| Revision as of 08:39, 28 March 2011 editBulldog123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,423 edits answered on talk page← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:45, 3 April 2011 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits dispute with BearianNext edit → |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. ] (]) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. ] (]) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Thanks. I must have accidentally missed tagging it. ] 08:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Thanks. I must have accidentally missed tagging it. ] 08:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Dispute with Bearian== |
|
|
*Each of you asked for my comment. I'm posting the identical answer on each talk p. Bearian, I've learned not to use the word vandal or vandalism with respect to any established Wikipedian, no matter how unconstructive their editing. (But it does occur fro time to time in my edit summaries when I use a so called "Friendly" template, and if there's a complaint I apologize.) Even when they are actually doing the sort of thing that we would call vandalism if done by a outsider, it tends to evoke hostility. On the underlying dispute, Bulldog, the edits you have been making in removing group identity lists and categories from articles after the categories or lists have survived an XfD discussion, are purely destructive and irrational. I see from your talk page history you have received many warnings about this, and if I had not been myself involved in the arguments about these lists and categories, I would now consider blocking block you, and I will not object if any other admin does so. ''']''' (]) 16:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. VegaDark (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
