| Revision as of 00:10, 29 March 2006 editPoolGuy (talk | contribs)308 edits Unblock Request← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:17, 29 March 2006 edit undoTawker (talk | contribs)Administrators18,670 editsm →Unblock RequestNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ==Unblock Request== | ==Unblock Request== | ||
| {{unblock}} | |||
| Admin Nlu has been pursuing punitive action against this account without basis. Admin Nlu has failed to ] even one reason for their pursuits despite overwhelming references presenting how no policy violation has occurred. Nlu's actions appear to be on the basis of trying to purge sockpuppets. None of the sockpuppets has done anything abusive. Nlu fails to recognize that the mere presence of a ] is not a violation of Misplaced Pages Policy. Nlu's blocking has restricted the ability to communicate on Misplaced Pages and obtain a researched and referenced evaluation of whether a policy violation ever occurred in the first place (none had). | Admin Nlu has been pursuing punitive action against this account without basis. Admin Nlu has failed to ] even one reason for their pursuits despite overwhelming references presenting how no policy violation has occurred. Nlu's actions appear to be on the basis of trying to purge sockpuppets. None of the sockpuppets has done anything abusive. Nlu fails to recognize that the mere presence of a ] is not a violation of Misplaced Pages Policy. Nlu's blocking has restricted the ability to communicate on Misplaced Pages and obtain a researched and referenced evaluation of whether a policy violation ever occurred in the first place (none had). | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| I can direct you to other reference points if you need more info beyond these two, however they should be a good start. ] 00:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | I can direct you to other reference points if you need more info beyond these two, however they should be a good start. ] 00:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Well, you were warned 7 times, a block would be warranted after a while -- ] 00:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:17, 29 March 2006
Hello, welcome to Misplaced Pages. Here's some tips:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.
Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Misplaced Pages policies.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela. 07:04, Feb 3, 2004 (UTC)
Pet Peeve
- Please see Talk:Pet peeve before reverting again. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Re-insertion of indiscriminate list at Pet peeve
Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie 22:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- You'll notice from Talk:Pet peeve that I'm not the only one who thinks that the list is unencyclopedia and a violation of WP:NOT. If you'd like to file a WP:RFC on the matter, go for it. Also, please do not delete legitimate comments from other users; doing so is considered to be vandalism. OhNoitsJamie 16:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 16:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Please note that calling someone else a "vandal" for good-faith edits is a personal attack. If you disagree, discuss, don't revert. Also note the three-revert rule. android79 17:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- You said: I am, of course, reverting the blanking done by one user who is blanking without discussion. You appear to be ignoring the discussion that started at Talk:Pet peeve and here on your own talk page. Removal of content is not an act of vandalism when it is supported by many on the talk page and when the content is unsourced. android79 17:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the 3RR on Pet peeve. android79 18:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Removing warning notices from your talk page is prohibited, per WP:VANDAL. Please don't do this again. -Colin Kimbrell 15:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
arbitration
i'm filin an arbitration against jiang and Nlu. if you have ever been treated with hostility by either one of them . please show your support on my talk page. oh yeah and write down the way Nlu treat you on the arbitration page. thnx a lot, man.--Freestyle.king 06:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
1 week block
You have been blocked for 1 week for abusive use of sock puppets. --Nlu (talk) 22:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Unblock Request
Admin Nlu has been pursuing punitive action against this account without basis. Admin Nlu has failed to cite even one reason for their pursuits despite overwhelming references presenting how no policy violation has occurred. Nlu's actions appear to be on the basis of trying to purge sockpuppets. None of the sockpuppets has done anything abusive. Nlu fails to recognize that the mere presence of a sockpuppet is not a violation of Misplaced Pages Policy. Nlu's blocking has restricted the ability to communicate on Misplaced Pages and obtain a researched and referenced evaluation of whether a policy violation ever occurred in the first place (none had).
An unblock of this account is respectfully requested on the basis that no violation of policy has occured to warrant the block. I apologize for the complexity of research for this request. It would have been contained at Check User and GoldToeMarionette if it were not for Nlu's overzealous page protecting and account blocking.
I can direct you to other reference points if you need more info beyond these two, however they should be a good start. PoolGuy 00:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you were warned 7 times, a block would be warranted after a while -- Tawker 00:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)