Misplaced Pages

User:Aucaman/read/adminship: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Aucaman | read Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:01, 15 March 2006 editAucaman (talk | contribs)2,729 edits rvv← Previous edit Revision as of 00:03, 15 March 2006 edit undoZmmz (talk | contribs)3,855 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


]<sup>]</sup> 04:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC) ]<sup>]</sup> 04:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I`m not suer if user ] is qualified for such judgements since he has been reported an abusive editors in Misplaced Pages.] 00:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:03, 15 March 2006

A number of administrators here don't seem to be familiar with the intricacies and complexities that comes with the dispute process on Misplaced Pages. I'm assuming most of it has to do with the lack of personal involvment in disputes. Reverting vandalism, running bots, and welcoming new editors are notable contributions, but dealing with other users and involvement in disputes are just as important.

As such, to ensure a higher quality and standards, and to encourage more direct involvement in disputes, this user is going to categorically oppose adminship for users whose Talk namespace edits number less than 400 OR less than 10% of their total edits. Exception are possible, but don't count on it.

Aucaman 04:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I`m not suer if user User:Aucaman is qualified for such judgements since he has been reported an abusive editors in Misplaced Pages.Zmmz 00:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)