Misplaced Pages

Catholics for Choice: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:41, 16 July 2011 editJorgePeixoto (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,199 edits Condom promotion: Commenting out section that lacks notability, as agreed in talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 15:03, 16 July 2011 edit undoJorgePeixoto (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,199 edits Partial revert of Roscelese's edits; see no reason for removing that criticismNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
'''Catholics for Choice (CFC),''' formerly '''Catholics for a Free Choice''', is a ] organization based in ] that was founded in 1973 "to serve as a voice for Catholics who believe that the Catholic tradition supports a woman's moral and legal right to follow her conscience in matters of sexuality and reproductive health."<ref></ref> It is currently led by President Jon O'Brien. '''Catholics for Choice (CFC),''' formerly '''Catholics for a Free Choice''', is a ] organization based in ] that was founded in 1973 "to serve as a voice for Catholics who believe that the Catholic tradition supports a woman's moral and legal right to follow her conscience in matters of sexuality and reproductive health."<ref></ref> It is currently led by President Jon O'Brien.


The ] states that CFC is not a Catholic organization.<ref name=notcatholic></ref> The ] states that CFC is not a Catholic organization
<!--
I ARGUE THE TEXT BELOW SHOULD BE HERE. SINCE THE USCCB IS THE PUBLIC VOICE OF THE CHURCH IN THE USA, DULY REPRESENTING ITS ASSESSMENT IS NOT UNDUE WEIGHT; LEAVING IT COMMENTED OUT FOR NOW
, and "its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life"
-->
.<ref name=notcatholic></ref><ref name=NewYorkTimes></ref>


== History == == History ==
Line 48: Line 53:
* Promote condoms<ref></ref> * Promote condoms<ref></ref>
* Explore diversity of views within the Catholic tradition<ref></ref>{{Failed verification|date=July 2011}} * Explore diversity of views within the Catholic tradition<ref></ref>{{Failed verification|date=July 2011}}
* "Get the Vatican, the Holy See, booted from its status as a non-member state permanent observer"<ref>, retrieved in 2011-07-14</ref><ref name="dburke2007"/> * "Get the Vatican, the Holy See, booted from its status as a non-member state permanent observer"<ref>, retrieved in 2011-07-14</ref><ref name="dburke2007"/><ref> , retrieved in 2011-07-14</ref><ref> , retrieved 2011-07-14</ref>
* Overturn ] that protect medical practitioners who refuse to perform abortions from disciplinary or legal sanctions.<ref>CFC press release 6 October 2010: "Conscience Clauses and Reproductive Rights in Europe - Who Decides?"</ref> * Overturn ] that protect medical practitioners who refuse to perform abortions from disciplinary or legal sanctions.<ref>CFC press release 6 October 2010: "Conscience Clauses and Reproductive Rights in Europe - Who Decides?"</ref>


Line 68: Line 73:
=== The Church === === The Church ===


The ] has made the statement that " is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the NCCB," and that "its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life."<ref name=notcatholic/> The ] has made the statement that " is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the NCCB," and that "its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life."<ref name=notcatholic/><ref name=NewYorkTimes/> The organization ] states that CFC's theological arguments directly contradict the Catholic Church's teaching on abortion and contraception.<ref></ref>{{Better source|date=July 2011}}


Bishop ] of ] issued an interdict in March 1996 forbidding Catholics within his diocese from membership in twelve organizations, operating locally, where membership is described as ''"...always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible..."'', in a letter of formal canonical warning published in the diocesan newspaper, the Southern Nebraska Register. Catholics for Choice was the last of the twelve organizations. Members of the diocese were given one month from the date of the interdict to remove themselves from participation in the named organizations or face automatic excommunication.<ref></ref> Bishop ] of ] issued an interdict in March 1996 forbidding Catholics within his diocese from membership in twelve organizations, operating locally, where membership is described as ''"...always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible..."'', in a letter of formal canonical warning published in the diocesan newspaper, the Southern Nebraska Register. Catholics for Choice was the last of the twelve organizations. Members of the diocese were given one month from the date of the interdict to remove themselves from participation in the named organizations or face automatic excommunication.<ref></ref>


=== Other critics === === Other critics ===
Critics of Catholics for Choice argue that only a negligible fraction of CFC's income come from subscription fees and over 97% of its funds are donated by tax-exempt groups and private foundations<ref>Richard Doerflinger, “Who Are Catholics for Choice?” Supplement to the Catholic League Newsletter, n.d.; reprinted from America, November 16, 1985; no pagination.</ref> including the ].<ref> LiveAction.org, June 19, 2011. Retrieved 2011-07-14.</ref><ref name=NewYorkTimes/>

Helen M. Alvaré, an associate professor of law at the Catholic University of America, stated “They had no grass-roots base among Catholics. There was nothing very different about them from other pro-choice groups in the arguments they made.”<ref name=NewYorkTimes></ref> Helen M. Alvaré, an associate professor of law at the Catholic University of America, stated “They had no grass-roots base among Catholics. There was nothing very different about them from other pro-choice groups in the arguments they made.”<ref name=NewYorkTimes></ref>


=== Accusations of anti-Catholicism === === Accusations of anti-Catholicism ===
The ] and the ] have described the organization as ].<ref> Catholic League, Dec. 3, 2009</ref><ref> CNA July 24, 2006</ref><ref name=NewYorkTimes/>


The US Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that "The public relations effort has ridiculed the Holy See in language reminiscent of other episodes of anti-Catholic bigotry that the Catholic Church has endured in the past."<ref name=notcatholic/> The US Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that "The public relations effort has ridiculed the Holy See in language reminiscent of other episodes of anti-Catholic bigotry that the Catholic Church has endured in the past."<ref name=notcatholic/><ref name=NewYorkTimes/>


In response to similar accusations, theologian, ecofeminist and CFC board member ] wrote that CFC was part of a schism rather than a proponent of anti-Catholic bigotry; that the accusation was an attempt to portray the "Catholic right" as the only authentic Catholics; and that "the charge of 'anti-Catholicism' is being used as a scare tactic by the Catholic right in the service of repression of progressive Catholic views."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/conscience/archives/c2000autumn_mantraofanticatholicism.asp |title=The Mantra of Anti-Catholicism |work=Conscience: The Newsjournal of Catholic Opinion |date=Autumn 2000 |first=Rosemary Radford |last=Ruether}}</ref>{{Better source|date=July 2011}} In response to similar accusations, theologian, ecofeminist and CFC board member ] wrote that CFC was part of a schism rather than a proponent of anti-Catholic bigotry; that the accusation was an attempt to portray the "Catholic right" as the only authentic Catholics; and that "the charge of 'anti-Catholicism' is being used as a scare tactic by the Catholic right in the service of repression of progressive Catholic views."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/conscience/archives/c2000autumn_mantraofanticatholicism.asp |title=The Mantra of Anti-Catholicism |work=Conscience: The Newsjournal of Catholic Opinion |date=Autumn 2000 |first=Rosemary Radford |last=Ruether}}</ref>{{Better source|date=July 2011}}

Revision as of 15:03, 16 July 2011

Catholics for Choice
AbbreviationCFC
Formation1973
Purposepro-choice advocacy
HeadquartersWashington, D.C.
PresidentJon O'Brien
Websitehttp://www.catholicsforchoice.org/

Catholics for Choice (CFC), formerly Catholics for a Free Choice, is a pro-choice organization based in Washington, D.C. that was founded in 1973 "to serve as a voice for Catholics who believe that the Catholic tradition supports a woman's moral and legal right to follow her conscience in matters of sexuality and reproductive health." It is currently led by President Jon O'Brien.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) states that CFC is not a Catholic organization .

History

CFC was founded in by Joan Harriman, Patricia Fogarty McQuillan, and Meta Mulcahy, as Catholics for a Free Choice, to promote access to abortion in the context of Catholic tradition. Its first president was Joseph O'Rourke. O'Rourke was expelled from the Jesuit order in September 1974 after he baptized the baby of a pro-choice woman against his superior's orders. This was preceded by a long trail of discontent, often testing the authority of the Church. CFC emerged from Catholics for the Elimination of All Restrictive Abortion & Contraceptive Laws, a New York lobby group that had been formed in 1970.

O'Rourke remained as president of CFC until 1979, when Pat McMahon was hired as Executive Director. McMahon shifted CFFC's legal status from a lobby to an educational association, opening the group up to tax-exempt status and to foundation support. One result of this was a $75,000 grant on behalf of the pro-choice Sunnen Foundation which funded the group's first publications, the Abortion in Good Faith series.

In 1978 Frances Kissling joined the group, and in 1982 she was made president. She lobbied politicians and activists, many Catholic, to work in favor of giving women access to abortions and to contraception.

In October 1984, Catholics for Choice (then Catholics for a Free Choice) placed an advertisement signed by over one hundred prominent Catholics, including nuns, in the New York Times. The advertisement stated that "direct abortion...can sometimes be a moral choice" and that "responsible moral decisions can only be made in an atmosphere of freedom from fear of coercion." The Vatican took disciplinary measures against some of the nuns who signed the statement, sparking controversy among American Catholics, and intra-Catholic conflict on the abortion issue remained news for at least two years.

Kissling led CFC until her retirement in February 2007. CFC's former Vice-President and Director of Communications Jon O'Brien was subsequently appointed as the organization's new President.

CFC was part of a successful drive to prevent John M. Klink, a delegate from the Holy See, from being appointed leader of the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration. CFC has assisted in writing legislation to increase funds for family planning and thus decrease the number of abortions.


Criticism

The Church

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has made the statement that " is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the NCCB," and that "its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life." The organization Priests for Life states that CFC's theological arguments directly contradict the Catholic Church's teaching on abortion and contraception.

Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska issued an interdict in March 1996 forbidding Catholics within his diocese from membership in twelve organizations, operating locally, where membership is described as "...always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible...", in a letter of formal canonical warning published in the diocesan newspaper, the Southern Nebraska Register. Catholics for Choice was the last of the twelve organizations. Members of the diocese were given one month from the date of the interdict to remove themselves from participation in the named organizations or face automatic excommunication.

Other critics

Critics of Catholics for Choice argue that only a negligible fraction of CFC's income come from subscription fees and over 97% of its funds are donated by tax-exempt groups and private foundations including the Ford Foundation.

Helen M. Alvaré, an associate professor of law at the Catholic University of America, stated “They had no grass-roots base among Catholics. There was nothing very different about them from other pro-choice groups in the arguments they made.”

Accusations of anti-Catholicism

The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights and the Catholic News Agency have described the organization as anti-Catholic.

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that "The public relations effort has ridiculed the Holy See in language reminiscent of other episodes of anti-Catholic bigotry that the Catholic Church has endured in the past."

In response to similar accusations, theologian, ecofeminist and CFC board member Rosemary Radford Ruether wrote that CFC was part of a schism rather than a proponent of anti-Catholic bigotry; that the accusation was an attempt to portray the "Catholic right" as the only authentic Catholics; and that "the charge of 'anti-Catholicism' is being used as a scare tactic by the Catholic right in the service of repression of progressive Catholic views."

References

  1. Catholics for Choice- About Us
  2. ^ U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops - Office of Communications
  3. ^ The New York Times. Backing Abortion Rights While Keeping the Faith. Banerjee, Neela. February 27, 2007 Cite error: The named reference "NewYorkTimes" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. Priest Expelled for Forbidden Baptism Sarasota Herald-Tribune, p. 4b, Oct. 18, 1975
  5. "When the swallows come back to Capistrano" Bottum, Joseph. First Things, Oct. 1, 2006. at highbeam.com. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
  6. Dillon, Michele (1999). Catholic identity: balancing reason, faith, and power. Cambridge University Press. p. 106.
  7. "After 25 Years, a Catholic Warrior Steps Aside" Burke, Daniel. Religion News Service. 2007-02-22. at CFC website. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
  8. Fr. Frank Pavone to Francis Kissling: Being Catholic is not a game
  9. Extra-Synodal Legislation: Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz
  10. Richard Doerflinger, “Who Are Catholics for Choice?” Supplement to the Catholic League Newsletter, n.d.; reprinted from America, November 16, 1985; no pagination.
  11. “Catholics for Choice” Nets $300,000 Grant From Foundation Planned Parenthood CEO Helps Lead LiveAction.org, June 19, 2011. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
  12. "Catholics for Choice Needs to Convert" Catholic League, Dec. 3, 2009
  13. Pro-Marxist, anti-Catholic groups unite to attack Mexican Bishops CNA July 24, 2006
  14. Ruether, Rosemary Radford (Autumn 2000). "The Mantra of Anti-Catholicism". Conscience: The Newsjournal of Catholic Opinion.

External links

Categories: