| Revision as of 17:50, 16 March 2006 view sourceSCZenz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,321 edits →Works for me: do you intend to make this a permanent switch?← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:53, 16 March 2006 view source SCZenz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,321 edits →Works for me: add sentence - if swithc permanent, arbcom case not really necessaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Your new welcome message with the signature link works for me; thanks. Now about those ] edit summaries of yours... ;-) —] (]) 16:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | Your new welcome message with the signature link works for me; thanks. Now about those ] edit summaries of yours... ;-) —] (]) 16:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Uh, ditto; I don't care to bug anyone about what's in his signature. Karmafist, you intend to switch away from the old method, to this new method, on a permanent basis? -- ] 17:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | :Uh, ditto; I don't care to bug anyone about what's in his signature. Karmafist, you intend to switch away from the old method, to this new method, on a permanent basis? If so, I really don't think the ArbCom case is necessary.-- ] 17:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 16 March 2006
- User_talk:Karmafist/POTW Archive
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive1
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive2
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive3
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive4
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive5
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive6
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive7
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive8
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive9
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive10
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive11
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive12
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive13
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive14
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive15
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive16
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive17
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive18
- User_talk:Karmafist/Archive19
Works for me
Your new welcome message with the signature link works for me; thanks. Now about those WP:POINT edit summaries of yours... ;-) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Uh, ditto; I don't care to bug anyone about what's in his signature. Karmafist, you intend to switch away from the old method, to this new method, on a permanent basis? If so, I really don't think the ArbCom case is necessary.-- SCZenz 17:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)