| Revision as of 09:56, 16 August 2011 editDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits →Speedies gone wrong: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:37, 16 August 2011 edit undoDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits →Speedies gone wrong: DRVnoteNext edit → | ||
| Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
| Please follow ], which is about a set of speedies you are involved in. Meanwhile, it seems to have ended there already, so I might ask for deletion review. -] (]) 09:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | Please follow ], which is about a set of speedies you are involved in. Meanwhile, it seems to have ended there already, so I might ask for deletion review. -] (]) 09:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==Deletion review for ]== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> (Set of four). ] (]) 10:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:37, 16 August 2011
purge server cache | edit count | edit summary usage
Status: Unknown 
2010 February March June July August September October November December 2011 January February March April May June July Cape SpearThe Cape Spear spammer is back. Station1 (talk) 03:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Article name changeThis article should be called Vesuvio Cafe and NOT Vesuvio's. That is just a nickname. As you can see from the official site for the establishment in the article the proper name is Vesuvio Cafe. Please change this article title! Thanks! See the article link here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Vesuvio%27s Cheers!98.151.53.27 (talk) 04:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC) IRCI accidentally 4chan screenshot on Commons :( Who.was.phone (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Yo Check your email.^--iGeMiNix 15:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC) retiredA user you know, Crazymonkey1123, has retired. You may discuss this on his talk page. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) /Sign mine 19:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
Create new categoryIf possible, you could please create a new Misplaced Pages category called: Category:Flavor of Love for the American VH1 reality television series called Flavor of Love. This reality TV show has had a number of spinoffs and there are a lot Misplaced Pages pages about this show and the contestants for it on Misplaced Pages already, thanks.12.196.37.227 (talk) 22:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Âddition to article LCDHave put a proposed addition to the article on LCD on the corresponding discussion page but was not able to sign it by putting SwissLCD (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC) under my contribution. How come ? SwissLCD (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
JackitaThank you for fixing my mistake on Jackita. I was going to fix it, but you already did. Thanks again! MJ94 (talk) 03:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC) HelpSir, actually I need help, I put tag correctly by criteria but some admins like user:AllyD is confusing me about that, you can see that on my talk page, I put the nominating tag for deletion on those autobiographic articles which have not references but this admin stopping me. Can you help me, thanks.--—AssassiN's Creed 22:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
Need your helpThe Bilawal Zardari Bhutto page is improperly titled. The correct title is Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. The page is move-protected. Could you move it? Reformation32 (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 15:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Ryan Vesey contribs 15:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC) New bookstore infobox template suggestionIt would be a good idea for a new bookstore infobox template to be added to Misplaced Pages. There are a number of bookstore articles listed on Misplaced Pages and it seems fitting to have a bookstore infobox. Using a company infobox does not feel as accurate. A bookstore infobox would work better. Here are some of the bookstore Misplaced Pages articles this new infobox could be used for: http://en.wikipedia.org/City_Lights_Bookstore http://en.wikipedia.org/Shakespeare_and_Company_(bookshop) http://en.wikipedia.org/Gotham_Book_Mart Thanks!216.3.118.200 (talk) 15:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Right changesWhat was this about, it showed up on my watchlist "changed rights for User:PumpkinSky from account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed user, file mover, reviewer and rollbacker to account creator, autopatrolled, file mover, reviewer and rollbacker (autoconfirmed)"? Just curious. PumpkinSky talk 01:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
Some stroopwafels for you!
Vandalism onlyHi there FOLEY, VASCO here, the last two IPs i reported (message with the same title, seen in this page still) still have not received their due, but that's cool, they have not acted since my report, but their actions were disruptive believe me. Now, found this: in Nélson Oliveira, "user" up to no good, has even managed to move the footballer's talkpage to another one he insists in creating. Well, at least he's only focused (obssessed?) with only one article, but it's vandalism ONLY! Attentively, happy weekend - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Just being friendly SwisterTwister has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! I know that working hard on Misplaced Pages can build up an appetite, so I thought I'd give you this cookie for strength. SwisterTwister talk 08:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Question about socks and blocksHello there. At WP:Sockpuppet investigations/JimmyDarmodyRules you blocked sockmaster JimmyDarmodyRules (talk · contribs) for 72h. There is a new IP editor who I believe is the same person and currently editing the Falling Skies page. Is this allowed or considered getting around a block? (see contributions of 89.204.188.4 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 89.204.194.140 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)). IP has removed some sourced ratings information just as sock Arrested Developer (talk · contribs) did here in a mass deletion (removing lots of other stuff, too). Sockmaster/socks were all deleting anything negative from the article, although now IP gives another reason. IP also removed redlinks , as did sock AllianceApprovedMagician (talk · contribs): . Just wondering about this. Thanks. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion rationalesHi Gfoley, you have apparently sometimes speedily deleted article citing Not:essay as the reason; this is now being quoted as justification for using that as a valid speedy deletion rationale, which it is not. The discussion is taking place at User talk:SwisterTwister#Speedy deletion contested: Odorless colorless tasteless chemical poison in the worlds water supply. I have argued that in the two cited cases, there were actually other valid speedy deletion criteria, despite your citing not essay. Care to join the discussion? LadyofShalott 22:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 July 2011
Giants roster template protectionNow that the Beltran trade has been made official (the reason for the edit warring), could you please unprotect Template:San Francisco Giants roster so changes can be made? Much appreciated. -- bmitchelf•T•F 16:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Revoke talk page access of blocked IP
Why are you block the school accounthttp://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:202.45.119.15&redirect=no this is not fair to us.my name is ben.this is my family account.tell me the reason why the school account block? message me at my page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzygs940 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
it not my house.it the school ip — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzygs940 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thank you.we just trying to help the school being safe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzygs940 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 29 July 2011 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 05:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Manway 05:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC) Haplogroup J1c3d (Y-DNA)Thanks for your help with the Haplogroup J1c3d (Y-DNA) page. It was my first experience with vandalism so I was at a loss of what to do.--Victar (talk) 05:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Spam IPs
This IP belongs to the range 125.115.0.0/16, which seems to be producing only spam and vandalism - purely disruptive. See almost no constructive edits, no danger of collateral damage.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
We need to discuss "vandalism"From an edit by User:Marinapeaches:
That's a blatant violation of WP:NPOV, and NPOV is covered by the uw-vandalism user warning series. What am I missing here? – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
Request to tag protected article for deletion or mergeHello. You put the protection on Haplogroup J1c3d (Y-DNA) and I was called to discuss the edit war war there. After some attempt to find a reason for this article to exist on the talk page, there seems to be very little support. Everything published about the subject can better be handled in Haplogroup J1c3 (Y-DNA). Or should this be called a merge proposal? Anyway, I can not tag the article, so I request that it be tagged.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Reasons To Delete J1c3d (Y-DNA)
JohnLloydScharf (talk) 02:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Had you looked at the talk page, you would have been disabused of that notion.
Please show a reference to J1c3d or L147.1 in:
JohnLloydScharf (talk) 03:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Just before you froze it, I tried to delete the offending sections. Then I called for it to be deleted. You jumped to a conclusion without ever looking at the article. If you do not care enough to look at the issues, perhaps you should not have become involved.
I have made the proposal now with the proper tag. After looking around I have done a similar thing at the related article Haplogroup J1c3 (Y-DNA). Both these articles have very little written about them which can be handled separately or differently from what can be said about Haplogroup J1 (Y-DNA), and so that parent article should be where all attention moves.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Trouted
You have been trouted for: Blocking that ip address
Difference between my edit and page shownHave worked as R&D engineer with LCDs for over 10 years. Did make major changes (improvements in my opinion) to the artcle on Liquid Crystal Displays a few days ago. However, these changes have not yet been incorporated in the text. They only show up when looking at its revision history. What is the procedure ? Is there a compulsory review by somebody knowledgeable ? Thanks for clarification. SwissLCD (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Change title of articleCould you please change the title of this article about a documentary to the full and correct title. The correct title of this article should be Citizen USA: A 50 State Road Trip. Here is the link to the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/Citizen_USA Thanks!216.3.118.200 (talk) 22:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 08 August 2011
What you did was an act of deliberate vandalism as far as I'm concerned.Speedy deleting in the middle of debate? To prove a point? It utterly sickens me. You've totally abused the speedy rule, and have abused Misplaced Pages and it's supposed reliance on debate. For what? Why? Give me one reason? Outrageous. Matt Lewis (talk) 01:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Requested review of your '2011 London riots' keep decisionI've expanded my argument, and will also put a link from the discussion page of the main Misplaced Pages page (seeing as its presence there was the eventual reason for giving the keep decision). Deletion review for 2011 London riotsAn editor has asked for a deletion review of 2011 London riots. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Matt Lewis (talk) 02:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC) HuggleI know it's been a while but do you think I'm ready or not yet? WayneSlam 00:14, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Command and Conquer Expert! review me... 02:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC) UnblockableI thought that any vandalism only account could be blocked despite not having several warnings. Joe Chill (talk) 00:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Pontiac stationPlease see the new article Pontiac Transportation Center (2011) and the old Pontiac, Michigan (Amtrak station) which has been converted into a redirect. Should the old one have been moved or are there two different structures? If there are two locations we should retain the old for historical resons. If there is just one, the title should just have been correctly moved. And why the disambiguation (2011). You know more about American railway station articles than I do. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
what is the point of this action?Hi, in your edit summary for recent edit / protect action you wrote, "slow-moving edit-war. Both sides please discuss on talk." I find this bizarre. Why would you write that and how does it help? I have ALWAYS used the talk page, and have had an IP that wither writes single sentences and RVs or RVs without a response. What would you have me do? Is there an policy or essay on what to do in this situation when the other user is really not interested in talking and edit wars for months? What am I missing. I was previously admonished on the account by Imzadi 1979 and he would provide no clear guidance either but was quite sure what I was doing was an edit war. Understand, I don't want to edit war, I want to talk to the other user, but when the don't talk I don't see what else the options are. Please, enlighten me. 0 (talk) 20:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC) (edited (with strikeout): just noticed that you full protected the page. 0 (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)) The Signpost: 15 August 2011
Speedies gone wrongPlease follow this talk, which is about a set of speedies you are involved in. Meanwhile, it seems to have ended there already, so I might ask for deletion review. -DePiep (talk) 09:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Deletion review for Template:ISO 15924An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:ISO 15924. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. (Set of four). DePiep (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC) |
Done (
Already unprotected. 
Unprotected this article. Fell free to start a merge discusssion or 