| Revision as of 15:14, 4 August 2011 editPhanuruch8555 (talk | contribs)1,179 edits →Speedy deletion nomination of User who hate the disambiguation page← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:44, 5 August 2011 edit undoZzyzx11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators163,851 edits →Eurovision: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| <small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 01:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC).</small> | <small>Delivered by ] on behalf of ] at 01:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC).</small> | ||
| <!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. --> | <!-- Delivery requested by ] and approved by ]. --> | ||
| == Eurovision == | |||
| Hi there. | |||
| I'm writing to clarify my reasons for reverting your edit and changing the ] redirect to point back to ]. It is based on the guidelines found on ''']''': "A topic is ''primary'' for an ambiguous term if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other, and more likely than all the others combined—to be the subject being sought when a reader enters that ambiguous term in the Search box." It has been that way since 2008, where the primary topic for the search term "Eurovision" was the song contest, and thus ] redirects to ]. | |||
| I find your reasons for pointing the redirect to ], such as "the network made the contest, not contest make a network", highly irrelevant. Again, per the rules of ], it is mainly based on ''what topic is much more likely to be searched for by users''. It is ''not'' based on which topic was established first. Nor is it is based on which organization or body founded the other. | |||
| Therefore, unless you provide evidence that it is the network that is much more likely to be searched the most, the only compromise I will make is moving ] to ] – in other words, there will be NO primary topic and "Eurovision" will be the disambiguation page, much like what the ] page is now. | |||
| Regards. ] (]) 04:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:44, 5 August 2011
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I hate disambiguation
Support! Phanuruch8555 (talk)
April 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Misplaced Pages pages, as you did to Madden NFL. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) ) 11:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Phanuruch8555, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Jamietw (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test on the page Formula One worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ronhjones 13:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Misplaced Pages pages, such as those you made to Talk:Pet Society, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronhjones 14:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Phanuruch8555, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Phanuruch8555. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Sebastian Vettel
Hi Phanuruch8555. Why do you keep removing the image from Sebastian Vettel's infobox? DH85868993 (talk) 08:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, if you read WP:3RR, it will explain to you what it is. Basically, you're not allowed to keep changing an article to your preferred version more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. You keep deleting the photo of Vettel every time someone puts it back. You need to discuss why you want the photo removed, instead of deleting it all the time. Maybe you can start a dicussion here: Talk:Sebastian Vettel. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi again - I've just read your user page, and I see that you seem quite happy to continue edit warring over the Vettel photo and your "secret reason". If you start warring again, then 3RR or not, you're gone - finished. I won't be able to help you, and I won't even try after the first time. So the choice is yours. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Phanuruch8555,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 15:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pirate Ahoy Offline.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Pirate Ahoy Offline.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
PF
Hello. I reverted your redirect of PF to Playfish. PF means many different things in many different fields, and the disambiguation page allows us to list all of the meanings, to help readers in navigation. I added Playfish to that page as one of the possible meanings. If you feel strongly that this should redirect to Playfish, please start a thread at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at PF. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jokestress (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- The same applies to your redirect of ESC. If you redirect a disambiguation page like that again you may be blocked. Please don't do it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Formula One Redirects
Hi. It is WP:F1 policy that future races are not given full articles, unless they are the next race (eg 2011 German Grand Prix), or have something notable to be written about them (eg 2010 British Grand Prix). The remaining races of 2011 do not meet either of these criteria, and therefore do not merit articles of their own, but a redirect to the 2011 Formula One season page is better than any potential red links. WilliamF1two (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
{{Eurovision-stub}} and varieties
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Misplaced Pages:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Misplaced Pages requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Misplaced Pages:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision update
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
WPF1 Newsletter (July)
This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 01:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC).
Eurovision
Hi there.
I'm writing to clarify my reasons for reverting your edit and changing the Eurovision redirect to point back to Eurovision Song Contest. It is based on the guidelines found on Misplaced Pages:Primary topic: "A topic is primary for an ambiguous term if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other, and more likely than all the others combined—to be the subject being sought when a reader enters that ambiguous term in the Search box." It has been that way since 2008, where the primary topic for the search term "Eurovision" was the song contest, and thus Eurovision redirects to Eurovision Song Contest.
I find your reasons for pointing the redirect to Eurovision (network), such as "the network made the contest, not contest make a network", highly irrelevant. Again, per the rules of Misplaced Pages:Primary topic, it is mainly based on what topic is much more likely to be searched for by users. It is not based on which topic was established first. Nor is it is based on which organization or body founded the other.
Therefore, unless you provide evidence that it is the network that is much more likely to be searched the most, the only compromise I will make is moving Eurovision (disambiguation) to Eurovision – in other words, there will be NO primary topic and "Eurovision" will be the disambiguation page, much like what the Georgia page is now.
Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)