Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:49, 15 July 2011

This user has a zero tolerance policy towards trolls on Misplaced Pages.

Estonia-Russia relations

Hey man, could you take a look at Estonia–Russia_relations#Meetings and add anything that you think needs to be added, NPOV'ed etc. Personally, I don't think too much needs to be written on the incident, but the section as it was written before was a laugh. On a sidenote, I was almost going to use this photo in the article, but almost immediately recognised how ironic the photo really is, in a funny kind of way, don't you think? :) --Russavia 10:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, with regard to categories I'll have to admit, that I have way too little wikitime to initiate anything during the few weeks to come. I'll have to break my promise! I'd just advise you to use your common sense, e.g. I recently reverted some IP additions like this (already populated with numerous categories), whilst letting the same (trivial) category stay, where few others were present. My point would be to use only categories that are useful for finding information without overwhelming the pages with trivial stuff as the case may be, but I even don't know what the exact practice is these days :O
Your edits here look fine to me, we'll see in the future if I find anything to add to or change in the article. Btw, as far as the pic is concerned, if the, well, positioning is what makes you ironic, then this simply means we here in Estonia have some more work to do :D. But then again, the Elections are forthcoming, too. Regards, Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 12:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Good to see that ironic positioning wasn't lost on you either. LOL. I know the information that I have placed may not be perfect, but I know it's better than what was there previously. I love the quote from one of the articles which basically says that Ilves and Kosachev's comments wouldn't really affect Estonia-Russia relations, because, fuck, they are already pretty much right in the shitter at the moment. LOL. Although I guess Ilves' attending the Victory Day Parade in 2010 has made some solid inroads in the slow rebuilding of basically non-existent cordial relations. Having said that, the entire article is in need of a rewrite in the future, I am sure that someone will get off their arse and do it at some stage (*nudge*). As to cats, perhaps someone reading this will take it upon themselves to do the job that neither of us really seem to want to take on. Talk ya soon, --Russavia 12:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Arb amendment

Hey mate, I have started an amendment request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request_to_amend_WP:EEML_and_WP:ARBRB to have the interaction ban between you and I rescinded. Given that we have both ignored the Committee's ridiculous restrictions that they placed on us interacting since they placed the initial one a year and a half ago, I guess we should have them remove it. If you want to co-sign my request, feel free to do so, or add under your own section. Cheers, --Russavia 15:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Russavia-Miacek interaction ban

I read with interest the request to void the interaction ban between Russavia and you. I opined at the thread that I support the amendment request, and I also thought I would let you and Russavia know that I am pleased to see that there is hope that some of the editors involved in the EEML case can collaborative productively with some of the others. Such an event is rare, and therefore refreshing. Good luck in your editing going forward, in the even that the amendment request is indeed granted. Regards, AGK 21:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

United Russia

Since you're one of the most active editors on the article, what is your opinion of this? I think the new editor is a bit disruptive (and not just on this article). Nanobear (talk) 11:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list and Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys

By motion voted upon at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:

The remedies of the Eastern European mailing list and Russavia-Biophys cases are amended to permit bilateral interactions between User:Russavia and User:Miacek.

For the Arbitration Committee, Salvio 01:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Discuss this

Don't be an asshole

Cut out the personal attacks. These kinds of edit summaries , especially coming from someone like you, are simply not acceptable.Volunteer Marek (talk) 11:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing perfectly valid stuff just because it doesn't fit you Polish 'Derzhavist' sentiments. There have been many glorious events in the Polish history, but there have been events that aren't that great. Trying to conceal those whilst endlessly whining about real or imagined injustice done to Poles by Germans or Russians is sort of hypocritical. As for “especially coming from someone like you” this is kinda pointless an argument. I'm definitely no supporter of Russian or German nationalism and nor am I polonophobe. I'm just someone who'd let the history be as it was, instead of trying to whitewash one side and smear the other, as some guys are doing.Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 11:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

You didn't even bother looking at the talk page before reverting. All that junk was put in by Vlad F. and it's a dubious mischaracterization of sources. It's his usual POV pushing nonsense. You did not participate in that discussion or make any comment except insults and false accusations in the edit summary. You just reverted it because it was anti-Polish and you seem to have some kind of a weird obsession on the point of Poles.

And remember. *I* was on the EEML list with you - though at the time I (unfortunately) didn't pay much attention to the messages you were sending, so *I do actually know* what your politics are like; and it's not what you're trying to pretend on Misplaced Pages, now or before . And you REALLY need to quit attacking people for being "nationalist" (in your own mind) on Misplaced Pages. How would you feel if the next time I reverted one of your edits I used the edit summary (basically reverting POV-pushing once again purssued by users who recommend Holocaust denial websites as good reading). Hypothetically speaking of course.Volunteer Marek (talk) 11:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)