Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bsadowski1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:41, 18 June 2011 view sourceJBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators195,825 edits →Unblock request: Removing message which duplicates one from another person.← Previous edit Revision as of 09:48, 18 June 2011 view source Bsadowski1 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators16,812 edits →Sockpuppet?: Doh, they're not an "it"Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 77: Line 77:


You blocked ] as having an inappropriate user name (which is obviously true), impersonation (which I'm having trouble understanding if they were blocked before making any edits) and sockpuppetry. The editor has repeatedly requested an unblock to change their username, and has been declined multiple times. Their most recent request was on their ]. I'm inclined to unblock, but the sockpuppetry charge gives me pause; do you recall who they were suspected of being a sockpuppet of, and why? Thank you. -- ''']'''] 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC) You blocked ] as having an inappropriate user name (which is obviously true), impersonation (which I'm having trouble understanding if they were blocked before making any edits) and sockpuppetry. The editor has repeatedly requested an unblock to change their username, and has been declined multiple times. Their most recent request was on their ]. I'm inclined to unblock, but the sockpuppetry charge gives me pause; do you recall who they were suspected of being a sockpuppet of, and why? Thank you. -- ''']'''] 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
:It could of been a sockpuppet at the time. But the username (impersonation? of SineBot) along with another reason I forgot they looked like a sock. Feel free to unblock them now, but they should really consider a username change. --]]] 09:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


== nonsence in Butrimonys section == == nonsence in Butrimonys section ==

Revision as of 09:48, 18 June 2011

Hello, Bsadowski1, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, add a question to the Misplaced Pages:Help Desk or ask me on my Talk page. If you have any suggestions about how to improve this welcome, message, let me know. Again, welcome! JesseW 19:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bsadowski1. You have new messages at Voceditenore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks again!

I see our sweet little sexually confused boy-chick from Singapore is on the loose again. Thanks for blocking the idiot. I've gone one better and imposed a 0/16 block for the next six months and I'll do the same for any subsequent IPs this dinglefritz decides to use. You da man. Thanks much. PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Block settings

Why is it that when you block block-evaders, you typically do not allow them to use Emailuser or edit their talk page? Is that because you are trying to make them appeal the block on their main account? Just curious.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

  • There are particular vandals who have a history of talk page and email abuse, and their socks get the full block on sight. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Absolutely. The idea is to prevent them from wasting our time. Hit them with the flyswatter. Absolutely no point in engaging: ignore. They're not worth your time. Antandrus (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Solipsism blocks (as I call them) are reserved for long-term abusers whose MO post-block is to abuse talk page or email privileges. If an admin's whipping out the solipsism block on sight or first offense, odds are there's a LOBU user behind the façade. —Jeremy v^_^v 03:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Timeline of Philippine–American War articl

I see that you have edited the Timeline of Philippine–American War article in the not too distant past. I have recently started on a rewrite of that article, and am soliciting input and participation from interested editors. If interested, please see Talk:Timeline of Philippine–American War#Some edits to conform this articles to other articles for more info. Please comment there as appropriate. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

LOL

Guess who's using an open proxy from the Syrian ARAB Republic? xD - Alison 07:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

What's the damn use?

Gonna e-mail you. Keep a weather eye open, matey. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?

You blocked SineBot1 as having an inappropriate user name (which is obviously true), impersonation (which I'm having trouble understanding if they were blocked before making any edits) and sockpuppetry. The editor has repeatedly requested an unblock to change their username, and has been declined multiple times. Their most recent request was on their IP talk page. I'm inclined to unblock, but the sockpuppetry charge gives me pause; do you recall who they were suspected of being a sockpuppet of, and why? Thank you. -- Atama頭 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

It could of been a sockpuppet at the time. But the username (impersonation? of SineBot) along with another reason I forgot they looked like a sock. Feel free to unblock them now, but they should really consider a username change. --Bsadowski1 09:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

nonsence in Butrimonys section

Butrimonys massacre

On 9 September 1941, shortly after the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, the Jews of Butrimonys were massacred by Einsatzgruppen and Lithuanian collaborators. Rounded up and marched along a road, they were lined up beside a mass grave and machine-gunned. According to the Jäger Report, 740 Jews were murdered in one day: 67 men, 370 women, and 303 children. what????????????? in the whole town lived only 600 and only 300 were jews, so where others came from?????? if in other surrounding cities supposedly other local jews were killed???? did jews came from the hell????? or it is a fraud??? and show me bones of those 740 people supposedly killed there...where bones have disappeared??????

Do you have a reliable source for your information? A source is provided for the article's information, so unless you have another source which backs your version and which would be counted as more reliable, what is in the article should stay. -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\ 23:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
To be precise, where did you get the population of 600 and the Jewish population of 300? If you can provide a reliable source for that, we can look into this further. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:22, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
  1. Austin, Ben (1997). "The Einsatzgruppen -- Mobile Killing Units". Middle Tennessee State University.