Revision as of 22:34, 27 February 2011 editBjmullan (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,478 edits →WP:OR: r← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:57, 27 February 2011 edit undoLemonMonday (talk | contribs)568 edits →WP:ORNext edit → |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
:You mean you can't see anything that uses the words "British Isles". Why not try looking for a reference that does use those words if you're so concerned about them. ] ] 21:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
:You mean you can't see anything that uses the words "British Isles". Why not try looking for a reference that does use those words if you're so concerned about them. ] ] 21:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
::This has been flagged for three weeks and no one has supplied a reference for the claim. It has been removed. As for BI SP that dead. If you want to supply a reference that would be fine. ] (]) 22:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
::This has been flagged for three weeks and no one has supplied a reference for the claim. It has been removed. As for BI SP that dead. If you want to supply a reference that would be fine. ] (]) 22:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:::SP dead? No, I don't think so. Stop trying to delete British Isles for purely political reasons. I thought this stupidity was over now that ] has left off, but seemingly you can't help stirring it. I repeat; the British Isles Special Examples page still stands, as do the sanctions that prevent anyone from adding or deleting British Isles without agreement at that page, and of which you are now in breach. ] ] 22:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
Just checked the reference and I can see nothing about the sentence "he was one of only a small number of players from outside the British Isles who was playing in England" there. Either provide a RS or modify the statement to what the reference says. Anything else is just OR. Bjmullan (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)