distant thought if 1, 2, or 3 are transgressed because of external influences. I understand that this is a natural outcome; if your mind is right then the result will be good, if your mind is not right then it won't be good. In my experience this definitely also applies to the real world. | |||
| ===Now for the practical stuff=== | |||
| How this applies: | |||
| *'''1RR''': just don't revert more than once per article per day, simple as that (except for obvious vandalism like someone deletes the whole page and puts “spiderman rulez”) <small>(all credit to ] for this concept)</small> | |||
| *'''If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all'''. Actually, this means to leave out swipes, snide remarks, and all unconstructive or illegitimate comments when saying something. | |||
| *'''Don't respond straight away if you are worked up'''. Take a break and come back in 24 hours, then make sure you follow the second asteriks | |||
| *'''Actually consider what other people say''', and actually take a step back and consider things from a wider perspective and from the point of view of a high-quality encyclopedia. And be willing to compromise; look at things from other peoples' point of view | |||
| I should know myself, but if I break these rules and principles they are based on and do not recognise it, then I would like to have it pointed out to me. | |||
| {{User committed identity|7939df74334bcc717ea4e742b439746c2a91dae0161187d2d7967a7435edf03c|SHA-256|background=#FC5|border=#000}} | |||