Misplaced Pages

Scholars for 9/11 Truth: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:10, 24 March 2006 editRenamed user FoctULjDYf (talk | contribs)4,596 edits rv pov; this is not a place for SF911T to soapbox, but to describe their beliefs← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 24 March 2006 edit undoJames H. Fetzer (talk | contribs)45 edits Media Coverage and WorksNext edit →
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


==Members== ==Members==
Among those included in this society are: Among those included among the members of this society are:


*''']''': Professor of philosophy of religion and theology, at the Claremont School of Theology *''']''': Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, at the Claremont School of Theology, and the author or editor of thirty books
*''']''': former Chief Economist for the ], former Director of the Criminal Justice Center *''']''': A & M Professor of Economics Emeritus, former Chief Economist for the ], former Director of the Criminal Justice Center
*''']''': ] of ], ], co-chair of S9/11T and the creator of its home page and its forum *''']''': ] of ], ], co-chair of S9/11T and an editor of its forthcoming publication, Journal for 9/11 Studies
*''']''': Former Director of the U.S. Advanced Space Programs Development in the ] and ] administrations, former ] ] with 101 combat missions. *''']''': Former Director of the U.S. Advanced Space Programs Development in the ] and ] administrations, former ] ] with 101 combat missions.
*''']''': Distinguished McKnight University ] of ] at the ], Duluth, author or editor of more than two dozen books and co-chair of S9/11T
*''']''': Director of ]
*''']''': Distinguished McKnight University ] of ] at the ], Duluth, author or editor of more than 20 books and co-chair of S9/11T
*''']''': former state-secretary in the ] ], director of the German ], minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years. *''']''': former state-secretary in the ] ], director of the German ], minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years.
*''']''': investigative ], ], and syndicated ] with articles in ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. *''']''': investigative ], ], and syndicated ] with articles in ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].
*''']''': ], ] and ] who works at the ] in ]. *''']''': ], ] and ] at the ] in ] and author of six books on public policy issues


==Conclusion== ==Conclusion==
Their conclusion is based on the results of their own scientific and political research. These experts contend that the official version of events on September 11 are one of the greatest hoaxes in history, which has led to war and unconstitutional policy and decision making. They believe that the ] is permeated with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, including the omission of the collapse of ], which was not hit by airplanes and collapsed hours after the twin towers were struck. Their conclusions are based on the results of their own scientific and political research. They contend that the official version of events on September 11, 2001 is one of the great hoaxes in world history, which has been used to manipulate the American people for political purposes and has led to undermining the Constitution, launching illegal wars, and subjecting the people to virtually unrestricted surveillance. Since terrorism involves the use of acts of violence and threats of violence to instill fear into a population in order to manipulate it for political purposes, their findings suggest, ironically, that the American government appears to be using terrorism to manipulate the American people.


==Criticism of Scholars For 9/11 Truth== ==Criticism of Scholars For 9/11 Truth==
Line 31: Line 30:


===Contacts=== ===Contacts===
Fetzer, a philosophy professor at the ], and Jones, a physics professor at ], are listed as contacts. Fetzer, McKnight University Professor at the ], who is a philosopher of science, and Jones, a professor of physics at ], are listed as contacts.


==Media Coverage and Works== ==Media Coverage and Works==
Line 48: Line 47:
'''Papers:''' '''Papers:'''


Scholars for 9/11 Truth claims these papers have been peer-reviewed, although they have not been published in any scientific journal. Scholars for 9/11 Truth describes these papers as "peer-reviewed," a point discussed above.
*“Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. *“Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
*“The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True” by David Ray Griffin, Ph.D. *“The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True” by David Ray Griffin, Ph.D.

Revision as of 18:23, 24 March 2006

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a group, founded in january 2006, of about 50 faculty, students, and scholars who question the official scientific account of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

The group believes that the investigations by FEMA and NIST regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings are inadequate, and that crucial facts and question pertaining to the attacks have been ignored by senior government officials. These questions include: What caused building #7 to collapse? Where is the science that explains how all three WTC buildings collapsed close to the speed of gravity? Why was the vast majority of the evidence immeadiately disgarded and/or is unaccessible for independent researchers? The group is petitioning congress for access to the remaining evidence in order for scientific research to be carried out to determine whether or not explosives were utilized to bring down the WTC buildings.

According to their website, "The members of S9/11T are encouraged to take an active role by devoting themselves to reporting the results of research on 9/11 to the nation and the world by means of lectures, articles, and other venues.".

Members

Among those included among the members of this society are:

Conclusion

Their conclusions are based on the results of their own scientific and political research. They contend that the official version of events on September 11, 2001 is one of the great hoaxes in world history, which has been used to manipulate the American people for political purposes and has led to undermining the Constitution, launching illegal wars, and subjecting the people to virtually unrestricted surveillance. Since terrorism involves the use of acts of violence and threats of violence to instill fear into a population in order to manipulate it for political purposes, their findings suggest, ironically, that the American government appears to be using terrorism to manipulate the American people.

Criticism of Scholars For 9/11 Truth

Although most activists and researchers in the 9/11 Truth Movement have been positive and excited about the formation of a scholars group and most would agree that it is an important step for the movement to take, some also express concern that members of the scholars group and its website are promoting debunked theories which discredit the movement , such as the idea that the commercial aircraft used on 9/11 were not actually involved in the attacks, but instead, were replaced by fake planes or military drones, as described by Morgan Reynolds and Leonard Spencer, among other members of the group.

Some 9/11 researchers have criticized the website, noting that it promotes one-sided views of issues which are debated within the movement (such as the idea that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon). Although the 'Resources' page states, "We do not necessarily endorse or concur with conclusions or opinions expressed here, but we think that they provide suggestive and stimulating resources for further contemplation," only one side of a serious and divisive debate within the 9/11 movement is presented for contemplation. Similarly, papers asserting that a plane did not hit the Pentagon are posted on the front page, but no papers asserting the opposite are posted, that a Boeing 757 did indeed hit the building as described by dozens of witnesses at the scene.

As of February 2006, the website was pointing readers to sources which some members of the 9/11 Truth movement say lack credibility and scientific merit, are packaged as entertainment and distort evidence in favor of their claims. A related concern has been that the website effectively ignores the websites and original work by some of the most respected long-term researchers of the 9/11 attacks, such as CooperativeResearch.org, FromTheWilderness.com, 911Truth.org, OilEmpire.us, 911Research.WTC7.net, Ratical.org/ratville/CAH/, and WTCEO.org. These websites represent the efforts of people who have been effectively dealing with the media, victims' families, and congressmembers for years. In contrast to the scholars group, most of these researchers believe that commercial jets with real passengers did hit the buildings on September 11 2001.

Contacts

Fetzer, McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth, who is a philosopher of science, and Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University, are listed as contacts.

Media Coverage and Works

Radio Interviews:

Lectures:

  • 15 March 2006 -- Kevin Ryan: "A 9/11 Whistleblower Examines the Official Conspiracy Theory"
  • 30 March 2006 -- David Ray Griffin "9/11: The Myth & the Reality"
  • 31 March 2006 -- Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D., and Don Paul, Author

"Critical Analysis: 9/11"

  • 2 June4 June 2006 -- Steven E. Jones "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future”

Papers:

Scholars for 9/11 Truth describes these papers as "peer-reviewed," a point discussed above.

  • “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
  • “The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True” by David Ray Griffin, Ph.D.
  • “Thinking about "Conspiracy Theories": 9/11 and JFK” by James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

See also

External links

Categories: