Misplaced Pages

Absence of good: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:00, 11 August 2010 editNo, you take a hike (talk | contribs)108 editsm moved Privatio boni to Privatio Boni← Previous edit Revision as of 22:23, 30 July 2011 edit undo81.107.150.246 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Unreferenced|date=April 2007}}'''''Privatio Boni''''' can be loosely translated as "privation of good." It is a ] ] that ] are, in some circumstances at least, ]. Strictly speaking, it holds that evil is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading: it would be more constructive to speak only of it as the lack of good. {{Unreferenced|date=April 2007}}'''''Privatio Boni''''' is a Latin phrase which can be translated as "privation of good." It is a ] ] that Evil, unlike Good, is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading. Instead, Evil is rather the absence or lack of good.


It is typically attributed to ], who wrote: It is typically attributed to ], who wrote:

Revision as of 22:23, 30 July 2011

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Absence of good" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Privatio Boni is a Latin phrase which can be translated as "privation of good." It is a theological doctrine that Evil, unlike Good, is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading. Instead, Evil is rather the absence or lack of good.

It is typically attributed to St. Augustine of Hippo, who wrote:

And in the universe, even that which is called evil, when it is regulated and put in its own place, only enhances our admiration of the good; for we enjoy and value the good more when we compare it with the evil. For the Almighty God, who, as even the heathen acknowledge, has supreme power over all things, being Himself supremely good, would never permit the existence of anything evil among His works, if He were not so omnipotent and good that He can bring good even out of evil. For what is that which we call evil but the absence of good? In the bodies of animals, disease and wounds mean nothing but the absence of health; for when a cure is effected, that does not mean that the evils which were present—namely, the diseases and wounds—go away from the body and dwell elsewhere: they altogether cease to exist; for the wound or disease is not a substance, but a defect in the fleshly substance,—the flesh itself being a substance, and therefore something good, of which those evils—that is, privations of the good which we call health—are accidents. Just in the same way, what are called vices in the soul are nothing but privations of natural good. And when they are cured, they are not transferred elsewhere: when they cease to exist in the healthy soul, they cannot exist anywhere else.

— St. Augustine of Hippo, Enchiridion of Augustine, Chapter 11: What is called Evil in the Universe is But the Absence of Good

Our perceptions are based on contrast, so that light and dark, good and evil, are imperceptible without each other; in this context, these sets of opposites show a certain symmetry. But a basic study of optics teaches us that light has a physical presence of its own, whereas darkness does not: no "anti-lamp" or "flashdark" can be constructed which casts a beam of darkness onto a surface that is otherwise well-lit. Instead, darkness only appears when sources of light are extinguished or obscured, and only persists when an object absorbs a disproportionate amount of the light that strikes it.

The relationship between light and darkness is often used to frame a metaphorical understanding of good and evil. This metaphor can be used to answer the problem of evil: If evil, like darkness, does not truly exist, but is only a name we give to our perception of privatio boni, then our widespread observation of evil does not preclude the possibility of a benevolent, omniscient, and omnipresent God.

If the metaphor can be extended, and good and evil share the same asymmetry as light and darkness, then evil can have no source, cannot be projected, and, of itself, can offer no resistance to any source of good, no matter how weak or distant. In this case, goodness cannot be actively opposed, and power becomes a consequence of benevolence. However, in this case evil is the default state of the universe, and good exists only through constant effort; any lapse or redirection of good will apparently create evil out of nothing.

References

  1. Augustine of Hippo. Augusine's Enchiridion. Retrieved October 16, 2009.
Stub icon

This Christian theology article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: