Revision as of 00:12, 13 March 2006 editBlatherAndBlatherscite (talk | contribs)35 edits →Hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 13 March 2006 edit undoChick Bowen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,743 edits Personal attacksNext edit → | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
Mohammed's father was named Abd'Allah, because he was to be a priest for the moon deity Allah, one of the hundreds of pagan gods worshiped and enshrined in the Kaaba. This is fact, not fiction, and it should not be hidden just because muslims want to hide their pagan past. ] 00:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC) | Mohammed's father was named Abd'Allah, because he was to be a priest for the moon deity Allah, one of the hundreds of pagan gods worshiped and enshrined in the Kaaba. This is fact, not fiction, and it should not be hidden just because muslims want to hide their pagan past. ] 00:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Personal attacks == | |||
Please note that is absolutely unacceptable for Misplaced Pages. Read ]--we do not allow attacks on other users, and ethnically motivated ones are particularly intolerable. If you continue in this vein you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ] 00:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:47, 13 March 2006
This page is yours. Feel free to say whatever you want. Constructive feedbacks would be more than appreciated. --Aucaman 12:21, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Archives |
---|
Persian Jews
About your edit: How is Iranian revolution a POV? --Kash 22:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
If it is not, then why is it mentioned in the article? all you did was change the heading! --Kash 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Again, you seem to miss the point, the article is written for everyone to read, headings such as 1979 doesn't make sense, if it was just the Jews in Iran, and the article is about Persian Jews, it seems pretty relevant that Iranian revolution should be used as the heading of the related section. And whats more silly is that you have renamed it as a 'POV', I doubt any contributers who put that is a Jewish Persian (from Iran, or outside!) --Kash 02:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Are Afghan Jews really relevant to Persian Jews? --Kash 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Turkish people
I think the matter is resolved now, but thanks for your suggestion anyways. --Khoikhoi 06:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Persian Jews
Yes, Zoroastrians are called Zarthosti in Persian. Stop reading so much into things and assume good faith. SouthernComfort 19:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Why the antagonism to the sentence anyway? SouthernComfort 19:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- In the Persian language there are no terms in reference to Persian Jews specifically. In general, Jewish people are referred to by two common terms, kalimi, which is considered the most proper term, and yahudi, which is less formal. Don't you think that this is actually informative and relevant? SouthernComfort 19:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Which part do you object to exactly? SouthernComfort 19:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The whole thing doesn't make any sense. What's the reader supposed to take out from this? Aucaman 19:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The article is about Persian Jews - it is meant to clarify that there is no Persian language equivalent for terms like "Persian Jew" or "Parsim" (which is included in the beginning). If you don't like that part and think it's obvious, you can remove it, but it's just atating a basic fact. The second part is simply providing the Persian language terms for Jewish people, and clarifying which term is more proper than the other, since the article is about Persian Jews, so why not include the Persian language terms for Jews as well? Why is that offensive to you? SouthernComfort 19:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Request for Comments
A user conduct request for comments has been filed against you. Please read it and respond to it. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Aucaman Robert McClenon 00:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
User:Cool Cat's "neutrality problems"
see: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek#POV editing by Coolcat
The rest of the case makes interesting reading.
--Moby 12:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Three-Revert Rule
As you may be aware, Misplaced Pages prohibits more than three reverts on any one article per day (see WP:3RR). Please be careful when editing Parsi (ethnic group) in order to ensure that you comply, as otherwise you may be blocked for up to a day. Thanks, and happy editing! Stifle 02:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question. Voice-of-All 06:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- I am unblocking you on the condition that you use the talk page instead and follow 1RR (yes 1RR) on the article's page until a comprimise/agreement is worked out. Voice-of-All 07:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
With all due repsect this is so unfair. The user Aucaman has been warned already three times since Feb. He has also reverted on the Persian people article, please check the history of that page, and he starts many edit wars simultanously. His activities are off-the-chart. Why is much exception being given to him, while other users are blocked promptly? Please look into it, and reconsider your decision.Zmmz 08:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- I talked to him on AIM and he agreed to the conditions. However, if he breaks them, I will have to re-block. There does seem to be some reasonable misunderstanding. I will take previous edit warring warnind into account. Voice-of-All 08:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
You can go here for a review on his activities. I have never seen an editor getting away with so much, as this user does.Zmmz 08:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Iranian editors
I know enough about Indian politics to "place" Indian editors when they argue for one or the other edit, but I'm not really tuned into the varieties of Iranian politics, or Iranian nationalism. I'm starting to get a sense that there's a version that believes in Greater Iran and that some of the editors now on board adhere to that. I also sense that Arabs and Jews are not liked, though no one seems to admit that straight out. When I say it, I get denials. But when people want to attack me, they call me an Arab or a Jew.
I suppose it's predictable that if you oppose them you should be accused of being "anti-Iranian", just as those of us "USAians" who oppose Bush get accused of being "anti-American". I just want the best for everyone, and I don't think that truculent nationalism, or militaristic irredentism, on anyone's part, is in anyone's best interests. Zora 08:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
???
Yes I did withdraw from Misplaced Pages because the Persian ultra-nationalist editors started calling me a "separatist" because I did not follow their party line. Wikipedias Iran-related pages are ruled by these partisan people. They will not even accept the term "Ahwazi", although it is frequently mentioned in human rights reports. They hate Arabs more than they hate the mullahs running Iran. Thats why they wont have any discussion on the issue. They even want to reduce the Arab population to "half a million" at one point.
I have just changed the population figure for Ahwazi Arabs on the page to the latest figure mentioned by the US State Department which say 2-4 million or more. I can bet you that they will use their force of numbers to keep it at 1-2 million. It is on this kind of issue that I just give up. Misplaced Pages's pages on Iran are inaccurate and one-sided, but only the rich Persians in America have the time and money to maintain their lies on Misplaced Pages. In the end, who cares? In reality they want no Arabs in Iran.
These nationalist Misplaced Pages editors want a holocaust against Arabs. You know what these types call Ahwazi Arabs? Indians! They think that is insulting. What a joke! Hinduism is a Persian-derived religion! If being Indian is insulting then they are insulting themselves.
We know the truth about Al-Ahwaz and we know abouty cultural cleansing and even the UN and Amnesty document this well. If some Misplaced Pages editors want to lie then let them because no-one will take these Misplaced Pages pages seriously if they are just written by Persian nationalists.--Ahwaz 09:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Parsi
I'm going to have to disagree with you on Parsi. I think the material on genetic testing should be restored. It doesn't belong at the head of the article -- it's just too complex for an intro. However, it is a dispute re whether or not Parsis really were endogamous, and all sides should be reported. Zora 09:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Payandeh Iran
Dorood bar Iran sarzamin Parsian. Koroush Kabir dar ghabr khud khahad larzid agar befahamad ke yahoodi ke aan bozorgvaar az zanjir azad kard o panah daad, ingoneh namak mikhorad vaa namaak-dan mishakanad. Amaa bedaan ey mozdoor ke koroush asoodeh khahad khabid, ziraa ke farzandanash bidaarand vaa as miras vey paasdari khahand kard! Payandeh Iran! User:201.252.133.159 12 March 2006
You can always spot a fake Persian - this one (with a US-based IP) made three attempts to write in Farsi and it is still bullshit! This kind of abuse is what you can expect when you don't agree with people who have racist views about Arabs.--Ahwaz 13:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Khamoosh ey yahoodi. Agar Koroush adamkosh bood ke tou alan injaa naboodi ke? Tou injaei chon ke koroush be ajdadet rahm kard. Boro tarikh melatet ro bekhun bani-israel!
- You will get used to this abuse, Aucaman. There is a deep hatred of Arabs and Jews among some Persian ultra-nationalists. On Misplaced Pages, I have given up fighting some of it, just the worst elements. You will too because they grind you down with abuse. Take it from me, the person doing this vandalism is a Wikipedian who is too cowardly to put their name to the abuse. It is a tactic learnt from their experience of ethnic cleansing in Al-Ahwaz.--Ahwaz 14:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Johood!
Sepas kon koroush kabir raa ke ghomaat raa nejaat dad! speaas kon melat Iran raa ke be ghomaat panah dadand! sepas kon Iran o Irani raa ke be tou bee-khaneh khaneh o hoviat dadand! sepas kon!
- Get a Life! 24.203.137.88 16:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Holi greetings. --Bhadani 13:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Allah
regarding , have you ever studied islamic history? Really studied I mean, not just what islamic revisionists want it to be.
Mohammed's father was named Abd'Allah, because he was to be a priest for the moon deity Allah, one of the hundreds of pagan gods worshiped and enshrined in the Kaaba. This is fact, not fiction, and it should not be hidden just because muslims want to hide their pagan past. BlatherAndBlatherscite 00:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Please note that this is absolutely unacceptable for Misplaced Pages. Read Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks--we do not allow attacks on other users, and ethnically motivated ones are particularly intolerable. If you continue in this vein you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chick Bowen 00:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)