| Revision as of 02:11, 31 March 2006 editInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 edits Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Computer and video games← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:23, 31 March 2006 edit undoDoom127 (talk | contribs)1,749 edits blankingNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{| class="messagebox" style="width: 28em; background: AntiqueWhite;" |
|
] '''Welcome to my talk page. Please place your comments at the bottom of the page.''' |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
|
|
|
| ] |
|
'''Talk Archives'''<br> |
|
|
|
| '''In accordance with inane "groupthink" and ridculous harassment on Misplaced Pages, This user has abandoned their account. <br> Brazil4Linux was right, I guess.''' |
|
] |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
|
|
|
|} |
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
==Long time, no see== |
|
|
Sorry I haven't answered back in a long time. Currently moving to other areas in wiki for the time being, most recently politics and history. |
|
|
|
|
|
You probably remember the misleading news headline in the ] article, Brazil4Linux is still active under that name in wikinews. However, Brazil4Linux has abandonned his original wikipedia account and I have no idea what his new name is (Microsoft Fanboy was a temp til he got B4L back), but if he pops up and starts vandalizing, we will known about it... |
|
|
|
|
|
Again, let me know if you need any help. ] 20:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Brazil4Linux's Userpage== |
|
|
Have you seen Brazil4Linux's ]? He is claiming he abandoned his account because of harassement than the reality of his indefinite ban. How are you doing? ] 04:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== who is 201.58.153.33 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way that you could uncover this anon user ? He seems to be stalking me, reverting my articles and it doesn't matter whether they are politics or video games. |
|
|
|
|
|
There is also one or some anon users that are recently messing up the ] page, such as 201.58.163.84 and 205.188.116.5 (is Brazil4Linux back in some incarnation?) |
|
|
|
|
|
] 10:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I much appreciate your help on IP identifications. If there is no way to stop him from his dynamic IP, every single article I edited would have to be semi-protected... On the plus side, the person that I've been having an edit war with in politics, ], is a respectable editor that plays by the rules, so he might understand what Brazil4Linux is doing. |
|
|
|
|
|
:] 4:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Watch Out== |
|
|
You might want to watch out for this user,], seems to be mocking you. <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 00:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:The user is banned now, the user attacked my user page, reverted my contributions and finally redirected ] and ] to your User page. Sigh, it was probably the anon. on the Nintendo page. <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> |
|
|
::Argg. The user went on to create seven sockpuppets and ten anon. IP's to attack ten pages of my contributions up to ten times. At the end five admins. were needed to finally stop the vandal. What did I do to make him so angry? <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 01:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Hello== |
|
|
This is one of the two administrators involved in the 4Linix issue. Shall I change all sockpuppet flags to that name, if it really is him? Or will we need more evidence to shift the blame to him? ] 03:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Unfortunately, I may have to pull out of the investigation for now (going to go to bed soon), but please keep me posted and tell me if I can do something. ] 03:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Okay, thanks. If I have some time before I go to bed, I'll get on it. If not, feel free to post it. ] 03:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I fixed the tags on his sockpuppets. This IP trace will be key if this starts to escalate even more. ] 03:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* The incident seems to have been halted for the time being (I s-protected some pages for an hour or so earlier this evening). However, I bet he'll come after me now :) This whole thing is straight out of something like ], heh... |
|
|
|
|
|
By the way, I'm going to try and do some research on this B4L user, including his edits, reasoning, and so on. ] 03:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I kinda figured it was Brazil4Linux after the vandal started redirecting and should great knowledge of Misplaced Pages. Who else from Brazil has a vendetta against you and me? First he attacked GoldDragon then me, you better watch out Doom127, you are next in line. <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 20:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Talmud == |
|
|
|
|
|
I very appreciate your edit. ] 23:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
: I appreciate your comments. May I seek your advice regarding some reverts on that very talk page. I hope you don't mind. thanks ] 23:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thank you very much. I appreciate that. ] 00:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Nintendo== |
|
|
THanks for your nice comments! <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 05:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Also if you ever need help just ask! <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 05:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 3RR == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Doom, this is just to warn you that if you revert again at ], you'll be in violation of 3RR. Cheers, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 08:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The above isn't a threat. It's a warning, in case you weren't familiar with 3RR, which you seem not to be, bceause violations are not content-dependent, except for simple vandalism, which this isn't, regardless of your personal views about it. See ]. As for the edits, I saw them as trolling, if not by design then certainly in effect. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 08:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::I advise you to read our policies for a definition of "simple vandalism," and also to note that IZAK did not simply blank the page, but archived it. Pages do have to be archived at some point, and it's a good idea to do it when that kind of repetitive conversation is ongoing. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 08:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
Please keep your tone civil on this page, and refrain from making accusations of other users. Remember, wikipedia policy dictates that we discuss content, not users. --] 02:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
