| Revision as of 18:12, 24 November 2011 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,480 editsm Signing comment by User38563 - "→It says Ray Bledsoe: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:50, 24 November 2011 edit undoJasper Deng (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,741 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Hopkins DID win Joppy's belt even if the WBA created yet another "regular" title after he beat Joppy. If you ever go to Hopkins' home by chance, I guarantee you that he has that WBA "regular" belt in his trophy case or wherever he keeps his belts alongside the WBA "super" title, the WBC, the IBF, the WBO, and The Ring belts that he has. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Hopkins DID win Joppy's belt even if the WBA created yet another "regular" title after he beat Joppy. If you ever go to Hopkins' home by chance, I guarantee you that he has that WBA "regular" belt in his trophy case or wherever he keeps his belts alongside the WBA "super" title, the WBC, the IBF, the WBO, and The Ring belts that he has. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == November 2011 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 22:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:50, 24 November 2011
IBO
I'm not trying to vandalize, but the IBO is a meaningless, irrelevant sanctioning body. It's not legitimate, so shouldn't be recognized. Don't you agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by User38563 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
It says Ray Bledsoe
http://www.thesweetscience.com/news/articles/13375-kimbo-slice-to-fight-ray-bledsoe
Oh sorry, the 1st report I saw it said Ray, not Tay, it is Tay.
Bernard Hopkins became undisputed champ by beating William Joppy. You're the fool if you think that Wladimir can't eventually fight Alexander Povetkin and become undisputed WBA champ. As long as the possibility exists for them to face each other, then it must be recognized that Povetkin is a current legit heavyweight titlist. Why do you think his name is on the page smartass? How can you have ALL of the major belts in a division when it's clear as day that there's someone else out there with a legitimate sanctioning body belt? I don't agree with the WBA's policy of having 2 titlists per division in certain weight classes but it's a fact that they do and as such, it must be represented on an encyclopedic website such as Misplaced Pages. Do your research, THEN make edits... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.111.193 (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1 more thing
Hopkins DID win Joppy's belt even if the WBA created yet another "regular" title after he beat Joppy. If you ever go to Hopkins' home by chance, I guarantee you that he has that WBA "regular" belt in his trophy case or wherever he keeps his belts alongside the WBA "super" title, the WBC, the IBF, the WBO, and The Ring belts that he has. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.111.193 (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)