Revision as of 12:34, 10 March 2006 editSamsara (talk | contribs)27,603 edits your email← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:13, 21 March 2006 edit undoVanished user 19794758563875 (talk | contribs)17,339 edits Request for ArbitrationNext edit → | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
] (] • ]) 12:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC) | ] (] • ]) 12:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Request for Arbitration == | |||
I have filed a request for Arbitration with regard to ] ].] 06:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:13, 21 March 2006
Hi Axel147, welcome to wikipedia. I'll include here the standard welcome message, which contains useful pointers to various resources:
Welcome!
Hello, Axel147, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
If you ever have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I'll be happy to help as much as I can. May the Wiki be with you.
Best wishes,
Samsara contrib 20:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Vote on natural selection intro passage
As a contributing editor of the English wikipedia article on natural selection, you are being invited to vote on two different versions of a controversial passage of the introduction. Please see details on the talk page, Talk:Natural selection#Vote on intro passage.
Yours sincerely,
Samsara contrib 01:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Compromise edit
Hi, I liked your "compromise edit". Let's hope we can get it accepted by the rest of the community! Cheers,
Samsara contrib 13:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
NatSel
The definition of Darwin is irrelevant, and only of interest within the historical context. If we were here to reinforce old or incorrect ideas, we can as well promote Intelligent design and creationism as the way to look at evolution, as that is a view hold by many, if not most people in the US. As such, the criterion is not popular usage, but correct usage. Therefore, my task with the NatSel article is ended unless the focus will be current usage, with a subsection on the discussion of the historical usage. --KimvdLinde 20:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
your email
Hi Axel,
I notice you have email disabled for this account. Can you email me so I can send you something by reply? phi1ipp 4T yahoo.com (note digit "one" in phi1ipp).
Thanks,
Samsara (talk • contribs) 12:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Request for Arbitration
I have filed a request for Arbitration with regard to Marcosantezana here.KimvdLinde 06:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC)