Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:01, 8 November 2011 editDaveosaurus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,594 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:50, 8 November 2011 edit undoTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits checkedNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}


{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} {{SPI case status|checked}}


=====<big>08 November 2011</big>===== =====<big>08 November 2011</big>=====
Line 23: Line 23:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
The two named accounts, plus P&W are all {{unlikely}} to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts ''tagged'' as P&W, but I'm can't see why. <font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

---- ----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 19:50, 8 November 2011

Phoenix and Winslow

Phoenix and Winslow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow/Archive.

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

08 November 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Two more single-edit accounts whose only contribution has been to back P&W up in his/her attempts to disrupt the talk page at Ugg boots. This fits the modus operandi of confirmed sock puppets such as Bigdog2828 and Barclaygla09. Daveosaurus (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The two named accounts, plus P&W are all  Unlikely to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts tagged as P&W, but I'm can't see why. TNXMan 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories: