| Revision as of 13:36, 1 March 2006 editFloNight (talk | contribs)Administrators20,015 edits Round-tripping; reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:36, 7 March 2006 edit undoFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits →Final decisionNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ==Final decision== | ==Final decision== | ||
| The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the ] case. ] 19:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the ] case. ] 19:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Arbitration decisions may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee or to ]. I am the arbitrator who proposed the decisions which affected you. They are based on your active involvement in the matters under consideration in ]. ] 12:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:36, 7 March 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Henryuzi, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight 04:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've been here before. Henryuzi 06:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
- I know. I recognized your name. I saw it tonight on my watchlist for Min Zhu. Been so long since you edited, I thought you might not be back. Seems the Zhu-Zeleny legal dispute is of interest to you. Interested in learning your opinion about the current articles. Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about the changes. Welcome back to WP! FloNight 06:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- My interests are more general. However, the Zeleny/Zhu/WebEx affair concerns me as an instance of corporate wrongdoing. I believe that this wrongdoing is proven by corporate words and deeds in and around various lawsuits between these parties. I believe that the current articles overlook several aspects of apparent corporate coverup by WebEx. I will try to fix these omissions once the dust settles. Henryuzi 06:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
- I know. I recognized your name. I saw it tonight on my watchlist for Min Zhu. Been so long since you edited, I thought you might not be back. Seems the Zhu-Zeleny legal dispute is of interest to you. Interested in learning your opinion about the current articles. Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about the changes. Welcome back to WP! FloNight 06:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Please look into the latest edit war tracing back to your incorporation of the Min Zhu controversy into the WebEx article. Larvatus 18:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)larvatus
- Will do. Henryuzi 04:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
- Thank you. I would appreciate your testimony in the ongoing arbitration. Larvatus 07:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC)larvatus
- Done. I will honor your request to stay away from topics being arbitrated, as long as the arbitration lasts. Henryuzi 06:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
Shoes of Larvatus
If you step into his shoes and you will be assumed to be him. The penalty applied to him will be applied to you. Fred Bauder 00:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Please clarify your warning. What sort of editing would undermine my right to your assumption of my good faith? Henryuzi 06:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
Round-tripping
Hello Henryuzi. The article round-tripping that you created didn't contain sources. I expanded the article, adding sourced material. I moved the material that remains unsourced to the talk page. If you have sources for this material please added it to the article so the material can be included in the article. regards, FloNight 18:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Round-tripping is clearly documented in WebEx's annual reports. See e.g. its 2003 report , acknowledging on p. 5 that 11% of its revenue comes from distribution partners that admittedly include portals. These portals account for a substantial fraction of WebEx's advertising costs documented on p. 50. Most tellingly, WebEx expressly admits its round-tripping arrangement with "a Chinese reseller" on p. 17. In view of the company's history, the details of the loan arrangement appear to signal self-dealing by its Chinese-connected executives. Please see Sun's annual reports for similar corroboration. Please restore the information accordingly. Misplaced Pages wouldn't want to think that you are partial to coverups of corporate shenanigans. Henryuzi 05:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)henryuzi
- Henryuzi, thank-you for the feedback. FloNight 13:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Final decision
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/WebEx and Min Zhu case. Raul654 19:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Arbitration decisions may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee or to User:Jimbo Wales. I am the arbitrator who proposed the decisions which affected you. They are based on your active involvement in the matters under consideration in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/WebEx and Min Zhu. Fred Bauder 12:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)