Misplaced Pages

User talk:StAnselm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:44, 26 August 2011 edit110.32.71.29 (talk) OUTING← Previous edit Revision as of 13:38, 26 August 2011 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits 3RR: A complaint has been filed about your editsNext edit →
Line 141: Line 141:
==3RR== ==3RR==
I'm reporting you to the 3RR Notice Board due to your insistence on removing well source material from the ] page. ] (]) 09:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC) I'm reporting you to the 3RR Notice Board due to your insistence on removing well source material from the ] page. ] (]) 09:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
:You seem to have broken the ] rule, according to a complaint at ]. We do not generally consider well-sourced information from major newspapers to be defamatory, so your edits are unlikely to be covered by the BLP exception to 3RR. If we proceed to simply count the edits you are over the limit. Please join the discussion and offer to stop reverting in order to avoid sanctions. ] (]) 13:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:38, 26 August 2011

Template:Archive box collapsible

Proposed deletion of Glutton (film)

The article Glutton (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film in pre-production. WP:NFF

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 15:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

West Front, Salisbury Cathedral

St Anshelm, I noticed that you replaced an incorrect image on this page recently. I am curious to know which image was incorrect. Many thanks for your other disambig work. Best Richard Avery (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Trial of the Knights Templar

I added to the Introduction as your banner called for and would you please review with your comments either there or at my talk page, whichever is appropriate? I also changed the title because this article is only about their persecution in France. Thank you. Mugginsx (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Added more material. Trial of the Knights Templar

The introduction should now be completed according to the requirement at Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (lead section). Will you please read it, and either comment, or removed the banner? Thank you. Mugginsx (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thanks for your gnomish disambiguation of Branding national myths and symbols. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Kate Bracks

Bracks's birthday came from an unpublished source. I will cut it back to 1974 until a reference emerges. WWGB (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

impressed by the amount of disambiguation work In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out!

Hi StAnselm, I just saw your message on my talk page, and I wanted to say thanks for being kind and welcoming. I really appreciate the links (and the cookies!) Flutiki (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Reformers Bookshop

Hello, St Anselm. Thanks for the feedback about Reformers - it's very helpful to have a fresh set of eyes look over something I've done. I'll work on the article over the next few days to bring out the fact that they've grown from being just a bookstore to being the largest evangelical, reformed wholesale/distributor in Australasia (while still keeping their retail side open). Torquil Sorensen (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

2001:A Space Odyssey edit

Hi - Thanks for helping out with the article. Even though the DaB's you added were incorrect, they pointed out the need for the correct DaB's to be added, which were not there previously(unbeknownst to us). Now the article is in better shape than it was - thanks! Shirtwaist 00:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, StAnselm. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 02:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 02:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I've unprotected; I'll leave JBW a note. Acroterion (talk) 02:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Tom Hickey et al

You made a series of moves earlier to Tom Hickey related pages. Whilst I don't agree that the moves were necessary, or are even an improvement, I'm can see no benefit in arguing over them, so long as you fix the now misdirected links. Presumably it just slipped your mind? Fmph (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Desired Life Ministries

I just wanted to let you know that I saw the expired prod you had placed on Desired Life Ministries. At first i deleted the article, as it clearly appears to fail WP:ORG, but then I looked through the history, and noted that it had been prodded once in 2006. Technically this means it can't be prodded again, so I had to undelete it and send it to AfD. You may want to comment on there. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Brent Macaffer
Near East School of Theology
Tom Lynch (Australian footballer, born 1992)
John McCarthy (Australian rules footballer, born 1989)
A Scandal in Bohemia
Choliamb
Scott Reed (Australian rules footballer)
Paul King Jewett
Tomomi Mochizuki
Azariah (prophet)
Paul Atkins (Australian rules footballer)
Ryan Jackson
Paul Puopolo
Millard Erickson
Adam Hartlett
Tom Rockliff
Harley Bennell
David Ellard
St. Petersburg Christian University
Cleanup
Evangelical environmentalism
West Coast Eagles
Evangelical left
Merge
Danvers Statement
National Rugby League
Substitution (poetry)
Add Sources
Non-League football
Post-evangelical
Australian Football League
Wikify
Zoltan Kovács (footballer born 1954)
Multicast encryption
The Medieval Translator. Traduire au Moyen Age
Expand
David F. Wells
Eternity (magazine)
Princeton theologians

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for showing you are a bully. And thanks for the nasty messages left on my talk page. Kennethtamara (talk) 22:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

PBS

You have reverted edits to PBS twice within the past few hours. Please do not violate WP:3RR. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 00:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

OUTING

Okay. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1119E38 (talkcontribs) 04:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

3RR

I'm reporting you to the 3RR Notice Board due to your insistence on removing well source material from the Geoff Shaw (politician) page. 110.32.71.29 (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

You seem to have broken the WP:3RR rule, according to a complaint at WP:AN3#User:StAnselm reported by 110.32.71.29 (talk) (Result: ). We do not generally consider well-sourced information from major newspapers to be defamatory, so your edits are unlikely to be covered by the BLP exception to 3RR. If we proceed to simply count the edits you are over the limit. Please join the discussion and offer to stop reverting in order to avoid sanctions. EdJohnston (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)