| Revision as of 17:07, 30 October 2011 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Edit warring at Ariel University Center of Samaria: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:11, 30 October 2011 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Edit warring at Ariel University Center of Samaria: Warning of the discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIANext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 days'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> The complete report of this case is at ]. ] (]) 17:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 days'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> The complete report of this case is at ]. ] (]) 17:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| <hr> | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width: 100%; background: ivory;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the ] section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| |} — ] (]) 17:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:11, 30 October 2011
prior accounts
Have you ever used a prior account on Misplaced Pages? nableezy - 21:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Also, in case you not already aware, all articles in the Arab-Israeli conflict area are subject to a 1 revert rule, meaning you may not make more than one revert on any page in any 24 hour period. nableezy - 21:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, George45646! Thank you for your contributions. I am Epeefleche and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Epeefleche (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Ariel University Center
If you continue to remove the tags and misrepresent the citations given I may request that your account be restricted from editing that article. Please do not continue blindly removing valid tags. Thank you. nableezy - 18:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you are logging out to perform reverts you would otherwise be restricted from doing that is abusive sockpuppetry and you may be blocked or banned for doing so. nableezy - 12:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you do not self-revert your change I will be reporting you to arbitration enforcement. nableezy - 15:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop all the time threatening George45646 (talk) 16:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- You have been reported to arbitration enforcement. You can see this here. nableezy - 16:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring at Ariel University Center of Samaria
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
The complete report of this case is at WP:AE#George45646. EdJohnston (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page. |